The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →David Goggins and two associated companies sued Amazon in February 2024, alleging that counterfeit copies of his books were offered through Amazon’s marketplace. The books named in the court record are Can’t Hurt Me and Never Finished. On September 30, 2025, a federal judge ordered the dispute into arbitration and stayed the court case. That order did not decide whether any books were counterfeit or whether Amazon infringed anyone’s rights.
What did Goggins allege in the lawsuit?
In the operative complaint as summarized by the court, Goggins and the other plaintiffs alleged that Amazon “commingles” legitimate products with inferior counterfeits. They described books with askew images and substandard paper, and said customers could have difficulty distinguishing authentic products from third-party knockoffs. The plaintiffs also alleged reputational harm and violations of Amazon’s public commitments to prohibit counterfeit sales. These are allegations, not findings by the court. The court’s September 30, 2025 order summarizes the claims.
A February 26, 2024 GeekWire report said the complaint described hundreds of messages from Goggins and representatives asking Amazon to stop third-party sellers from offering alleged counterfeit copies. It also reported that Goggins had raised the issue publicly in October 2023 and that the complaint described an incident involving 125 books alleged to be bootlegs. Those details likewise remain reported allegations, not findings that the books were counterfeit.
What happened in court?
- February 23, 2024: Goggins and associated companies filed suit against Amazon entities in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The claims included copyright and trademark infringement, false advertising and false designation of origin, Washington personality-rights and consumer-protection claims, and common-law claims. The court record identifies the claims and procedural history.
- September 30, 2025: Judge Jamal N. Whitehead granted Amazon’s motion to compel arbitration and stayed the case. The court concluded that the parties were bound by arbitration agreements and that those agreements assigned questions about the scope of the dispute to the arbitrator.
The agreements at issue related to Goggins’s use of Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing for digital books and Amazon Advantage for hardcopies. The ruling was procedural: it sent the dispute to arbitration rather than resolving whether the alleged counterfeiting or infringement occurred. Amazon’s motion to dismiss was administratively terminated after arbitration was compelled.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11#1 Best Overall
- Easy to maintain
- This product comes in a proper packaging
- It is made up of premium quality material.
Were the books actually counterfeit?
The cited court order did not determine that any copies were counterfeit, and it did not decide the plaintiffs’ infringement claims. It records the allegations and addresses where the dispute must be decided. The case should therefore be described as a lawsuit over alleged bootleg books, not as a court-confirmed counterfeit operation.
Is the arbitration finished?
The accessible Justia docket summary says its docket report was last retrieved on September 30, 2025 and notes that a newer listing may be available through PACER. That record establishes the September 2025 order, but it does not establish the arbitration’s outcome or any later court proceedings. The status after that date is therefore not confirmed here.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How can a reader assess a copy?
The allegations point to possible warning signs, not a reliable authentication test. The complaint described askew images and substandard paper, but print variation or a suspicious-looking copy alone does not establish that a particular book is counterfeit. The sources available do not provide a definitive authentication checklist or verify any current Amazon seller as authorized.
Quick Recap
- Check the edition and the seller’s provenance; a marketplace listing by itself does not establish authorization.
- Inspect print quality and image alignment as possible concerns, not conclusive proof.
- Do not treat the lawsuit or a purchase link as verification that a specific listing is authentic.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
