Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Microsoft’s reported interest in Dailymotion was a proposed minority investment, not a takeover or a completed partnership. A February 2014 report said Microsoft was discussing buying roughly 10% of the video platform from its owner, France’s Orange, which was expected to retain control. Even if the investment had gone ahead, it would not by itself have made Dailymotion a credible YouTube rival: that would have required years of work on creators, content, trust, distribution and advertising.
What was Microsoft reportedly considering?
A February 27, 2014 report said Microsoft was discussing a roughly 10% stake in Dailymotion, then owned by Orange. Orange CEO Stéphane Richard reportedly said discussions were taking place but a deal was uncertain, and that Orange would likely remain the majority shareholder. The report also recalled Yahoo’s earlier attempt to acquire a controlling interest, which was blocked by the French government. These were reports about negotiations, not evidence that Microsoft bought the stake or controlled Dailymotion. 2014 report on the talks
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That distinction matters. An equity investment could have given Microsoft a financial interest and a chance to negotiate strategic influence or distribution. It would not automatically have given Microsoft authority over Dailymotion’s product, moderation, advertising sales, content rights or geographic priorities.
Why Microsoft wanted a video counterweight
The reported talks came when Microsoft was competing with Google across search, mobile and online services. The 2014 report connected the idea to Microsoft’s difficulty providing Windows Phone users with a strong YouTube experience. A recognizable alternative could also have supported video discovery through Bing, Windows, Xbox and MSN, and reduced reliance on a platform controlled by a rival.
#1 Best Overall
- HD streaming made simple: With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- Compact without compromises: The sleek design of Roku Streaming Stick won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, and it even powers from your TV alone, plugging into the back and staying out of sight. No wall outlet, no extra cords, no clutter.
- No more juggling remotes: Power up your TV, adjust the volume, and control your Roku device with one remote. Use your voice to quickly search, play entertainment, and more.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
- TV, simplified: With setup that only takes minutes, a simple-to-navigate Home Screen, and an uncluttered remote control that does all you need—Roku makes it easier to watch the TV you love.
Those were possible strategic benefits, not guaranteed results of a 10% stake. A distribution agreement or integration could have been negotiated without Microsoft owning Dailymotion; conversely, ownership alone would not have made users switch. The investment’s value would have depended on what rights and commitments accompanied it.
Why a minority stake would not have been enough
YouTube’s advantage was not simply a large catalog. Its established creators, viewers, subscriptions, search habits, recommendation data, advertising relationships, rights systems and broad device availability reinforced one another. A new or smaller service has to solve a cold-start problem: viewers want videos worth watching, creators want viewers and income, and advertisers want both audience scale and a safe place for their brands.
Microsoft could have helped with money, software, distribution and advertising expertise. But without operational control, it could not necessarily direct Dailymotion to prioritize a U.S. expansion, guarantee creator deals or impose a particular moderation policy. And even with more control, matching YouTube’s audience and accumulated viewing signals would have taken sustained investment rather than a one-time transaction.
What Dailymotion would have needed to build
A product people would choose repeatedly
Preinstallation or prominent placement can introduce a service, but it does not create loyalty. Dailymotion would have needed fast, reliable playback and uploads; strong mobile, web and connected-device experiences; useful search and recommendations; subscriptions, playlists and easy sharing; cross-device continuity; and accurate captions and accessibility features. Live video and short-form formats could broaden use, but only if the service gave viewers a reason to return and creators a practical way to publish.
Rank #2
- 4K streaming made simple:With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- 4K picture quality: With Roku Streaming Stick Plus, watch your favorites with brilliant 4K picture and vivid HDR color.
- Compact without compromises: Our sleek design won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, and it even powers from your TV alone, plugging into the back and staying out of sight. No wall outlet, no extra cords, no clutter.
- No more juggling remotes: Power up your TV, adjust the volume, and control your Roku device with one remote. Use your voice to quickly search, play entertainment, and more.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
A distinctive catalog and recognizable creators
Simply hosting more videos would not have been enough. A serious challenger would have needed funded original and live programming, recognizable creators and media partners, and strong selections in areas such as news, sports, music, gaming and entertainment. Local-language programming could have made the service more relevant outside the United States as well as to multilingual audiences within it.
