Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Former HD Supply warehouse employee Quinton J. Hall alleges that a 2024 forklift-battery incident, the company’s response to his medical restrictions, and racial discrimination led to his federal lawsuit. Hall reportedly seeks at least $50 million in damages, but that figure is a demand—not an award—and the allegations have not been established as facts in court.
What is Hall v. HD Supply about?
Hall v. HD Supply, Inc. is identified in case-index records as No. 1:25-cv-06567 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Those indexes identify the case as filed on Nov. 14, 2025, and list Judge Sarah E. Geraghty; they are not the underlying docket or pleadings. Law360’s case page and a separate case-index record list the case number and court.
A Dec. 14, 2025 TechBullion report describes Hall’s claims. According to that report, Hall alleges that a forklift battery at HD Supply’s GA02 Forest Park distribution center smoked, overheated and erupted on June 27, 2024. He reportedly says he became disoriented, was exposed to fumes and sustained a serious back injury. The complaint itself was not available in the cited coverage, so these details should be understood as allegations reported by TechBullion, not court findings.
Alleged accommodation and discrimination
TechBullion also reports Hall’s allegations that HD Supply denied him light-duty work despite medical restrictions, assigned him physically demanding put-away duties, and treated him differently from non-Black injured coworkers. The reported claims concern workplace injury, accommodation and race discrimination; the available information does not establish whether a court has accepted any of them.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
Reported damages demand
Hall reportedly seeks at least $50 million in damages, according to the same Dec. 14, 2025 article. That is the amount sought by the plaintiff as reported in coverage; it is not a judgment, settlement, or indication of what he will recover.
What is the case status?
A third-party report dated June 30, 2026 says the court allowed Hall to file a Second Amended Complaint following a June 16 order and that discovery was underway. The report characterizes the new pleading as adding a witness-retaliation theory. This is a secondary procedural account, not an official court record, and it does not prove the underlying claims.
A docket-indexing page says it checked activity through Sept. 16, 2026, but could not determine whether the case was active or terminated and had no filings archived. The precise status as of Oct. 8, 2026, and the operative claims therefore cannot be confirmed from these records. Readers seeking the latest status should consult the case docket index and verify against the official court docket.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Does an OSHA inspection prove the alleged incident?
No. A separate secondary article describes an OSHA inspection at 2100 Anvil Block Road in Forest Park, opened May 6, 2024, with an emphasis area of “Forklift” and a powered-industrial-truck citation summary. The account says the record does not explicitly describe Hall’s alleged June 27 incident. The official OSHA record and citation disposition were not independently verified here, so the inspection should not be treated as proof of the incident or of Hall’s lawsuit allegations.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Quick Recap
What readers should keep distinct
- Allegations versus findings: The reported workplace incident, injury, accommodation dispute, discrimination and retaliation claims are attributed to Hall; they are not established findings in the information available here.
- Demand versus outcome: At least $50 million is the damages demand reported in coverage, not money awarded or paid.
- Procedural report versus court record: The June 2026 update is a third-party summary; the latest official case status and precise claims require docket verification.
- OSHA record versus lawsuit evidence: A separate inspection summary does not by itself substantiate Hall’s account of the June 27 incident.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
