The Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company (SRC), which is owned by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), launched the Kingdom’s first residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) transaction in August 2025, according to SRC. The Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) had announced no-objection clearance for SRC to launch domestic RMBS on 21 August. The move creates a route for housing-finance lenders to package mortgage portfolios for investors; it does not mean SRC is offering mortgages directly to homebuyers.
What SRC’s RMBS launch means
RMBS are securities backed by pools of residential mortgage or home-financing assets. In the model SRC describes, portfolios are aggregated and packaged into securities that can be offered to domestic and international investors. That makes RMBS a secondary-market funding mechanism: lenders can receive liquidity or balance-sheet capacity by transferring or refinancing portfolios, while investors gain exposure to the cash flows associated with housing finance.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
PIF says SRC was established in 2017 to develop Saudi housing finance and enable originators to provide short- and long-term home financing. It funds lenders rather than selling mortgages directly to consumers. PIF’s SRC portfolio profile describes that role.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How the transaction fits the mortgage funding chain
- Lenders originate home financing. Banks and other originators provide financing to homebuyers and build residential financing portfolios.
- SRC provides a refinancing channel. SRC’s stated business includes aggregating and packaging home-financing portfolios, which can provide liquidity or help lenders optimize balance-sheet capacity.
- Investors buy securities backed by those portfolios. The securities connect capital-market investors to residential financing assets, broadening potential sources of funding beyond lenders’ own balance sheets.
This describes the intended mechanism, not a demonstrated result for the 2025 issuance. SAMA says the program is intended to strengthen sector financing capacity, establish a securitization framework, reinforce the domestic debt market, broaden the investor base and diversify funding sources. HSBC says the issuance is intended to enhance liquidity and support lenders’ capacity to provide homeownership financing. The public accounts reviewed do not establish how much liquidity the transaction generated or whether it changed lending volumes or borrowing costs.
#1 Best Overall
Timeline: clearance, launch and transaction roles
| Date | Development |
|---|---|
| 2017 | PIF says SRC was established to develop Saudi housing finance and enable originators to offer short- and long-term financing. |
| 21 August 2025 | SAMA announced it had granted SRC no-objection clearance to launch RMBS in the domestic market. SAMA’s announcement said: “The Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) announces granting the Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company a no-objection clearance to launch residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) in the domestic market.” SAMA announcement. |
| 24 August 2025 | SRC described its transaction as the Kingdom’s first RMBS issuance under its local securitization program. SRC announcement. |
| 8 January 2026 | HSBC said it supported the first issuance and acted as sole lead manager, lead coordinator and structuring advisor. HSBC account. |
These milestones are distinct: SAMA’s no-objection clearance was a regulatory step; SRC’s announcement described the issuance; HSBC’s later account identified its roles in the transaction. SRC characterizes the issuance as Shariah-compliant on its about page. That characterization is SRC’s; SAMA’s clearance announcement does not explain the Shariah structure.
What is not yet clear from the public announcements
The announcements reviewed do not state the transaction’s issue amount, currency, coupon or other pricing, maturity, tranche sizes, collateral pool, ratings, credit enhancements, investor allocations or servicing arrangements. They also do not report realized effects on funding costs, market liquidity or mortgage availability. Without those details, it is not possible to assess the securities’ risk-return profile or compare their terms with another issuance.
For a meaningful comparison with future Saudi RMBS transactions, readers would need the issue size and currency; maturity and tranche structure; details of the underlying mortgage pool and underwriting; ratings and credit enhancements; Shariah structure; investor allocation; arranger and servicing roles; and evidence of the effect on lenders’ funding and lending. The public descriptions above do not provide comparable values for those measures.
Recommended Free Tools
Why the launch matters—and what it does not prove
The launch establishes a domestic securitization route for Saudi residential financing portfolios and advances the policy objectives SAMA set out for the program. It may give lenders another way to obtain funding and investors another channel into housing finance. But those are intended mechanisms and potential benefits, not verified outcomes for this transaction. The available announcements confirm the launch and the parties’ stated aims, while leaving the deal’s financial terms and measurable effects undisclosed.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Rank #3
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
