Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The records available for these cases do not support a reliable list of five distinct lawsuits WWE lost. The clearest documented court loss is a 2001 English High Court ruling over WWE’s agreement with the World Wide Fund for Nature. Other notable disputes ended in settlements, which are agreements—not verdicts or automatic admissions of wrongdoing.
What counts as a lawsuit WWE lost?
A court loss means a judge or jury ruled against WWE on a claim. A settlement means the parties agreed to resolve a dispute; it does not, by itself, establish that either side’s allegations were true. Dismissals and rulings for WWE are different outcomes again. The cases below keep those categories separate rather than treating every resolved lawsuit as a defeat.
The clearest documented court loss
World Wide Fund for Nature v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment
In England in 2001, the High Court granted summary judgment to the World Wide Fund for Nature over WWE’s use of WWF web addresses and its scratch logo, finding a breach of the parties’ 1994 agreement. WWE’s SEC filing describes the resulting compliance steps: it changed its corporate name to World Wrestling Entertainment, adopted WWE initials, and revised its logo. The filing characterizes the ruling as a breach of agreement; it should not be recast as a finding of trademark infringement. WWE’s SEC filing
Notable WWE lawsuits that ended in settlements
These cases were resolved by agreement, not by a judgment that WWE was liable. Where amounts are reported, they are attributed to the company or filing that disclosed them.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
- Fan Favorites! WWE action figures bring Superstars to life in 6-inch scale.
- TrueFX Technology! Each figure is detailed with a life-like face for added collectability.
- Dynamic Posing! Fans can recreate signature moves with 14 points of articulation.
- Play and Display! Reenact favorite WWE Main Event matches or create new rivalries and moves.
- Super Collectible! WWE fans can find their favorite Superstar figures (each sold separately, subject to availability).
Owen Hart family wrongful-death case
Owen Hart’s family brought a wrongful-death case against WWE after his 1999 death during a wrestling event. WWE announced a settlement with the family in 2000. In a 2003 announcement, WWE reported the amount as $18 million; that figure is the company’s account of the settlement, not a court-awarded damages amount. WWE’s 2003 announcement
WWE v. Parents Television Council and others
WWE sued the Parents Television Council and others over statements linking children’s deaths to SmackDown and claims about advertisers. In 2002, WWE announced a settlement under which it would receive $3.5 million plus non-monetary terms, including an apology. The reported amount and terms come from WWE’s announcement, not a damages judgment. WWE’s settlement announcement
MLW Media v. WWE
MLW Media brought antitrust claims against WWE. The allegations were not court findings: WWE’s SEC disclosure says the case settled for $20 million and was dismissed with prejudice on December 26, 2023. The amount was reported in a WWE/TKO SEC filing in 2024. SEC filing
Rank #2
- Roll down to the ring with the Lucha Low Rider vehicle.
- Includes a WWE Main Event Rey Mysterio action figure with advanced articulation.
- Recreate iconic entrances with the Lucha Low Rider hydraulics action.
- Rey Mysterio can enter the match with the vehicle's launching action.
- Ride into matches with real rolling wheels.
WWE securities litigation
City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System v. WWE is a securities case with a settlement administrator’s page listing a final order and judgment. That landing page alone does not establish the settlement amount, approval date, class definition, or findings, so those details should not be inferred from it. Settlement administrator documents page
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Shareholder derivative and books-and-records litigation
A 2021 SEC-filed stipulation records a settlement and release in shareholder derivative and books-and-records litigation. Its terms state that the settlement is not an admission of liability or of the claims’ validity or truth; it is therefore not evidence of a court finding that WWE lost. SEC-filed stipulation
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Other legal cases that should not be counted as WWE losses
Former wrestlers’ concussion claims
WWE’s 2019 annual report says multiple former wrestlers’ concussion claims were dismissed and that the remaining Singleton/LoGrasso claim ended in summary judgment for WWE. Those outcomes are not examples of WWE losing. WWE’s 2019 annual report
Rank #3
- Fan Favorites! WWE action figures bring Superstars to life in 6-inch scale.
- TrueFX Technology! Each figure is detailed with a life-like face for added collectability.
- Dynamic Posing! Fans can recreate signature moves with 14 points of articulation.
- Play and Display! Reenact favorite WWE Main Event matches or create new rivalries and moves.
- Super Collectible! WWE fans can find their favorite Superstar figures (each sold separately, subject to availability).
The Lewmar settlement ruling in the Owen Hart litigation
WWE’s 2003 account says a Missouri judge invalidated a no-money settlement between Martha Hart and equipment manufacturer Lewmar. That ruling concerned the separate Lewmar settlement; it was not a judgment against WWE in the family’s wrongful-death case. WWE’s 2003 announcement
SEC matter involving Vince McMahon
The SEC’s 2025 filing describes settled charges against Vince McMahon related to nondisclosure of settlement agreements and states that no charges were brought against WWE in that matter. It is a regulatory matter involving McMahon, not a lawsuit that WWE lost. SEC announcement
A reported merger-litigation agreement in principle
A 2026 SEC filing reports an agreement in principle in WWE merger litigation, including WWE’s expected portion and an anticipated insurance recovery. An agreement in principle is not a trial loss or necessarily a final settlement. The filing’s status should be checked for final approval and disposition before relying on the reported terms. SEC filing
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
