Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →At least two former Police Digital Service (PDS) employees had employment tribunal proceedings underway or starting in January 2026, according to a Computer Weekly report published on 13 January. The reported claims include harassment, victimisation, sexual discrimination, whistleblowing detriment and unfair constructive dismissal. They are allegations, not findings by a tribunal; the report does not establish later hearing dates or outcomes.
What the report says about the cases
Computer Weekly reported that one former staff member’s case concerned alleged harassment and victimisation. A preliminary hearing in a second case took place during the week commencing 5 January 2026. That case was understood to include allegations of sexual discrimination and whistleblowing detriment, along with an unfair constructive dismissal claim. The report also said sources described further cases as underway or in the pipeline. These details are reported claims, not established facts about what occurred. Computer Weekly’s 13 January report does not provide a tribunal judgment or confirm subsequent outcomes.
Claims are not tribunal findings
An employment tribunal claim sets out allegations for a legal process; it does not, by itself, prove the conduct alleged. The reported terms describe different claims: harassment and victimisation in one case, and sexual discrimination, whistleblowing detriment and unfair constructive dismissal in another. The available report does not establish that a tribunal has upheld any of them.
PDS’s response
A PDS spokesperson told Computer Weekly: “We do not provide comment on any internal personnel matter which is confidential to both the organisation and any individual involved. In relation to employment tribunal claims, like any organisation, we occasionally face claims brought against us and are unable to comment on individual cases.” The report did not name an individual spokesperson or include a substantive response to the allegations.
#1 Best Overall
Workplace context and reported accounts
Computer Weekly said PDS had repeatedly described improving culture and employee engagement at all levels as an organisational priority. Its report said the organisation’s accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025 described culture work as continuing through 2026 and beyond. Sources quoted in the article described morale as low; that is attributed reporting, not a workforce-wide measurement.
The figures below were reported from PDS accounts filed with Companies House on 12 December 2025. They provide financial and workforce context, but do not establish anything about the tribunal allegations.
Rank #2
| Reported figure | Period and qualification |
|---|---|
| £22.3 million Home Office grant | PDS accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025, as reported by Computer Weekly. |
| £2.22 million profit before tax | PDS accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025, as reported by Computer Weekly. The accounts included the release of £3.63 million of deferred income; without that release, they stated there would have been a £1.4 million loss. |
| 15.5% staff turnover | PDS accounts, end of financial year 2024/25, as reported by Computer Weekly. |
| 34% of the workforce were women | PDS accounts for 2024/25, as reported by Computer Weekly. |
Uncertainty about PDS’s future
The report also situated the cases amid proposed policing reforms and uncertainty about PDS’s future. It said a June 2025 letter from then policing minister Diana Johnson described preparation for the transition of relevant capabilities, citing PDS IT functions as an example. The report does not establish that a transfer was finally decided, completed or given a timetable.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is not yet established
The 13 January 2026 report describes proceedings as getting underway that month. It does not establish formal case numbers, later hearing schedules, judgments or outcomes. Its account should therefore be read as a dated report on claims and procedural activity, not as confirmation of the cases’ current status.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #3
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
