For the year from Jan. 20, 2025, through Jan. 19, 2026, CSI Aviation ranked first among U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) contractors by contract obligations in an analysis by the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) and American University’s Investigative Reporting Workshop (IRW). The ranking counts obligated federal dollars, not the maximum possible value of awards. GEO Group ranked second and Acquisition Logistics third; CoreCivic ranked fifth.
Largest ICE contractors by obligations, Jan. 20, 2025–Jan. 19, 2026
POGO and IRW analyzed ICE contract obligations over this one-year period, aggregating amounts by recipient parent company. The figures below are the amounts and rankings identified in their 2026 analysis; they are not lifetime totals or contract ceilings.
| Rank | Company | Obligations or reported spending | What it does for ICE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSI Aviation | Ranked the largest contractor by contract revenue in POGO/IRW’s analysis; a dollar amount is not stated in the cited findings. | Domestic flights and international removal flights. |
| 2 | GEO Group | About $710 million in direct ICE obligations during the year after Jan. 20, 2025, compared with $713 million in the preceding 365-day period. | Detention operations and related services. |
| 3 | Acquisition Logistics | ICE spending of $598.4 million in 2025, following an award worth up to $1.2 billion for a detention-facility project at Fort Bliss. | Detention-facility project at Fort Bliss. |
| 5 | CoreCivic | About $269 million in ICE obligations in the year after Jan. 20, 2025, up from $185.3 million in the preceding year. | Detention operations and related services. |
The supplied findings identify these ranks and amounts but do not provide a complete company-by-company table for every position. They therefore do not establish the fourth-place contractor or all other ranks.
What “biggest contract” means in this ranking
POGO and IRW downloaded transaction-level data from USAspending.gov on Jan. 29, 2026. They selected awards under ICE, excluding other Department of Homeland Security agencies, used Federal Action Obligation, and grouped recipients by parent company. Where the federal data did not identify the parent for Akima Infrastructure Protection and Akima Global Services, the investigators attributed them to NANA Regional Corporation.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
USAspending.gov defines an obligation as “a promise made by the government to spend funds.” That is different from the maximum potential value of an award, which may include options that are not exercised, and from a contractor’s total revenue across all years or business relationships. For example, the $598.4 million reported as ICE spending on Acquisition Logistics in 2025 is not the same measure as the Fort Bliss award’s “up to $1.2 billion” ceiling.
The GEO Group figure is for direct ICE obligations and excludes revenue from ICE subcontracts, according to POGO. A parent-company roll-up can also differ from a list of individual legal recipients. Those distinctions matter whenever rankings use the broad phrase “largest contractor.”
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
ICE spending was concentrated among a small group
POGO and IRW reported that ICE obligations rose about 69% compared with the previous 365-day period. Almost 70%—about $3.8 billion of roughly $5.4 billion in obligations—went to the top ten contractors during Jan. 20, 2025–Jan. 19, 2026. These are findings from that analysis and time window, not a current real-time spending total.
A separate analysis finds a wider company footprint
In a distinct analysis published Aug. 19, 2026, The Appeal reported that ICE had awarded $8.4 billion to more than 1,100 companies since Jan. 20, 2025. That total should not be added to or directly compared with POGO/IRW’s roughly $5.4 billion: the analyses cover different windows and report different measures. The Appeal also says ICE contractors operate in nearly every state and Washington, D.C., and provides a searchable database for looking up businesses by geography.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThe Appeal’s analysis describes spending across a wider range of suppliers, including about $154 million for combat training, weapons and related equipment; $52 million for office furniture; $4.3 million for roofing contractors; $1.2 million for interior design services; and $2.1 million for parking leases. The Appeal also reported that CoreCivic and GEO Group had each received more than $1 billion in ICE contracts since the start of the second Trump administration. Its database covers direct ICE contracts; subcontracting and financing relationships can extend the agency’s financial footprint beyond those direct awards.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How contractors and ICE responded
Company and agency statements are responses, not independent verification of the contract data. A Palantir spokesperson told POGO and IRW by email, “We’re very proud of our growing work with the U.S. government.” CSI Aviation corporate counsel R. Crawford Moore rejected suggestions that political activity explained the company’s ICE work, saying “nothing could be further from the truth.”
Rank #4
CoreCivic spokesperson Ryan Gustin said, “We don’t cut corners on care, staff, or training, which meets, and in many cases exceeds, our government partners’ standards.” An ICE spokesperson told POGO/IRW, “ICE complies with all judicial directives and congressional oversight requirements.”
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Sources and methodology
- POGO and IRW’s ICE contractor analysis and methodology, including its Jan. 20, 2025–Jan. 19, 2026 window and USAspending.gov data approach.
- The Appeal’s ICE contracts analysis and searchable company database, published Aug. 19, 2026.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Recommended Free Tools
