The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The Post Office scandal became a major UK news story again in early 2024 after ITV broadcast Mr Bates vs The Post Office. The drama brought the issue to a broader audience, as ministers acknowledged at the time, and was followed within days by plans for legislation to quash qualifying convictions. It did not start the scandal or resolve every case: campaigning, court action and the public inquiry were already under way.
Why did the scandal return to the news in 2024?
The immediate catalyst was ITV’s four-part drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office, broadcast in early January. The programme told the story of the Horizon accounting system and the sub-postmasters whose accounts appeared to show unexplained shortfalls. ITV reported that the final episode drew more than 10.3 million viewers; that is ITV’s reported audience figure, not a measure of unique viewers.
Political discussion followed quickly. On 8 January 2024, Kevin Hollinrake, then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade, told the House of Commons that the drama had brought understanding of the Horizon scandal “to a much broader audience.” That was a minister’s contemporaneous assessment of its reach, not proof that the programme alone caused the government’s later decisions.
The renewed attention landed on a long-running campaign and legal dispute. Horizon, supplied by Fujitsu, was introduced in 1999. Sub-postmasters later reported account discrepancies. Between 2016 and 2019, 555 claimants—mostly postmasters, alongside other staff and employees—took the Post Office to the High Court. The 2019 judgments were sharply critical of Horizon and the Post Office’s conduct.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors#1 Best Overall
What changed politically and legally?
10 January: legislation announced
On 10 January 2024, the government announced plans for primary legislation intended to quash relevant convictions and support compensation. It also said members of the Group Litigation Order (GLO) cohort would receive at least £75,000 upfront. These were separate parts of the response: a route to overturn certain convictions and financial redress for eligible people.
24 May: the Act received Royal Assent
The Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024 received Royal Assent and came into effect on 24 May, according to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The CCRC says the Act removed the need for most people within its scope to apply individually to the appeal court or the CCRC to have their convictions overturned.
The Act was not a blanket resolution of every case. Its effect depends on whether a conviction meets the Act’s qualifying conditions. Readers should not assume that every person affected by Horizon, or every conviction associated with the Post Office, was automatically covered.
How did compensation differ from conviction quashing?
Overturning a conviction and receiving compensation are distinct matters. The Act addressed qualifying convictions; redress was handled through separate schemes for different groups. A person’s eligibility and route depended on their circumstances and the scheme involved.
One dated example is the GLO offer. Department for Business and Trade figures published for 1 March 2024 recorded 110 accepted offers, with more than 100 claimants choosing the £75,000 full-and-final option. The department described that fixed payment as inclusive of interest. This is a snapshot for that date, not a year-end total or a current count.
What else was happening during the year?
The public inquiry continued alongside legislation and compensation activity. It began as a judicial inquiry in 2020 and became a statutory inquiry in June 2021, chaired by Sir Wyn Williams. The legislation did not replace the inquiry’s work.
Rank #4
Fujitsu witnesses appeared in inquiry proceedings from 16 to 19 January 2024. In its 19 January report, ITV said Fujitsu’s European boss acknowledged that some witness statements used in prosecutions were misleading because they omitted the company’s provision of incomplete audit data. This is ITV’s account of evidence given to the inquiry.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the 2024 turning point did—and did not—mean
The drama made an existing scandal newly prominent, and the speed of the public and political response was striking. But the underlying story had been developing for years through sub-postmasters’ campaigning, litigation and the inquiry. The legislation established a faster route for qualifying convictions; it did not settle every person’s legal position or make the separate redress schemes interchangeable.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
