Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
After a customer asked Dbrand for help with a discolored MacBook skin, the company’s main X account mocked his surname in a post critics condemned as racist. Dbrand later called the incident a “huge fumble,” apologized privately and offered him $10,000, which it described as a goodwill gesture with no strings attached. The offer did not settle the central question for critics: whether money addressed the public insult and the harm it caused.
What happened between Dbrand and Bhuwan Chitransh?
In an exchange reported on or around April 8–9, 2024, Bhuwan Chitransh asked Dbrand about discoloration on a MacBook skin. Dbrand’s support account responded with cleaning advice: use a microfiber cloth lightly dampened with isopropyl alcohol, and email the company if the problem continued. Its main account then quote-posted the customer and mocked his surname.
Contemporaneous reporting reproduced the deleted post as: “Your last name is basically shit rash, be serious.” The post was later deleted; the wording is therefore reported from screenshots and coverage, not a currently available post. The support reply and the main account’s joke were separate actions: one addressed the product, while the other turned the customer into a public punchline.
Why did critics call the post racist?
Chitransh was identified in coverage as Indian. Critics saw the hygiene-related pun on his surname as invoking a racist stereotype about Indians and cleanliness. That interpretation does not establish what Dbrand intended internally, but it explains why many people considered the remark more than merely rude or irreverent.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minute#1 Best Overall
- 𝐑𝐈𝐃𝐆𝐄 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐏𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞: The Ridge Everyday Phone Case delivers premium protection through thoughtful engineering - dual-layer construction, aluminum controls, and comprehensive drop protection. From the soft-touch TPU bumper to the dedicated camera button, every detail serves a purpose.
- 𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐋𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞: RIDGE phone cases are compatible with MagSafe and Qi wireless charging, so you can enjoy the convenience of charging your phone without removing the cas
- 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 & 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧: RIDGE phone cases come with premium aluminum physical buttons that provide precise and responsive feedback. Full access to camera controls, buttons, and ports allows for easy tap, touch, and swipe functionality.
- 𝐄𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: RIDGE phone cases are crafted from the most trusted materials. From premium, oil-waxed leather to incredibly durable and lightweight aramid fiber, while soft microfiber lining and drop/impact protection safeguard your phone from everyday wear and tear.
- 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐃𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: We build products that last a lifetime, guaranteed. Rest easy, knowing you are protected by our lifetime warranty. Try it for 99-days, and if you don’t like it for any reason at all send it back, no questions asked.
The setting mattered too. Chitransh had approached the company for product help, and Dbrand’s prominent corporate account amplified the insult to a much larger audience. Contemporary coverage also reported racist abuse directed at him amid the backlash. Deleting the original post could limit its continued reach, but it could not erase screenshots or undo the attention already generated.
How did Dbrand respond?
The backlash did not begin with an immediate, restrained apology. Dbrand continued its sarcastic tone in early replies, including rejecting a request to use that same tone in an apology. In its later public response, reported on April 10, the company acknowledged that it had mocked Chitransh’s name and called the incident a “huge fumble.” It also said it had apologized to him privately.
Dbrand defended its broader style by saying it had been “poking fun at customers on social media for over a decade” and would continue doing so. That history helps explain the company’s deliberately provocative voice, but it does not make every target or joke equivalent. Humor aimed at a product or a willing participant differs from ridicule aimed at a customer seeking support, especially when the punchline touches identity and the company controls the larger platform.
Rank #2
- MAGNETIC CASE: Built-in industrial-grade magnets give our case a stronger hold on magnetic surfaces
- MILITARY-GRADE PROTECTION: Designed to exceed military drop-test standards
- TWIST LOCK: Built-in RokLock Twist lock system is compatible with our bike mounts, motorcycle mounts, car mounts and more
- WIRELESS CHARGING COMPATIBILITY: Compatibility with wireless charging products other than our own may vary
- STURDY: 6-sided, 360-degree protection – while still fitting into your pocket
Was the $10,000 offer hush money?
Dbrand said it offered Chitransh $10,000 as a “gesture of goodwill” and said the offer had no strings attached. Critics characterized the payment as hush money or a transactional response; Dbrand rejected that description. The available reporting establishes an offer and the company’s stated terms, not a legal settlement, a court-assessed amount of damages, or a condition that Chitransh remain silent.
Gizmodo reported that Chitransh said he was keeping the money. That establishes his stated intention, but the reporting cited here does not independently confirm that the funds were transferred or establish whether a written agreement existed. Keeping an offered payment, if accepted, would not by itself mean that he endorsed the insult.
What role did MKBHD play?
Technology creator Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, said publicly that he would not work with Dbrand until the original tweet was deleted. Coverage subsequently reported the tweet’s deletion. The sequence increased pressure on the company, but available reporting does not establish that Brownlee caused the deletion or that the two events were part of an agreement.
Rank #3
- Designed for iPhone 17/18 Pro: This clear magsafe case is only designed for iPhone 17/18 Pro 6.3 inch and does not support any other models
- Strong Magnetic Attraction: Designed for iPhone 17/18 Pro with 38 N52 magnets for 2400g lock. Fully compatible with MagSafe chargers, magnetic car mounts & Qi wireless charging without signal drop
- Tempered Glass Screen Protector: All-in-one set features a 9H tempered glass screen protector for iPhone 17/18 Pro. High-definition screen cover guards display against scratches while keeping touch response fast
- Crystal Clear: Premium clear iPhone 17/18 Pro case made with Bayer TPU & PC. Nano antioxidant layer resists yellowing, oil, and smudges, keeping your iPhone looking brand-new with lasting clarity
- 10FT Military Grade Protection：10FT military drop protection for iPhone 18/17 Pro case. Hard PC backplate, flexible shockproof TPU bumpers, and 4 corner airbags absorb heavy impacts from accidental falls
Did the apology address the harm?
Dbrand’s response had meaningful elements: it acknowledged the specific act of mocking Chitransh’s name, described it as a mistake, said it had apologized privately and offered money without stated conditions. Those steps matter, but they do not answer every accountability question. The company’s continued defense of customer-directed teasing sat uneasily beside its admission that this particular joke crossed a line.
A fuller response would be judged not only by the apology or payment, but also by whether the customer’s original problem was resolved, whether the company removed and stopped amplifying the harmful post, and whether it recognized the risk created when a large account directs attention at an individual. The cited coverage confirms the cleaning advice and an invitation to email Dbrand if the discoloration persisted; it does not establish whether the skin was replaced, refunded or otherwise fixed.
What remains unconfirmed?
- Whether the $10,000 was ultimately transferred, or whether a written agreement existed.
- Whether Chitransh’s MacBook skin issue was resolved.
- Whether Dbrand changed its internal social-media practices or reviewed the abuse directed at him.
The April 2024 incident shows the limits of treating an edgy brand voice as a blanket defense: a joke can be offensive and reasonably condemned as racist without proving discriminatory intent. Dbrand acknowledged fault and made a substantial offer, but those steps did not, on their own, establish that the product complaint was resolved or that the wider harm was repaired.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
