The best men’s sunglasses depend on more than style: start with verified UV protection, then match the frame fit, lens configuration and coverage to how you’ll use them. Travel + Leisure named seven standouts after testing 24 pairs over six months; its picks range from the $35 Tifosi Swank to sport, classic and designer options. The “best” labels below are that publication’s categories, not a universal ranking, and listed prices can change.
How these sunglasses were tested
Travel + Leisure says it tested 24 pairs repeatedly over six months, wearing them for activities such as walking, jogging, errands, driving and poolside use. The publication evaluated fit, comfort, style, sun and glare performance, and the durability of hinges, temple arms and storage. Its findings are the publisher’s reported test results, not independent laboratory verification.
Men’s Health describes a separate process: its fashion team says it has tested more than 50 styles since 2020, assessing style, fit, comfort, durability, value, glare reduction and UV protection in everyday, travel and outdoor situations. That provides another buying perspective, rather than a second test of each selection below.
The seven best sunglasses for men in 2026
The details and category labels in this guide come from Travel + Leisure’s review, updated July 20, 2026. Fit is personal, and features may differ among lens colors or configurations.
#1 Best Overall
| Pick | Fit and coverage | UV protection and lenses | Comfort and durability notes | Price listed by Travel + Leisure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall: Crap Eyewear Heavy Tropix | Medium-to-wide fit | 100% UVA/UVB protection; CR-39 polarized lenses except for the deep rose lens | The reviewer reported comfort for city walking, driving and pickleball, including staying put while sweating. | $119 at Backcountry and Crap Eyewear when accessed; prices may change. |
| Best polarized: Kaenon Burnet Mid | Medium fit | SR-91 polarized lenses; review describes impact and scratch resistance. | Lightweight with reported glare reduction; the reviewer said the pair felt a little cheap despite holding up during testing. | $175 at Amazon and $199 at Kaenon when accessed; prices may change. |
| Best designer: Canada Goose Moraine | Oversized aviator; wider-face tester found the adjustable nosepiece and forgiving temples secure. May overwhelm narrower faces. | Polarized lenses and UV protection; a specific UV percentage is not stated in the review. | Adjustable nosepiece and forgiving temples were useful for the wider-face tester. | Not stated in the review. |
| Best value: Tifosi Swank | Small-to-medium fit | 100% UVA/UVB protection; lightweight, shatterproof and scratch-resistant polycarbonate lenses. Only some colorways are polarized. | The nosepiece may bother some wearers during extended use. | $35 at Amazon when accessed; price may change. |
| Most durable: Ombraz Classics | Armless design with adjustable cord; unusual fit style may not suit everyone. | Polarized lenses and 100% UVA/UVB protection. | The reviewer reported extended use while hiking, doing water activities and driving. | $160 at Ombraz when accessed; price may change. |
| Best sporty: Oakley RadarLock Path | Wraparound coverage and low-bridge fit; that fit may not work for everyone. | Select lenses are polarized; the review does not specify a UV percentage. | The reviewer reported comfortable use in snow, sun and rain, as well as on walks and bike rides. | Not stated in the review. |
| Best classic: Ray-Ban RB4420 | Medium-to-wide fit; reviewer reported a secure high-bridge fit. | 100% UV protection; polarization is available on select lenses. The writer’s black pair had non-polarized gray lenses; a green-lens option was polarized. | The writer found the pair somewhat heavy after more than four hours. | Not stated in the review. |
Best overall: Crap Eyewear Heavy Tropix
Choose the Heavy Tropix if you want a versatile everyday pair that the reviewer found comfortable across city walking, driving and pickleball. Its reported medium-to-wide fit and grip while sweating make it a plausible all-rounder. Check the lens choice: the deep rose lens is the stated exception to the polarized CR-39 options.
