Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallThe headline’s claim that “even more advertisers are planning to leave” refers to a specific episode in November 2023, not a verified current exodus. Contemporary reports said several companies and the European Commission paused or suspended advertising on X, formerly Twitter, amid concerns about ad placements near extremist content and Elon Musk’s public conduct. Musk responded at a November 29 event with a blunt rebuke to advertisers.
What happened in November 2023
On November 17, 2023, Axios reported that Apple, IBM, Disney, Comcast/NBCUniversal, Lions Gate Entertainment, Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount had paused or suspended ads on X. The confirmation basis differed: IBM issued a statement saying it had immediately suspended all X advertising while it investigated; Axios reported Apple’s decision based on sources; and a European Commission spokesperson confirmed that the Commission would freeze advertising. The report connected the pullback to Musk’s response to an antisemitic conspiracy post and concerns about ads appearing beside far-right content described in a Media Matters for America report. Axios’s November 17 report provides the contemporaneous account.
On November 29, TechCrunch described Apple, Comcast/NBCUniversal, Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, IBM, Paramount Global, Lionsgate and the European Commission as organizations that had paused or pulled ads in recent weeks. These are reports of decisions during that 2023 episode, not a current list of advertisers or proof that every company made the same kind of announcement. TechCrunch’s report from the DealBook event covers the remarks and the advertiser pauses.
Why advertisers pulled back
Ad placement and content moderation
Advertisers were concerned that their ads could appear beside content they considered extremist or otherwise unsuitable for their brands. The immediate dispute followed reporting by Media Matters for America about ad adjacencies on X. The issue was not simply whether a particular post violated a platform rule: a brand may also object to the setting in which its ad appears.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
Association with the platform owner
Axios quoted Lou Paskalis, founder and CEO of AJL Advisory and former head of global media at Bank of America, saying: “The issue is no longer about content adjacencies or content moderation. It’s simply that the owner is not someone marketers can do business with.” That is Paskalis’s assessment, not a measured consensus among advertisers. Axios also reported concerns about association with the platform’s owner and the possibility that ad revenue could flow to creators posting content brands found objectionable. Axios’s November 18 coverage discusses those marketer concerns.
What Musk said to advertisers
At the November 29, 2023 New York Times DealBook event, in an exchange moderated by Andrew Ross Sorkin, Musk addressed the advertiser pauses. TechCrunch reported that he said, “Don’t advertise.” He went on: “If somebody’s going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money? Go fuck yourself,” then added, “Go. Fuck. Yourself. Is that clear?”
Rank #2
Musk also said: “What this advertising boycott is going to do is kill the company,” followed by: “And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company, and we will document it in great detail.” These were remarks about the 2023 boycott, not a recent statement.
How X disputed the ad-placement reporting
In a November 18, 2023 post, X said Media Matters had “completely misrepresented the real user experience on X.” The company argued that the organization used an alternate account and curated its feed to find particular ad placements. X said its logs showed that scenario received 13 times the median number of ads served to an X user. It also claimed that, out of 5.5 billion ad impressions on X that day, fewer than 50 were served against the organic content featured in the Media Matters article. Those are X’s descriptions of its internal data; they have not been independently verified in the cited material. X’s November 18 post contains the company’s response.
X further said that, among nine posts Media Matters highlighted as policy violations, it determined that one violated its policies and took action against it. The statement documents X’s position in the dispute; it does not by itself resolve the underlying brand-safety question.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What safety steps X said it had taken
In a November 14, 2023 post, X said it had updated keyword blocklists with more than 1,000 conflict-related terms to prevent ad targeting and adjacency in Timeline or Search placements, and said it did not monetize policy-violating content. In the November section of that post, X also reported that it had actioned more than 325,000 pieces of content violating its Terms of Service and removed more than 3,000 accounts associated with violent entities in the region. These are company-reported measures for the period covered by that dated section, not independently verified enforcement totals. The post also includes a January 7, 2024 update; the figures above refer to its November section. X’s November 14 post sets out its stated measures.
Quick Recap
Best Value
What the reports do—and do not—establish
- Established for the episode: contemporaneous reporting named several companies and the European Commission as having paused, suspended or frozen advertising in November 2023, with different confirmation bases.
- Not established by these reports: that advertisers are planning to leave X now, how many of the named organizations later resumed spending, or X’s current advertising revenue.
- Still contested: whether the reported ad placements reflected an ordinary user experience and whether X’s controls addressed advertisers’ concerns. X disputed the reporting and described its own safety measures, but the cited accounts do not independently settle the disagreement.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
