What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Yes, X could still face GDPR enforcement over using EU/EEA users’ public posts to train Grok, but the official sources reviewed do not establish that the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) has issued a final sanction in that inquiry. The urgent Irish court proceedings ended in September 2024 after X agreed to keep suspending the covered processing. That procedural resolution did not decide whether the earlier data use was lawful. In April 2025, the DPC opened a separate formal inquiry into that question.
What happened, and what is the status now?
The dispute has three distinct stages: an urgent court action in 2024, a formal GDPR inquiry into training data in 2025, and a separate inquiry into potentially harmful images in 2026. The latter two should not be treated as outcomes of the 2024 case.
| Date | Development | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| May 7–August 1, 2024 | The DPC says X processed personal data in public posts by EU/EEA users for Grok training during this period. | This is the period identified in the DPC’s account of the processing covered by the urgent action. |
| August 8, 2024 | The DPC announced that X had agreed to suspend the relevant processing while urgent High Court proceedings were under way. | The undertaking addressed the immediate processing concern; it was not a final decision on GDPR compliance. |
| September 4, 2024 | The High Court proceedings were struck out after X agreed to adhere to the undertaking permanently. | The urgent court action ended, but the legality of the earlier processing was not determined. |
| April 11, 2025 | The DPC formally commenced an own-volition inquiry into the use of EU/EEA users’ publicly accessible X posts to train Grok and other generative-AI models. | The substantive GDPR question remained open. |
| End of 2025 | The DPC’s annual report said the inquiry’s information-gathering phase was ongoing and that X had responded to multiple rounds of questions. | The report confirms the inquiry had not concluded by year-end 2025. |
| February 17, 2026 | The DPC opened a separate inquiry concerning potentially harmful, non-consensual intimate or sexualised images associated with Grok functionality. | This is a different investigation, not a finding or sanction in the training-data inquiry. |
Sources: DPC announcement on X’s suspension agreement; DPC announcement on conclusion of court proceedings; DPC announcement on the 2025 inquiry; DPC Annual Report 2025; DPC announcement on the separate 2026 inquiry.
Did X win or get cleared when the court action ended?
No. The proceedings ended because X agreed to maintain the relevant suspension permanently. That resolved the urgent interim litigation; it was not a court ruling that the past processing was lawful, nor a finding that it was unlawful. The DPC said it would continue examining broader legal issues.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
- STAR WARS: THE MANDALORIAN & GROGU: The Mandalorian and his young apprentice, Grogu, embark on a thrilling adventure as they travel the galaxy
- 4.5-INCH SCALE STAR WARS ACTION FIGURES: Includes 3 action figures -- the Mandalorian (4.5 inches, 11 cm), Grogu (1.3 inches, 3.3 cm), and Rotta the Hutt (5.5 inches, 14 cm)
- ACTION FIGURE ACCESSORIES: This Star Wars set comes with multiple weapon accessories that fit in the figures' hands
- 2 REUSABLE ACCESSORY RACKS: The included accessory sprues double as reusable storage racks, so kids can keep track of their pieces after playtime
- POSEABLE PLAY: These Star Wars toys feature multiple points of articulation and stand on their own so kids can create awesome action poses
The DPC also sought an opinion from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) under Article 64(2) of the GDPR on issues of general application involving AI-model development and operation. The EDPB later issued a general opinion in December 2024 setting out criteria for supervisory authorities assessing personal-data processing in AI development and deployment. That opinion provides regulatory context; it is not a liability decision against X. DPC statement on the court proceedings and EDPB request; DPC statement referring to the EDPB’s general opinion.
What did X agree to stop—and what did the undertaking not establish?
The DPC’s August 2024 announcement described the covered activity as processing personal data from public posts by EU/EEA users during May 7–August 1, 2024, for the purpose of training Grok. X agreed to suspend that processing, and the later undertaking required it to continue the suspension permanently.
Stopping or deleting source records is not the same thing as deleting model weights, retraining a model, performing machine unlearning, or removing downstream derivatives. TechCrunch reported that the undertaking did not require X to delete models already trained on the data. That report does not establish what X later did with any particular model, or that continued use of a model trained on the data was authorized indefinitely. TechCrunch’s report on the undertaking.
Rank #2
- GROGU: A mysterious alien pursued by bounty hunters on behalf of Imperial interests
- THE MANDALORIAN: Fans and collectors can imagine scenes from the Star Wars Galaxy with this premium Grogu toy, inspired by the Star Wars: The Mandalorian series
- SERIES-BASED CHARACTER-INSPIRED ACCESSORIES: This Star Wars The Black Series action figure comes with 7 entertainment-inspired accessories that make a great addition to any Star Wars collection
- FIND OTHER FIGURES FROM A GALAXY FAR, FAR AWAY: Find movie- and entertainment-inspired Star Wars The Black Series figures to build a Star Wars galaxy (Each sold separately. Subject to availability)
- PREMIUM ARTICULATION AND DETAILING: Star Wars fans and collectors can display this fully articulated figure featuring poseable head, arms, and legs, as well as premium deco, in their collection
Why could enforcement still follow a suspension?
