The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →In January 2011, GamesBeat’s Dean Takahashi reported that Bing Gordon had been named the recipient of the Academy of Interactive Arts and Sciences lifetime achievement award, to be presented at the DICE Summit, which the article gave as February 9 to 11, 2011. The headline’s claim that “the future is Bing Gordon’s game” referred to his view at the time that games would reach far larger audiences through social features and web platforms. Those views were his opinions as of January 2011, and this article treats them that way.
What the award was and why it was announced
The Academy of Interactive Arts and Sciences gives its lifetime achievement award to individuals who have shaped the games industry over a long career. In the GamesBeat interview, Gordon was presented as the new honoree, with the ceremony scheduled for the DICE Summit in early February 2011. The announcement was the news hook; the interview was the longer piece about where Gordon thought the industry was heading.
A career that moved from packaged games to venture capital
Takahashi describes Gordon’s career at Electronic Arts as lasting more than 25 years, beginning in 1982. It included a long stint as chief creative officer. Gordon then moved to Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the venture firm, where the article presents social and mobile games as a new area of growth. The interview discusses investments and involvement in companies such as Zynga and ngmoco as they were viewed in early 2011.
That sequence matters for a finance reader. A senior executive at a large publisher became an investor in young companies whose business models were still unproven. The interview shows the investor’s view of that shift, not an independent assessment of how those bets turned out.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
The social-game thesis in Gordon’s words
Gordon’s core argument was about scale. He said social games could reach much larger audiences than traditional games because they combine goals, rewards, and friendship, and because they can be distributed easily through web platforms. Asked about the next 25 years, he offered the line the headline drew on:
“Games are becoming like a social lingua franca.”
Rank #2
He also described how his sense of market size had changed, contrasting the audience expectations of early video games with the much larger audiences he saw on the web. In his account, social games could make playing a game a familiar social habit rather than a specialized hobby.
The trade-offs he acknowledged
Gordon did not argue that social games would simply beat packaged games on every measure. The interview frames the comparison around several axes:
- Audience reach, where he argued social and web games had the advantage.
- Time and intensity of participation, where the article notes a trade-off against reach.
- Production quality and platform constraints.
- Social interaction and rewards.
- Speed of development feedback, meaning how quickly a team learns from players.
For readers weighing these claims, the important distinction is between broad reach and deep engagement. A product can be used by many people for short periods, or by fewer people for long periods, and those two patterns produce very different revenue. Gordon raised the trade-off himself, which is one reason the interview is more useful than a pure promotional piece.
The business-model warning
On changes in how games make money, Gordon said: “In any business that grows big on one business model, transitions can throw everything in the air.” This is the most transferable line in the interview. A company that has built a large, profitable business on one model, such as selling boxed copies, faces hard choices when a new model takes over. The same logic applies to any investor evaluating a firm that depends on a single revenue source.
On Electronic Arts specifically, he said: “The future is in EA’s hands. It’s pretty hard to predict.” That answer is a reminder that even a leading executive was not offering a confident forecast about a company’s direction.
Venture focus: social activity, commerce, and virtual goods
The interview also covers Kleiner Perkins’ sFund and Gordon’s interest in where social activity, commerce, and entertainment overlap. Virtual goods and e-commerce were part of that picture. The idea was that as games became more social and more connected to the web, the places where people spent money on play would change.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
- Targets the development of essential social skills such as empathy, friendship, manners, and emotional understanding.
- Versatile gameplay options, including action games and sentence-building games, ensure a rich, engaging experience.
- Designed for children aged 5-8, aligning with educational standards for grades 1-2.
- The set includes 4 board games, 6 counters, a spinner, a die, and an answer sheet, providing all you need for endless fun and learning.
- Ideal for both classroom and family settings, offering a fun way to build interpersonal skills through play.
Those are the interview’s ideas, stated at a particular moment. They do not describe what those markets look like today.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Which figures to treat as claims
The article contains specific numbers, including a claim about CityVille reaching 100 million monthly active users and historical audience comparisons Gordon offers for Star Wars entertainment formats. These figures are reported in the January 14, 2011 GamesBeat article as statements made at that time. They should be quoted with that attribution and date. They are not independently verified measurements, and they should not be used as current audience data for CityVille, Facebook, Zynga, Electronic Arts, or the wider internet.
How to read a forecast like this
A forecast from an investor or executive can be useful, but it works best when you check a few things first:
- Date of the statement. Note when it was made and what the market looked like then. Gordon’s 2011 predictions were made before the social games market had matured.
- Who holds a stake. The speaker was involved in companies he discussed. That does not make him wrong, but it means the optimism deserves a second look.
- Reach versus depth. Ask whether a large audience translates into spending, or only into attention.
- Dependence on one model. Check how much of a company’s revenue rests on a single way of making money.
- Whether the speaker committed to a number. Gordon’s most quotable lines were directional. Specific claims, such as the user count above, are the ones to verify.
Used this way, the interview is less a prediction to be graded and more a record of how a well-placed industry figure framed a shift in business models. For personal finance, the lesson is the habit of asking what a forecast depends on, not a view on any particular company.
Source for all interview content: Dean Takahashi, “With latest accolade, the future is Bing Gordon’s game (exclusive interview),” GamesBeat, January 14, 2011.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
