October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsClean PCRecommendedOne scan can reveal what keeps slowing WindowsLook for cleanup and repair opportunities.Run ScanOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Supreme Court Overturns 90-Year Precedent in Trump’s FTC Commissioner Case

The Supreme Court first let Trump’s removal of FTC commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter take effect during litigation. Its 2026 merits ruling then struck down the FTC’s for-cause removal protection and overruled the 1935 precedent that had upheld it.
From TheFinanceBase Team2 min to read

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

The Supreme Court’s 2025 action letting President Donald Trump remove Democratic FTC commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter was only an interim step. On June 29, 2026, the Court ruled 6–3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the law protecting FTC commissioners from removal without cause was unconstitutional—and expressly overruled the 1935 precedent that had upheld that protection.

What happened in 2025—and what the Court decided in 2026

In September 2025, the Supreme Court allowed Slaughter’s removal to take effect while her challenge continued. That order did not resolve the case’s merits. The D.C. Circuit’s September 25, 2025 order describes the dispute at that interim stage, when lower courts treated the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States as controlling. Read the D.C. Circuit’s September 25, 2025 order. Ars Technica also reported on the interim action at the time. Read Ars Technica’s September 2025 report.

The final decision came on June 29, 2026. In a 6–3 ruling, the Supreme Court held that the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protection for commissioners was unconstitutional and overruled Humphrey’s Executor. The Court’s opinion is the primary source for the holding and the opinions in the case. Read the Supreme Court opinion in Trump v. Slaughter. The Congressional Research Service also summarizes the ruling and its effect on the precedent. Read the CRS legal analysis.

What the 90-year-old precedent had established

In 1935, Humphrey’s Executor unanimously upheld Congress’s authority to protect FTC commissioners from removal except for specified cause. The FTC Act identified those grounds as “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” Slaughter’s challenge put that protection—and the precedent supporting it—at the center of the case.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why the majority and dissent disagreed

The majority: commissioners exercising executive power must be removable by the president

The 2026 majority reasoned that FTC commissioners exercise executive power and cannot be insulated from presidential removal in the way the statute provided. On that basis, it struck down the protection and rejected the constitutional rule established by Humphrey’s Executor. This is the binding holding of the Court.

The dissent: preserve the precedent and Congress’s authority to protect independence

The three dissenting justices disputed the majority’s constitutional and historical analysis. They defended Humphrey’s Executor and Congress’s authority to protect the FTC’s independence through removal limits. Those arguments explain the disagreement but did not prevail.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What the decision means—and what it does not establish

The ruling removes the FTC Act’s for-cause barrier to presidential removal of FTC commissioners. It marks a decisive change from the rule that governed the commission under Humphrey’s Executor. The decision described here concerns FTC commissioners; the available ruling does not, by itself, establish how removal protections at other agencies should be treated.

Quick Recap

Rank #4
Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)
  • Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)
  • Foundation Press
  • ABIS_BOOK

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.