Best polarized: Kaenon Burnet Mid
The Burnet Mid is the clearest pick here when glare reduction is your priority and a medium fit suits you. Travel + Leisure describes its SR-91 polarized lenses as lightweight and resistant to impact and scratches, while also noting the reviewer’s impression that the pair felt a little cheap. Confirm the exact model and lens configuration when shopping.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Best designer: Canada Goose Moraine
The Moraine is an oversized polarized aviator that suited the review’s wider-face tester, who found its adjustable nosepiece and forgiving temples secure. Its scale is a styling and fit trade-off: it may dominate a narrower face. The review does not provide a UV-protection percentage or listed price.
Best value: Tifosi Swank
The Swank offers lightweight polycarbonate lenses described as shatterproof and scratch-resistant, plus 100% UVA/UVB protection, at the review’s listed $35 price. Its small-to-medium fit makes it worth considering if larger frames slide or feel oversized. Polarization depends on colorway, and some wearers may find the nosepiece uncomfortable over a long stretch.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #3
Most durable: Ombraz Classics
The Classics replace conventional arms with an adjustable cord. Travel + Leisure’s reviewer used them for hiking, water activities and driving and describes the lenses as polarized with 100% UVA/UVB protection. The cord-based design is distinctive, so try it only if you are comfortable with an unconventional fit.
Best sporty: Oakley RadarLock Path
The RadarLock Path’s wraparound shape is designed to extend coverage at the sides, and the review reports comfortable use across changing outdoor conditions and activities. Its low-bridge fit is a potential advantage for some wearers and a reason for others to try it on before buying. Polarization is limited to select lenses; the review does not state a UV percentage.
Rank #4
Best classic: Ray-Ban RB4420
The RB4420 is a medium-to-wide classic option with 100% UV protection, but do not assume every version is polarized. The reviewer’s black pair had non-polarized gray lenses, while a green-lens option was polarized. The writer found the high-bridge fit secure but the frame somewhat heavy after more than four hours.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What to check before buying
UV protection comes before lens darkness
The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends sunglasses labeled 100% UV or UV400, or sunglasses that block both UV-A and UV-B rays. A dark tint, a familiar brand or polarization alone does not establish UV protection. The AAO notes that UV exposure can harm the eye’s surface tissues, cornea and lens; its guidance is to verify the protection label rather than judge by appearance.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Polarization reduces glare; it does not replace UV protection
Polarized lenses can help reduce glare reflected from water, snow, pavement and wet roads, which can be useful for driving or outdoor activities. They are a glare feature, not proof of UV blocking. If you want polarization, verify that the exact lens or colorway you are buying includes it.
Fit and coverage should match the activity
Frame width, bridge height, nosepiece design and temple comfort all affect whether sunglasses stay secure. Wraparound styles can provide additional side coverage for sports and outdoor use. The review’s low-bridge RadarLock Path and oversized Moraine illustrate why a feature that suits one face may be a poor fit for another.
Compare the full trade-off, not just the price
The Swank is the value-oriented option in this group; the designer Moraine and specialized Classics offer different styling or design choices. Price does not guarantee comfort, durability or lens performance. Consider how long you’ll wear the pair, where you’ll use it and whether the fit or lens configuration meets your needs.
How to choose by use
- For everyday wear and driving: Compare the Heavy Tropix, Burnet Mid and RB4420 based on your fit and whether you prefer polarized lenses. For the RB4420, check the exact lens option rather than relying on the model name.
- For sports and outdoor use: Consider the wraparound RadarLock Path for side coverage or the cord-based Ombraz Classics if their unconventional fit appeals to you. Confirm the lens configuration and UV label before purchase.
- For a lower-cost pair: The Tifosi Swank is the review’s value pick, but confirm whether the chosen colorway is polarized and whether the nosepiece feels comfortable.
- For an oversized designer look: The Canada Goose Moraine may suit wider faces; try it on if possible if you have a narrower face.
Prices and availability
Travel + Leisure listed prices at the retailers named in its review when accessed; these are not guaranteed current prices. The review did not state a price for the Canada Goose Moraine, Oakley RadarLock Path or Ray-Ban RB4420. Availability, price and lens options can change, so verify the exact product and configuration with the seller.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




