Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Sir Alan Bates said in July 2024 that former ministers Ed Davey and Jo Swinson were “handled” by civil servants during the Post Office Horizon scandal. That was Bates’s allegation, not an inquiry finding that officials coordinated a cover-up. The testimony reported at the time gives context: ministers described not being briefed on significant concerns, while Bates argued that officials and the department controlled what reached them.
What did Sir Alan Bates mean by “handled”?
In a Computer Weekly report published on 22 July 2024, Bates, chair of the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance, said the ministers were “tightly controlled” by civil servants and that officials and the department had their own agenda. He summed up his view: “They were being handled the whole time and the department had its own agenda.”
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Politics UK | $51.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
UK POLITICS ANNUAL UPDATE 2026 | $13.60 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Politics UK | $48.17 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Rise of Reform UK: How a Political Movement Changed Britain | $13.32 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality | $10.62 | Buy on Amazon |
Those words describe Bates’s interpretation of how information flowed between officials and ministers. They should not be read as a neutral account or as proof that officials intentionally concealed information. The report’s headline uses “cover-up,” but the material discussed here does not establish that the inquiry found a coordinated civil-service cover-up.
What did the ministers say they knew?
Ed Davey
Davey was the business department minister responsible for the Post Office from 2010 to 2012. As reported by Computer Weekly, he told the inquiry he had assumed he was being told the truth by officials and the Post Office. A briefing prepared before his 2010 meeting with Bates relied on Post Office material asserting that Horizon was reliable.
#1 Best Overall
Jo Swinson
Swinson succeeded Davey and held the role during parts of 2012–15. Computer Weekly’s account of her testimony says she asked questions about prosecutions and relied on officials to pursue answers. The report also describes evidence that officials stopped pursuing some questions that remained unanswered.
Swinson said she had not been briefed on board discussions about the Post Office chief executive or on the plan to remove the independent forensic accountants Second Sight. These examples help explain Bates’s criticism of the information reaching ministers; they do not, on their own, establish why officials acted as they did.
Rank #2
Vince Cable’s testimony on departmental awareness
In official testimony on 25 July 2024, former business secretary Vince Cable said Horizon barely came across his desk during his five years in office. He said: “I think the general reason is that the officials who were briefing me and the ministers on the subject hadn’t seen it as a particular problem.” With hindsight, he told the inquiry, “I should have been told about Mr Bates and the Justice group.”
Cable also accepted general departmental oversight responsibility. His account illustrates why limited awareness and responsibility are separate questions: a minister may say he was not alerted to a problem while still recognizing a duty to oversee the department.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Rank #3
What the testimony does—and does not—show
- It shows that ministers described gaps in their awareness. Davey said he assumed officials and the Post Office were telling him the truth; Swinson’s reported evidence included questions and developments she said she was not briefed on; Cable said Horizon was not seen as a particular problem by those briefing ministers.
- It supports the context for Bates’s allegation. The examples concern how concerns and answers were, or were not, passed up to ministers.
- It does not prove deliberate coordination. The testimony and reporting cited here do not establish that civil servants intentionally coordinated a cover-up. That claim must remain attributed to Bates unless supported by a specific inquiry finding.
- It does not remove ministerial oversight questions. Lack of awareness is not the same as lack of responsibility, as Cable’s acceptance of general departmental responsibility demonstrates.
The officials and department Bates discussed were associated with the Shareholder Executive, which looked after government-owned assets including the Post Office. Computer Weekly notes that the Shareholder Executive is now UK Government Investments (UKGI).
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How later inquiry context relates to the 2024 allegation
In July 2025, inquiry chair Wyn Williams presented part one of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report. Computer Weekly’s explainer on the scandal summarized the report as estimating that at least 10,000 people were impacted to differing degrees. That figure describes the scandal’s reported human reach; it does not measure civil-service conduct or prove Bates’s specific allegation about how Davey and Swinson were treated.
The distinction matters: the inquiry’s broader examination of the scandal and its consequences is not, by itself, a finding about the intent or conduct of every official involved in ministerial briefings. A person-specific conclusion about those officials requires evidence and findings directed to their actions.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