A regulator can investigate completed processing as well as activity that is still happening. Stopping a practice may address ongoing exposure, but it does not automatically erase questions about whether the earlier processing had a valid legal basis or met GDPR requirements. In September 2024, the DPC told TechCrunch it would examine compliance and consider whether corrective powers were warranted if it established an infringement.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →The distinction is between interim protection and a merits decision. The 2024 court application under Section 134 of Ireland’s Data Protection Act 2018 sought urgent authority to suspend, restrict, or prohibit processing. The later inquiry is the route for examining compliance. If an infringement is established, corrective measures can include a fine, an order to bring processing into compliance, or restrictions on processing; the measure and any appeal or cooperation steps depend on the findings and procedure.
Public visibility alone does not settle the GDPR question. The DPC’s 2025 inquiry concerns whether the platform-side processing was lawful and transparent, including the use of publicly accessible posts for generative-AI training. Relevant considerations include a valid legal basis, purpose limitation, fairness, transparency, necessity, and accountability. A public post is not automatically exempt from data-protection law, but its public status alone does not prove that this particular processing was unlawful.
Rank #3
- NECA is welcoming everyone's favorite blue-furred hero to its Ultimate Sesame Street line.
- Standing in 7-inch scale, this action figure captures the lovable charm and comedic confidence of Super Grover in all his heroic glory.
- His arms even have bendy wire to recreate those authentic hero poses! He includes extra interchangeable hands, a flight stand, and the letters “S” and “G.”
What is the 2025 inquiry examining?
The DPC’s April 11, 2025 announcement says its own-volition inquiry concerns personal data in publicly accessible posts on X by EU/EEA users, processed by X Internet Unlimited Company for training Grok and other generative-AI models. The DPC describes Grok as a group of AI models developed by xAI; the inquiry names X Internet Unlimited Company as the relevant platform-side data controller. The companies’ roles should not be collapsed into a claim that they are the same entity.
The inquiry examines compliance with GDPR provisions and principles, including lawfulness and transparency. Its information-gathering phase was still ongoing at the end of 2025 according to the DPC’s annual report. That status does not predict the eventual finding or sanction. DPC inquiry announcement; DPC Annual Report 2025.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Has X been fined, and how large could a GDPR fine be?
The official sources reviewed do not establish that the DPC has issued a final sanction in the training-data inquiry. The latest concrete status in the DPC’s annual report is that information gathering was ongoing at the end of 2025. A pending inquiry is not a violation finding, and no specific fine should be treated as expected.
Rank #4
- ACTION FIGURE Featuring the highly detailed 6.5” MJF pro-wrestling figure.
- PLAY & DISPLAY The figure is articulated and poseable. Recreate your AEW dream match-up!
- DETAILS Features character-authentic details and AEW wrestling gear.
- UNIQUE ACCESSORIES It’s all in the details! The AEW collectible also includes a microphone.
For context, the GDPR allows administrative fines of up to €20 million or, for an undertaking, up to 4% of total worldwide annual turnover for certain infringements, whichever is higher. These are statutory ceilings, not a forecast of X’s penalty. The applicable ceiling and any actual measure depend on the infringement found and the circumstances. GDPR text; DPC guidance on fines and enforcement.
How is the 2026 Grok inquiry different?
The DPC’s February 17, 2026 inquiry concerns the apparent creation and publication on X of potentially harmful, non-consensual intimate or sexualised images involving EU/EEA data subjects, including children, using Grok-related functionality. The DPC identified possible GDPR issues under Articles 5, 6, 25, and 35.
That inquiry concerns generated or published imagery and related processing. It is separate from the 2025 inquiry into using public X posts as training data. Its existence does not show that the training-data inquiry ended in a fine, or establish that the training itself was unlawful. DPC announcement on the 2026 investigation.
Quick Recap
What remains unresolved?
- Whether the DPC has reached a final decision in the training-data inquiry, or issued any fine or corrective order.
- Whether any eventual remedy will address model weights, retraining, unlearning, or only source-data processing.
- Whether the inquiry will involve further cross-border cooperation or an EDPB dispute-resolution process.
- What current Grok training-data practices apply in each European jurisdiction; the 2024 undertaking described here concerns a defined dataset and processing period.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