Rights and quality would have mattered as much as volume. A platform relying on reposted or infringing material might attract views briefly but would put licensing relationships, advertiser confidence and long-term viability at risk. Exclusive programs could help distinguish the service, although they would be costly and would not automatically bring their audiences along.
Creator economics that could earn trust
Creators would need more than an invitation to upload. A credible offer would include clear revenue terms, dependable payments, useful analytics, discoverability, audience and community tools, and support for relevant formats such as live video and sponsorships. Established creators might also expect migration support or guaranteed payments, but those subsidies would be expensive unless the platform could turn them into durable audiences.
Dailymotion’s current help pages describe creator and partner monetization subject to eligibility and country availability, while its Premium Creator program offers reviewed applicants enhanced visibility, monetization and tools. Those current programs show the kinds of creator services a platform can offer; they do not establish what terms were available in 2014 or guarantee income for every creator. Creator program information, Video monetization guidance and Premium Creator program
Rank #3
- Stunning 4K and Dolby Vision streaming made simple: With America’s number 1 TV streaming platform,* exploring popular apps—plus tons of free movies, shows, and live TV—is as easy as it is fun. *Based on hours streamed—Hypothesis Group
- Breathtaking picture quality: Stunningly sharp 4K picture brings out rich detail in your entertainment with four times the resolution of HD. Watch as colors pop off your screen and enjoy lifelike clarity with Dolby Vision and HDR10+.
- Seamless streaming for any room: With Roku Streaming Stick 4K, watch your favorite entertainment on any TV in the house, even in rooms farther from your router thanks to the long-range Wi-Fi receiver.
- Shows on the go: Take your TV to-go when traveling—without needing to log into someone else’s device.
- Compact without compromises: Our sleek design won’t block neighboring HDMI ports, so you can switch from streaming to gaming with ease. Plus, it’s designed to stay hidden behind your TV, keeping wires neatly out of sight
Copyright, moderation and advertiser safety
A platform that wants major creators, rights holders and advertisers needs workable rules and consistent enforcement. That means copyright reporting and appeals, repeat-infringer measures, tools to identify matching video, human review for difficult cases, controls for advertisers and transparent reporting. Weak enforcement can alienate rights holders and brands; opaque or inconsistent enforcement can alienate creators.
Moderation also has a financial dimension. Removing or restricting content can reduce what a creator earns, while leaving harmful or infringing material available can drive away advertisers and users. Dailymotion’s terms describe moderation and actions that can affect monetization, and its transparency reports discuss enforcement and technical tools. These documents establish that such systems are part of its present operating framework; they do not prove that every past problem was solved. Dailymotion terms of use, 2024 prohibited-content transparency report and 2024 report on terrorist and violent extremist content
How Microsoft could have helped with distribution
Microsoft had potential routes to put Dailymotion in front of audiences through Windows, Windows Phone, Xbox, Bing, MSN and its advertising products. It could also have pursued publisher and connected-device relationships. The strongest version of the plan would pair prominent placement with a product good enough to keep viewers and a clear reason for creators to publish there.
Distribution is not the same as owning a video network. Microsoft’s current MSN guidelines distinguish third-party videos embedded from services such as YouTube or Dailymotion from content ingested through partner feeds and rehosted on MSN. That is evidence of a distribution relationship in some workflows, not of Microsoft owning or operating Dailymotion. MSN video content guidelines
Rank #4
- The Google TV Streamer (4K) delivers your favorite entertainment quickly, easily, and personalized to you[1,2]
- HDMI 2.1 cable required (sold separately)
- See movies and TV shows from all your services right from your home screen[2]; and find new things to watch with tailored recommendations for everyone in your home based on their interests and viewing habits
- Watch live TV and access over 800 free channels from Pluto TV, Tubi, and more[3]; if you find an interesting show or movie on your TV, mobile app, or Google search, you can easily add it to your watchlist, so it’s ready when you are[2]
- Up to 4K HDR with Dolby Vision delivers captivating, true-to-life detail[4]; and you can connect speakers that support Dolby Atmos for more immersive 3D sound
The timing also mattered. Windows Phone did not become a major global mobile ecosystem, which limited the potential reach of a phone-centered strategy. That is broader strategic context, not proof that the Dailymotion proposal caused or could have prevented the platform’s outcome.
