What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
On December 4, 2024, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said it would be “profoundly un-American” for Elon Musk to use political power to hurt competitors and benefit his own companies. Altman was warning about a potential conflict of interest—not accusing Musk of having already used government authority against OpenAI. He also said he did not think Musk would do so.
What Altman said at the DealBook Summit
At The New York Times DealBook Summit on December 4, 2024, Altman said: “It would be profoundly un-American to use political power, to the degree that Elon has it, to hurt your competitors and advantage your own businesses.” Fortune reported the fuller wording; some headlines shortened it to “un-American.”
The surrounding remarks matter. Altman said he was “not that worried” and did not think Musk would use political influence to harm rivals. His statement was a hypothetical warning and an appeal to a norm against using public power for private commercial advantage, not evidence that Musk had carried out such an intervention. TechCrunch covered the summit remarks and their context.
Why Musk’s political influence raised the question
At the time, Musk was a prominent ally of President-elect Donald Trump and was expected to lead the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, alongside Vivek Ramaswamy. The initiative was described in contemporaneous coverage as an outside advisory effort focused on government spending and regulation, not a conventional cabinet department. The Associated Press reported on the incoming-administration context.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute#1 Best Overall
That distinction is important: political access and influence are not the same as formal authority to direct an agency or regulate a company. The concern was that someone advising an incoming administration might help shape priorities or discussions in policy areas that affect businesses in which that person has a financial stake. The reports about Altman’s comment do not establish that DOGE had authority over OpenAI or that Musk could unilaterally order action against it.
How Musk’s business interests overlapped with OpenAI
Musk owned xAI, which contemporaneous coverage described as an OpenAI competitor. Inc. reported on the rivalry and the political context. Government choices involving AI regulation, public procurement, funding, infrastructure, competition, or national security could matter to companies in the sector.
That overlap created a potential conflict-of-interest question: how should decision-makers handle advice from a person whose companies could be affected by policy? The existence of a potential conflict does not by itself establish favoritism or misconduct. A claim of improper intervention would require evidence of a specific decision or action and the role Musk played in it.
The business and legal dispute behind the remarks
Altman and Musk were both associated with OpenAI’s founding in 2015. Musk left its board in 2018, and the relationship deteriorated as OpenAI expanded its commercial operations and Musk started xAI. The dispute involved more than personal friction: it centered on OpenAI’s mission, governance, commercial structure, and direction of AI development.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →In 2024, Musk sued OpenAI and Altman, alleging that OpenAI had moved away from its founding commitment to develop AI for broad public benefit and toward prioritizing profit. OpenAI disputed Musk’s claims. These are opposing positions in a legal dispute, not findings that OpenAI had abandoned its mission or that Musk’s allegations were established facts. TechCrunch summarized the litigation background.
Altman was also not a detached observer: he led OpenAI, the company competing with Musk’s xAI and named in Musk’s lawsuit. That context is relevant when weighing his comments, but it does not change what he said or establish that his concern was unfounded.
What the quote does—and does not—show
- It shows: Altman recognized Musk’s expected political influence and publicly argued that using it to advantage one’s own businesses at competitors’ expense would violate an important civic norm.
- It also shows: Altman said he did not expect Musk to cross that line.
- It does not show: that Musk had directed a government action against OpenAI, that DOGE had regulatory authority over the company, or that Altman cited evidence of a specific planned intervention.
The broader governance issue
Technology executives can participate in policy discussions while owning businesses affected by those policies. The practical questions are whether financial interests are disclosed, whether decision-makers can recuse themselves where appropriate, and whether public decisions are made transparently and on defensible grounds. Political advocacy, access, and policy disagreement are not automatically improper; the concern is whether public authority is used to secure private advantage.
Altman’s December 2024 remarks brought that issue into view through a particularly direct rivalry. He warned against using political power to harm competitors, while saying he believed Musk would not do it. The available reporting documents the warning and the circumstances that prompted it, not an instance of Musk using government power against OpenAI.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteQuick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
