Before the 2026 FIFA World Cup, selected U.S. host-city hotel dates showed weaker bookings than selected dates in Mexico. That early snapshot did not establish how the three countries performed over the tournament as a whole. After the event, U.S. host markets recorded substantial hotel revenue and RevPAR gains—but the available figures do not support declaring a definitive hotel winner among the United States, Canada and Mexico.
What the pre-tournament booking data showed
A June 9, 2026 report citing CoStar booking data found a 57% hotel booking rate in New York City for the June 13 match date. The same report gave rates of 60% in Monterrey for June 20, 61% in Mexico City for June 11, and 73% in Guadalajara for June 18. These were snapshots for different cities and dates, not a controlled comparison of national hotel demand. The figures were reported by Front Office Sports.
| City | Match date in the snapshot | Reported booking rate |
|---|---|---|
| New York City | June 13, 2026 | 57% |
| Monterrey | June 20, 2026 | 60% |
| Mexico City | June 11, 2026 | 61% |
| Guadalajara | June 18, 2026 | 73% |
These are forward booking rates, not final occupancy, hotel revenue, or a full-tournament average. The reported city-date selection also does not establish how Canada compared with either neighbor.
Why U.S. hoteliers expected softer demand
The American Hotel & Lodging Association’s May 4, 2026 outlook surveyed hoteliers in 11 U.S. host markets. Eighty percent of respondents said bookings were below their initial forecasts. AHLA also reported that 65–70% said visa barriers and broader geopolitical concerns were significantly suppressing international demand. Its account identified rising costs and FIFA room-block releases as additional constraints; roughly half of respondents in host markets reported material releases. AHLA described early FIFA room commitments as an artificial demand signal that later recalibrated. See the AHLA outlook.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match#1 Best Overall
- Inspired by the world's largest soccer matchup, the adidas FIFA World Cup 26 soccer ball pairs design with performance. A seamless TSBE surface enhances touch. The butyl bladder ensures consistent shape retention for every match or practice session.
- TSBE TECHNOLOGY: Seamless surface for better touch and lower water uptake
- KEEPS ITS SHAPE: Butyl bladder for best air retention
- REQUIRES INFLATION: Ships flat, pump not included
- FIFA QUALITY AND OFFICIALLY LICENSED: Officially licensed by FIFA, the ball passed FIFA tests on circumference, weight, rebound and water absorption
Those survey responses describe hoteliers’ expectations and reported pressures, not a controlled test of what caused booking rates in any particular city. The June reporting also pointed to the total cost of attending—tickets, lodging and transit—and difficulty entering the United States for some international fans. These are plausible headwinds, not proof that any one factor explains the cross-city differences.
AHLA President and CEO Rosanna Maietta said: “Hotels across host markets have spent years preparing for the World Cup, and while there is real excitement, the data points to a more nuanced outlook,”
What happened to U.S. hotel performance after the tournament
Retrospective analysis by Tourism Economics, published September 18, 2026, showed that weak early booking expectations did not mean U.S. hotels received no event-related benefit. It estimated approximately $633.8 million in incremental hotel room revenue in U.S. host markets on and around match dates. On match dates, host-market hotel room revenue was up 36.3% year over year, with the increase driven largely by room rates. These are U.S. hotel measures, not a like-for-like comparison with Mexico or Canada. See Tourism Economics.
For June and July, RevPAR—revenue per available room—grew 14.6% in U.S. host markets and 11.3% in adjacent markets, compared with 6.8% in U.S. non-host areas. The pattern indicates a measurable lift concentrated in host and nearby markets. Because the match-date revenue gain was largely rate-driven, stronger revenue does not by itself demonstrate a comparable increase in occupied rooms.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsTourism Economics also noted that broader inbound travel remained weak, although arrivals from countries participating in the World Cup performed better than arrivals from non-participating countries. That context helps explain why a major event could boost hotel results in host markets without resolving wider travel-demand pressures.
Rank #2
- Inspired by the iconic "la ola" wave among the crowd, the adidas FIFA World Cup 26 Trionda League Soccer Ball features a seamless TSBE surface for precise touch and reduced water uptake. A butyl bladder ensures shape retention.
- TSBE TECHNOLOGY: Seamless surface for better touch and lower water uptake
- KEEPS ITS SHAPE: Butyl bladder for best air retention
- REQUIRES INFLATION: Ships flat, pump not included
- FIFA QUALITY AND OFFICIALLY LICENSED: Officially licensed by FIFA, the ball passed FIFA tests on circumference, weight, rebound and water absorption
What Mexico’s post-event figures do—and do not—measure
Mexico’s Tourism Secretariat reported 7.8 million domestic and international travelers in host cities and tourism spending of more than 42 billion pesos. The government summary aggregated information from state tourism offices, Datatur’s hotel-monitoring system, business groups, AirDNA, airport groups and other organizations. It is a broad tourism measure, not a hotel-only total or a figure directly comparable with the U.S. estimate of incremental hotel room revenue. See the Secretaría de Turismo.
In particular, traveler counts do not equal hotel guests or occupied room nights, and overall tourism spending is not the same metric as hotel room revenue. The figures show substantial tourism activity in Mexico’s host cities, but they cannot establish that Mexican hotels outperformed U.S. hotels.
So, did U.S. hotels lose out to Canada and Mexico?
The answer depends on what “lose out” means. In the June snapshot, some selected U.S. match dates had lower reported booking rates than selected dates in Mexico. AHLA’s May survey also found that many U.S. hoteliers were behind their initial forecasts. But after the tournament, U.S. host markets recorded significant room-revenue and RevPAR gains.
The available evidence does not provide comparable final occupancy, average daily rate (ADR), RevPAR and room-revenue figures for all three countries. Mexico’s traveler and tourism-spending totals use different measures, and the cited pre-event snapshot covers only selected dates. Without like-for-like final hotel data, it is not possible to say that Canada or Mexico definitively outperformed the United States over the full tournament.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
