Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallElon Musk threatened legal action against Apple on August 11, 2025, arguing that Apple’s App Store favored OpenAI by leaving X and Grok out of its “Must-Have” editorial feature. X Corp. and xAI followed with a lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI on August 25. The parties dispute what Apple’s curation shows: the complaint presents plaintiffs’ allegations, while Apple says it uses objective criteria and points to other AI apps that reached high rankings. No ruling on the antitrust claims is established by the latest court record covered here.
What prompted Musk’s threat?
On August 11, 2025, Musk posted on X asking why X and Grok were absent from Apple’s “Must-Have” section. He pointed to X’s position in News and Grok’s position overall, then alleged that Apple’s conduct made it impossible for AI companies other than OpenAI to reach number one in the App Store. He wrote that xAI would take “immediate legal action.” The Associated Press reported the post and Apple’s response the next day: AP’s account of Musk’s threat and Apple’s response.
At that point Musk had not given further details about the proposed action. The dispute centered on the difference between an app’s position in a chart and whether Apple chose to feature it in an editorially curated section.
Are App Store chart rankings and “Must-Have” featuring the same thing?
No. Category charts, such as Top Free apps in News or Productivity, rank apps within a category. “Must-Have Apps” is an editorial feature curated by Apple. An app can rank highly in a category chart without appearing in that featured section; absence from the feature alone does not establish why it was omitted.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThe distinction matters because the rankings cited in the later lawsuit were a dated snapshot, not a continuing audit of app popularity or proof of manipulation. The complaint says that on August 24, 2025, X ranked first among free News apps and Grok second among free Productivity apps, while neither appeared in “Must-Have Apps.” Those positions and the comparison are the plaintiffs’ statements in their filing, not independent findings. The complaint filed by X Corp. and xAI describes their account.
Did xAI actually sue Apple?
Yes. X Corp. and xAI filed a 61-page complaint against Apple and OpenAI in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on August 25, 2025. The Associated Press reported that the suit sought monetary damages and an order barring the conduct alleged by the plaintiffs: AP’s report on the filed lawsuit.
The complaint alleges a broader antitrust arrangement involving Apple’s ChatGPT integration, app visibility, and competition in smartphone and generative-AI-chatbot markets. Those are allegations by X Corp. and xAI; filing a complaint does not establish that the claims are true or that Apple or OpenAI violated antitrust law.
What did Apple say?
In a statement to AP on August 12, 2025, Apple said: “The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias.” It described its discovery features as charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria. The statement explained Apple’s general account of App Store discovery, but did not itself adjudicate the claims raised later in court.
In a brief filed September 30, 2025, supporting its motion to dismiss, Apple said employees had explained why Grok was not included in certain lists and identified improvements that could help the plaintiffs qualify for curated lists. Apple also argued that Gemini, DeepSeek, and Perplexity had reached top App Store rankings after Apple integrated ChatGPT. These points are Apple’s arguments in litigation, not findings by a court. Read Apple’s motion-to-dismiss brief.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is known about the case’s later status?
A court order dated August 26, 2026, denied the Washington Free Beacon’s motion to intervene to challenge the sealing of limited records. That was a procedural decision about access to records, not a ruling on whether Apple or OpenAI violated antitrust law. The order is available here.
The court materials covered here do not establish developments after that order. They therefore do not support describing the underlying case as currently pending, dismissed, settled, or decided.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
