Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Indigo’s Terraton Initiative began as an ambitious goal to draw down one trillion tons of atmospheric carbon dioxide through agricultural soils—not as a claim that this amount had already been removed. Its later Terraton Challenge backed ideas for improving sequestration, measuring results and rewarding growers. Indigo’s subsequent carbon-credit program describes payments tied to verified credits sold and ongoing obligations, not an automatic payment for signing up.
What Indigo announced with the Terraton Initiative
In June 2019, Indigo announced the Terraton Initiative, a goal to remove one trillion tons of atmospheric carbon dioxide by optimizing carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. The company framed the initiative as part of building a more sustainable and resilient food system. The scale of the goal was an aspiration, not a tally of completed removals. Indigo’s November 5, 2019 announcement described the related challenge and its ambitions.
Indigo Chief Innovation Officer Geoff von Maltzahn said, “Agriculture represents the most scalable, affordable, and immediate method available to pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.” That was the company’s position, not an independently established consensus conclusion.
What the Terraton Challenge funded
The Terraton Challenge sought projects that could speed soil-carbon sequestration, quantify soil carbon, or create financial offerings that reward growers for capturing and maintaining soil carbon. Indigo reported that the 2019 competition received nearly 300 applications representing 44 countries, with 36 projects advancing as semifinalists. Those are company-reported competition figures, not evidence that the broader Terraton goal was met.
#1 Best Overall
- Semifinalists could compete for grants of up to $60,000.
- Selected finalists with scalable solutions could be eligible for contracts of up to $3 million.
Both amounts describe the 2019 competition’s stated opportunities; they are not farmer payment rates or current program terms. The challenge’s emphasis on practical adoption was captured by judge and Iowa farmer Ben Riensche: “As a farmer, I want to make sure the ideas are practical and scale-able, things real farmers will do on real farms.”
How Indigo’s later carbon-payment model is described
Indigo’s current Carbon by Indigo program page says its standard program returns farmers 75% of the weighted net price paid by buyers for a carbon-credit crop. The page characterizes payments as outcome-based: they relate to carbon sequestered through adopted practices, rather than being a lump sum simply for changing practices. It says Climate Action Reserve issues credits and confirms their eligibility for sale.
Rank #2
The formula does not establish a fixed dollar amount per credit. Indigo says results and earnings are not guaranteed: a farmer’s payment depends on verified credits being generated and sold, continued long-term maintenance of qualifying practices and soil-carbon levels, and a five-year payment schedule. The program page also says a buffer-pool holdback may be up to 20%. These are statements on the current program page, not terms that should be assumed to have applied to the 2019 launch.
A historical rate is not a current quote
On August 29, 2022, Indigo announced that it would pay $30 per verified credit for the specified 2020 and 2021 carbon crop years. Its announcement also described multi-year vesting and a 20% buffer pool of credits that were not eligible for payment. That $30 figure is specific to those crop years and the terms announced in 2022; it is not a guaranteed or current rate. Read Indigo’s historical payment announcement.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Rank #3
How one registered project quantifies soil carbon
The CAR1459 page for Indigo Ag U.S. Project No. 1 identifies registration with Climate Action Reserve under Soil Enrichment Protocol v1.1. Its description says the project uses a hybrid measurement-and-model approach: soil samples initialize the DayCent-CR model, and model outputs are combined with equations from the protocol to quantify soil carbon and greenhouse-gas impacts. The project description says the quantification accounts for sample, measurement and model-prediction error. It also describes additionality requirements and ongoing monitoring for permanence, supported by a 14.5% buffer pool. See the CAR1459 project documentation.
The project’s 14.5% buffer-pool figure is specific to that project description. It is distinct from the current program page’s statement that a buffer-pool holdback may be up to 20%. Neither figure should be generalized to every soil-carbon credit or treated as a complete assessment of credit quality.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What farmers and buyers should check
For a farmer, the key financial distinction is between earning a share of revenue from credits that are verified and sold and receiving a guaranteed payment for adopting a practice. Indigo’s current page describes the former and makes payment conditional. Program eligibility, obligations, timing and expected returns should therefore be checked in the current agreement rather than inferred from an earlier announcement or headline.
For anyone evaluating a soil-carbon credit, useful questions include:
Best Value
- Which registry and protocol govern the project?
- How are baselines and additionality determined?
- Are soil measurements used, and how are models and measurement uncertainty handled?
- What happens if stored carbon is later released, and how is permanence monitored?
- How and when are farmers paid, and what share or holdback applies?
- Which farmers and practices qualify, and how long must those practices continue?
CAR1459’s documentation answers some of these questions for that particular project; it does not establish that all soil-carbon credits use the same rules or methods.
Could paying farmers to sequester carbon reverse climate change?
Paying farmers could help create incentives for practices that store carbon in soils, but the Terraton goal itself does not demonstrate climate impact at that scale. Impact depends on verified outcomes, project rules, durability, and how much adoption is achieved. Indigo’s 2019 announcement and later program materials describe a goal, a competition and a crediting approach; they do not establish that the initiative has reversed climate change or achieved its trillion-ton ambition.
Current-program note
Farmers considering Carbon by Indigo should confirm current geographic and crop eligibility, enrollment availability, payment terms and practice obligations directly with Indigo. Program-page figures and terms may change, and the 2019 competition announcement does not guarantee eligibility or a payment rate today.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
