Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
ArvinMeritor announced a plan in May 2008 to spin off its Light Vehicle Systems (LVS) business to shareholders as a new company called Arvin Innovation, Inc. The transaction did not proceed as announced. By January 2009, ArvinMeritor was pursuing a sale of LVS, and its fiscal 2009 annual report described sales of many of the business’s operations.
What ArvinMeritor proposed in May 2008
On May 6, 2008, ArvinMeritor said its board had approved a plan to separate LVS from its Commercial Vehicle Systems (CVS) business. CVS would stay with ArvinMeritor; the proposed standalone company, Arvin Innovation, Inc., would receive the light-vehicle business.
Under the announced structure, ArvinMeritor shareholders would receive all of Arvin Innovation’s common stock through a pro rata, tax-free dividend. The company said shareholder approval was not required and expected to complete the separation within 12 months. Completion was conditional on satisfactory financial and automotive-market conditions and other customary approvals, so the announcement described an intended transaction—not a completed one. ArvinMeritor’s May 2008 announcement set out those terms.
The release proposed LVS president Phil Martens as Arvin Innovation’s president and CEO, and James Marley as its non-executive chairman. Those were planned appointments for the proposed company.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems#1 Best Overall
Why management said it wanted to separate the businesses
ArvinMeritor presented the spin-off as part of its “3R” transformation strategy—rationalize, refocus, and regenerate—and as the result of a strategic review. Chairman, CEO, and president Chip McClure said the separation plan was intended to enhance long-term shareholder value. He also argued that separate companies could focus more closely on their core businesses and growth opportunities and gain greater recognition in their respective global markets. McClure’s comments state management’s rationale; they are not evidence that the proposed benefits were achieved.
Martens said an independent Arvin Innovation could pursue specific growth initiatives, improve customer focus, expand its global presence, and develop next-generation systems technology. Those, too, were expectations for the business ArvinMeritor intended to create.
Rank #2
How large was the proposed LVS business?
ArvinMeritor reported that LVS had $2.2 billion in sales in 2007: $2.0 billion in value-added sales and $200 million in pass-through sales. It said more than 60 percent of LVS value-added sales came from outside North America. These are company-reported historical figures in the 2008 announcement, not current revenue or geographic-mix figures.
What happened to Arvin Innovation?
Arvin Innovation remained a proposed company name; the planned spin-off did not go ahead as announced. On January 8, 2009, ArvinMeritor said it had been negotiating to sell LVS in its entirety. It said unprecedented credit-market challenges and weak industry volumes meant it could not obtain appropriate value for the whole business in that financial environment. The January 2009 update marked a change from the original spin-off plan.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →ArvinMeritor’s fiscal 2009 Form 10-K explained that, as financial markets weakened and other factors emerged, it considered alternatives that included selling all or parts of LVS. The company reported progress in selling many LVS businesses. It said Body Systems and a relatively minor portion of Chassis remained among its light-vehicle businesses, while describing intense competition, oversupply, difficult end markets, and financially troubled customers. Its broader decision was to concentrate resources on commercial-vehicle and industrial businesses. The fiscal 2009 annual report describes this later course; it does not establish the present-day ownership of every legacy product line.
Spin-off plan versus the later LVS disposition
| Issue | May 2008 proposal | 2009 course described by the company |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction form | Distribute Arvin Innovation shares pro rata to ArvinMeritor shareholders as a tax-free dividend. | After exploring alternatives, ArvinMeritor pursued a sale of LVS as a whole and reported selling many LVS businesses. |
| Market context | Completion depended on satisfactory financial and automotive-market conditions. | The company cited credit-market challenges, weak volumes, financial-market deterioration, intense competition, oversupply, and troubled customers. |
| What stayed with ArvinMeritor | CVS was to remain with ArvinMeritor. | The annual report described a focus on commercial-vehicle and industrial businesses; Body Systems and a relatively minor portion of Chassis remained among the light-vehicle businesses at that point. |
How Cummins fits into the later history
Cummins reported completing its acquisition of Meritor on August 3, 2022, for $2.9 billion, including debt retired at closing. Cummins said the acquisition would support investment in electrification and add products to its Components business. Cummins’ 2022 Form 10-K and its completion announcement document that later deal. It was an acquisition of Meritor, not completion of ArvinMeritor’s 2008 plan to distribute Arvin Innovation to shareholders.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.