Which market would have offered a realistic opening?
Trying to reproduce all of YouTube for all viewers would have put Dailymotion in a direct contest with an entrenched general-purpose service. A more plausible plan would have focused on areas where Dailymotion and partners could offer a recognizable advantage: premium publisher video, news, sports clips and live events, licensed music and programming, multilingual catalogs, brand-safe advertising or embedded video for publishers.
That focus involves a trade-off. A curated, professional service can be easier to position for rights holders and advertisers, but may have less of the open-ended participation that drives a mass video community. A broad upload platform can attract more kinds of creators, but brings heavier moderation, copyright and brand-safety demands. Microsoft and Orange would have needed to decide which kind of business they were willing to fund.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Could the business have paid for itself?
A viable platform would need to coordinate viewers, creators, rights holders and advertisers rather than rely on one revenue source. Advertising across a website, apps and embedded players could support free viewing; publisher deals, branded content, licensing, live-event partnerships and professional hosting could provide additional business. Subscriptions might offer predictable revenue, but viewers would need exclusive or otherwise compelling content to justify paying.
Best Value
- Essential 4K streaming – Get everything you need to stream in brilliant 4K Ultra HD with High Dynamic Range 10+ (HDR10+).
- The newest Fire TV experience (2026) – Our biggest update to Fire TV has a new, modern design that gets you to your entertainment fast. Browse dedicated content categories, pin more of your favorite apps, and get personalized recommendations from Alexa+. Spend less time scrolling, and more time watching.
- Make your TV even smarter – Fire TV gives you instant access to a world of content, tailor-made recommendations, and Alexa, all backed by fast performance.
- All your favorite apps in one place – Experience endless entertainment with access to Prime Video, Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, Apple TV+, HBO Max, Hulu, Peacock, Paramount+, and thousands more. Easily discover what to watch from hundreds of thousands of movies and TV episodes (subscription fees may apply), including free, ad-supported content.
- Getting set up is easy – Plug in and connect to Wi-Fi for smooth streaming.
Dailymotion’s current materials describe advertising across its services and embedded players, creator monetization, and professional video products. A 2025 announcement about Dailymotion Pro and Brut describes a professional-video direction, while its current overview also covers live and on-demand content. These are features of the present business, not proof that any single revenue model would have made the hypothetical 2014 strategy profitable. Dailymotion service overview and 2025 Dailymotion Pro and Brut announcement
The economics would have required patience. Better recommendations need viewing data; more viewing requires compelling content; creators want an audience and reliable income; advertisers want both scale and safety. The companies would have had to subsidize some part of that cycle while building the others. A minority stake would not have removed the costs of infrastructure, rights, moderation, advertising technology and creator acquisition.
What happened to the proposed Microsoft tie-up?
The available evidence does not show that the reported Microsoft investment was completed. Dailymotion’s corporate materials now identify CANAL+ as its owner, and a 2025 announcement says Dailymotion acquired Mojo, a social-video creation platform, to strengthen its creation tools and creator offering. Current product materials emphasize video discovery, advertising, publisher distribution, creator programs and professional video services—not a Microsoft-led attempt to replace YouTube. Dailymotion’s Mojo acquisition announcement
Recommended Free Tools
In practical terms, Microsoft could have added capital, distribution and leverage against Google, but the reported stake alone could not have delivered YouTube-scale competition. The best chance would have been a long-term, focused strategy: make Dailymotion valuable to a defined audience, give creators and rights holders reliable reasons to participate, and use Microsoft’s reach to help the service grow without mistaking placement for loyalty.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
