The reported $50 million lawsuit against Priscilla Presley is not about Elvis Presley’s death. Former business partners Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko sued Presley in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging fraud and breach of contract. The death-related allegation reported in connection with the case concerns Presley’s daughter, Lisa Marie Presley, and remains an allegation—not a court finding.
What the $50 million lawsuit alleges
The Associated Press reported on August 13, 2025, that Kruse and Fialko sought more than $50 million in damages. They allege that Presley used their work and investment to build her brand while concealing an earlier agreement affecting the rights to license her name. The requested damages are not an award, and the allegations have not been established by a court.
According to the plaintiffs’ account, their work included helping broker a 2023 agreement related to the dispute between Presley and her granddaughter, Riley Keough, over Lisa Marie Presley’s estate. They say the agreement secured Presley a $2.4 million payment, after which Presley ended their business relationship. These details are allegations reported from the complaint, not independently established findings.
Why Elvis’s death is not the subject
The lawsuit’s reported death-related allegation concerns Lisa Marie Presley, who died in 2023—not Elvis Presley. The plaintiffs allege that Priscilla Presley acted in relation to Lisa Marie’s life-support decisions to improve her position in the family estate dispute. This is an exceptionally serious claim made in a civil lawsuit; it is not a court determination. Presley’s lawyer denied the allegations.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors#1 Best Overall
The earlier name-rights agreement in the dispute
Kruse and Fialko alleged that Presley had previously made a deal with Elvis Presley Enterprises affecting the licensing of her name. The Associated Press reported that the plaintiffs described the 2005 agreement as worth $6.5 million. That figure and the account of the agreement come from the plaintiffs’ allegations, not a judicial finding.
What each side says
Kruse and Fialko’s lawyer, Jordan Matthews, said his clients invested substantial time and money in Presley’s brand and were betrayed. As quoted by the Associated Press, Matthews said: “the evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley’s brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved.” This is the plaintiffs’ lawyer’s advocacy, not a finding by a court.
Rank #2
Presley’s attorney denied the claims. The Associated Press also reported that Presley had sued Kruse and Fialko the prior year, alleging elder abuse and fraud. The parties’ accusations belong to separate sides of a broader business dispute; neither should be presented as proven fact on the basis of the reports cited here.
How the lawsuit relates to the estate dispute
The business lawsuit and the family dispute over Lisa Marie Presley’s estate are related in the plaintiffs’ account of the 2023 agreement, but they are not the same proceeding. The reported claim against Priscilla Presley is a business case brought by former partners. The estate conflict involving Riley Keough is separate background, and it should not be conflated with the $50 million damages request.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #3
What is known about the case status
The available reporting establishes that Kruse and Fialko filed the case in Los Angeles Superior Court, but a reliable current docket entry, ruling, settlement, or dismissal for this specific California action could not be verified. A Tennessee appellate docket concerns a different Presley matter and does not establish the status of this lawsuit. A copy of the complaint hosted by a third party is not an official court docket.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Established in reporting: former business partners sued Presley in Los Angeles Superior Court, and the reported claims include fraud and breach of contract.
- Still allegations: the plaintiffs’ accounts of the name-rights deal, the 2023 payment, and Lisa Marie’s life-support decisions.
- Not established here: whether the California case has since been resolved or what a court may ultimately decide.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
