DriversRecommendedOutdated drivers can make a good PC feel brokenScan driver issues before chasing fixes manually.Scan NowOctober DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsClean PCRecommendedOne scan can reveal what keeps slowing WindowsLook for cleanup and repair opportunities.Run Scan×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Trump’s FTC Firings: What the Supreme Court’s 2026 Ruling Changed

The Supreme Court ruled that the FTC’s statutory removal protection is unconstitutional, leaving Rebecca Slaughter’s removal in effect. Alvaro Bedoya had resigned during the case.
From TheFinanceBase Team2 min to read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

President Donald Trump removed Democratic FTC commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya in March 2025, despite a federal law that then allowed commissioners to be removed only for specified causes. On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the FTC’s for-cause protection violates the Constitution and overruled the 1935 precedent that had upheld it. The decision left Slaughter’s removal in effect; Bedoya’s claim was dismissed after he resigned.

What happened to the two FTC Democrats Trump fired?

In March 2025, Trump removed commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya. The notices, as described by the Supreme Court, said their continued service was inconsistent with administration priorities and invoked the president’s Article II authority. The opinion says the notices did not cite “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” the causes named in the FTC Act.

Slaughter challenged her removal. Bedoya later resigned, and his claims were dismissed as moot, so the Supreme Court decided Slaughter’s case. The Court’s June 29, 2026 opinion is available here.

What did the FTC Act and the earlier Supreme Court precedent provide?

The FTC Act provides for five commissioners serving seven-year terms. It says a commissioner may be removed only “for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court upheld that FTC-specific restriction on presidential removal.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

That precedent controlled when the district court considered Slaughter’s case in July 2025. It granted her summary judgment and ordered relief restoring her to office. The court’s July 17 order is available here.

How did the case reach the Supreme Court?

  1. July 2025: The district court applied Humphrey’s Executor and ordered relief for Slaughter.
  2. September 2025: The Supreme Court stayed the district court’s order, treated the government’s application as a petition for review before judgment, and agreed to hear the case. It directed briefing on the FTC removal restriction, whether to overrule Humphrey’s Executor, and whether courts may prevent removal from public office. The Supreme Court docket records the proceedings.
  3. December 8, 2025: The Court heard oral argument.
  4. June 29, 2026: The Court issued its decision.

The D.C. Circuit’s September 2, 2025 order is available here.

What did the Supreme Court decide?

In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protection is unconstitutional and overruled Humphrey’s Executor. The majority comprised Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

The Court framed its decision around Article II, which vests executive power in the president and assigns the president responsibility for executing the laws. Its syllabus states: “The FTC’s for-cause removal provision is contrary to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.” The syllabus is prepared for convenience; the opinion itself is the Court’s controlling explanation.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Can the president fire FTC commissioners now?

Under Trump v. Slaughter, the FTC Act’s for-cause limit cannot prevent the president from removing a commissioner. The ruling resolved the dispute over the FTC provision and left Slaughter’s removal in effect. It is not a ruling on every independent regulator: the implications for other agencies depend on their governing statutes and any later proceedings.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.