October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan NowOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Did the Collard Family Receive Compensation for Stolen Generations Removals?

The Collard family’s claim against Western Australia was dismissed in 2013. The later costs appeal was a separate dispute, and its outcome is not established by the available reporting.
From TheFinanceBase Team2 min to read

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

No. The Collard family’s compensation claim against the State of Western Australia was dismissed by the Supreme Court of Western Australia in December 2013. A later costs dispute was separate: in 2015, the Court of Appeal ordered the family to pay costs, and the family said it planned to appeal that costs ruling. The eventual outcome of the proposed appeal is not established by the available reporting.

What the Collard family claimed

On 26 May 2010, Donald and Sylvia Collard and seven of their children lodged a writ in the Supreme Court of Western Australia seeking redress from the state. Contemporary reporting said the children had been removed from their parents without consent and placed in state care between March 1958 and December 1961. The Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia (ALSWA) described the case as a test case.

The claim concerned the effects of family separation and the state’s care of the children. Reports described allegations of abuse and harm made by the family; those were allegations in the claim, not findings that the court made. PerthNow’s 2010 report and ALSWA’s statement on the decision provide contemporaneous accounts of the case.

Why the compensation claim was dismissed

On 20 December 2013, Justice Janine Pritchard dismissed the claim. ABC News reported that the court concluded the state was not subject to the fiduciary duties the plaintiffs alleged. It also reported that the plaintiffs had no right of action because they had not complied with requirements under the Crown Suits Act.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

That legal result should not be confused with a finding that the family’s experiences did not occur. In reporting the judgment, ABC quoted Justice Pritchard acknowledging the emotional pain and heartache the family experienced, while explaining that the applicable legal principles and evidence did not establish the alleged fiduciary duties. ABC News’ report on the dismissal describes the court’s reasoning.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What happened in the later costs dispute

The claim’s dismissal and the later costs ruling were different decisions. According to ABC News, the trial judge initially made no order for costs, citing the case’s test-case character. In May 2015, the Court of Appeal ruled that the family had to pay costs. ABC reported in June 2015 that the family planned to appeal the costs decision to the High Court. The reporting available here does not establish how that proposed appeal was resolved.

Rank #2
Sale
The Fatal Shore: The Epic of Australia's Founding
  • Robert Hughes, The Fatal Shore: The Epic of Australia's Founding, paperback

The costs ruling did not award compensation to the family; it concerned who would bear the costs of the litigation after the claim had been dismissed. ABC’s May 2015 costs report and June 2015 report on the planned appeal cover those later developments.

What the case does—and does not—establish

  • The case involved nine named family members and the State of Western Australia; it was not a national compensation program.
  • Although ALSWA and contemporary coverage described it as a test case, that description does not mean the court created a general right to compensation for Stolen Generations survivors.
  • The judgment addressed the legal claims and procedural requirements before the court. The reported outcome does not decide eligibility for any separate redress program.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.