Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The U.S. Justice Department proposed forcing Google to sell Chrome in 2024, but a federal judge rejected that remedy in the final judgment issued December 5, 2025. Google is not currently required to sell Chrome. The judgment instead imposes restrictions on certain distribution deals and requires specified data access and search syndication; the case remains in appellate proceedings.
What the DOJ proposed
The proposal came from the search-monopoly case, in which the court had found Google unlawfully maintained a monopoly in key online-search markets. The DOJ and participating states argued that Google’s distribution arrangements helped preserve that position. Their proposed remedy was a request to the court—not an order already in force.
The plaintiffs’ November 2024 proposal called for Google to divest Chrome and relevant operating assets, with the Chromium open-source project included in the proposed framework. It also sought restrictions on Google favoring its search business through Chrome and other products, limits on exclusive distribution agreements, and obligations involving search data and syndication. The proposal included Android-related conditions, including a possible divestiture option if behavioral restrictions proved inadequate. The plaintiffs revised their proposal in March 2025, while continuing to seek Chrome divestiture.
Read the DOJ’s initial proposed final judgment and its revised proposal.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
- SLIM. LIGHTWEIGHT. READY TO GO: The all-new slim design is perfect for busy lives on the go.
- SKILLFULLY DESIGNED. MILITARY TOUGH: Built with premium craftsmanship to withstand the occasional drop or ding.
- ALL-DAY, ALL-IN-ONE CHARGING: Power through your school day – and beyond – with a long-lasting 12-hour battery.¹
- 3X FASTER THAN THE PREVIOUS GENERATION OF WIFI: Crush your schoolwork in record time with Wi-Fi that’s three times faster than the previous generation of Wi-Fi.
- YOUR PHONE AND CHROMEBOOK WORK BETTER TOGETHER: Easily transfer files between devices, and control your phone right from your Chromebook.
Why Chrome was part of the case
The government’s theory was that Chrome is a major route through which people reach search, and that Google’s control of the browser lets it set search defaults and connect browsing with Search, advertising, Android, and other services. The DOJ argued that a separate owner could make Chrome a more independent distribution channel for competing search providers.
This was not an allegation that Chrome’s existence by itself was unlawful. The dispute was about whether Google’s ownership and integration of the browser helped reinforce the search monopoly the court had found. Chrome and Chromium are related but not identical: Chrome is Google’s commercial browser; Chromium is the open-source project on which Chrome and other browsers are based.
Rank #2
- FOR HOME, WORK, & SCHOOL – With an Intel processor, 14-inch display, custom-tuned stereo speakers, and long battery life, this Chromebook laptop lets you knock out any assignment or binge-watch your favorite shows..Voltage:5.0 volts
- HD DISPLAY, PORTABLE DESIGN – See every bit of detail on this micro-edge, anti-glare, 14-inch HD (1366 x 768) display (1); easily take this thin and lightweight laptop PC from room to room, on trips, or in a backpack.
- ALL-DAY PERFORMANCE – Reliably tackle all your assignments at once with the quad-core, Intel Celeron N4120—the perfect processor for performance, power consumption, and value (2).
- 4K READY – Smoothly stream 4K content and play your favorite next-gen games with Intel UHD Graphics 600 (3) (4).
- MEMORY AND STORAGE – Enjoy a boost to your system’s performance with 4 GB of RAM while saving more of your favorite memories with 64 GB of reliable flash-based eMMC storage (5).
What the judge ordered instead
In the December 5, 2025 final judgment, the District Court for the District of Columbia rejected Chrome and Android divestitures and adopted behavioral and access remedies instead. It found the requested structural remedies were not sufficiently proportional to the proven connection between the challenged conduct and the proposed breakups, and considered implementation risks. Rejecting a sale did not erase the court’s underlying monopolization finding or reject every remedy sought by the government.
The final judgment includes, among other measures:
- Restrictions on certain exclusive distribution agreements involving Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and Gemini.
- Requirements to provide specified search-index and user-interaction data to rivals or potential rivals. These are defined access obligations, not unrestricted access to all Google data.
- Search-results and search-text-ad syndication obligations.
- A technical committee and compliance processes to help monitor implementation.
The judgment is scheduled to remain in effect for six years from its effective date, unless it is modified, terminated early, or extended under its terms. See the final judgment and the court’s December 5, 2025 opinion. The DOJ also summarized the remedies in its announcement.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rank #3
- Storage: 16GB Flash Memory
- OS: Chrome OS
- Screen Size: 11.6"
DOJ proposal versus court judgment
| Issue | What plaintiffs proposed | What the final judgment requires |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome | Divest Chrome and relevant assets within a proposed structural remedy. | No sale or divestiture ordered; Google retains Chrome. |
| Android | Restrictions, with a possible divestiture option under the proposal. | No Android divestiture ordered. |
| Distribution deals | Limits on exclusive defaults and preferential treatment. | Restrictions on certain exclusive distribution arrangements. |
| Search data and access | Competitor access to specified data and services. | Defined data, index-access, and syndication obligations. |
| Oversight | Government enforcement of proposed terms. | Technical committee and compliance monitoring. |
What this means for Chrome users
There is no current requirement for Chrome users to switch browsers, change settings, or prepare for a new owner. Google has not been ordered to sell Chrome, and the final judgment does not require Google to make another browser or give up Android.
A forced sale could have raised questions about who controlled defaults, updates, security fixes, privacy practices, and Chrome’s relationship with Chromium and Google services. Those are hypothetical consequences of the rejected remedy, not changes users are currently required to navigate. The judgment restricts certain contracts and conduct; it does not simply prohibit Google from owning Chrome or using Google Search in it.
Rank #4
- Intel Celeron N4120: 4 Cores & Threads, 1.1GHz Base Clock, Up to 2.6GHz Boost Clock, 4MB Cache, Intel UHD Graphics 600. The perfect combination of performance, power consumption, and value helps your device handle multitasking smoothly and reliably with four processing cores to divide up the work.
What happens next
The operative remedy is the December 2025 final judgment, subject to appellate proceedings and compliance monitoring. The DOJ case docket lists appellate filings, including a response brief and cross-appeal filing dated July 28, 2026, as well as status reports concerning implementation. Appeals could lead to further court action, but an appeal by itself does not impose a Chrome-sale requirement. Any change would require additional court action.
The case began in October 2020, the court ruled on Google’s search monopolization in August 2024, and the plaintiffs filed their initial Chrome-sale proposal in November 2024. The court entered its final remedies judgment in December 2025. Current docket materials are available on the DOJ case page. For a legal overview of the court’s remedy decision, see the Congressional Research Service summary.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Do not confuse this with Google’s separate ad-tech case
The Chrome proposal arose from the federal search-monopoly case. Google is also involved in separate federal antitrust litigation concerning advertising technology; that case concerns different markets and proceedings. The Chrome remedy should not be treated as an outcome in that separate matter. The DOJ maintains a separate case page for the advertising-technology litigation.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
