Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
A 2021 report on Chinese military procurement found that many purchases in a sample of 2020 records involved AI or autonomous vehicles—technology areas also pursued by the U.S. military. That overlap does not show that the two countries have identical capabilities, priorities, or rules for deploying them. The report also raised a financial and policy tension: American companies, expertise, and capital were described as helping support some Chinese military AI development.
What the 2021 report found
Futurism’s November 13, 2021 article by Noor Al-Sibai summarized Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) work by military researcher Ryan Fedasiuk. The researchers examined more than 66,000 Chinese procurement records dated April through November 2020. As Futurism reported the findings, about one third of the records involved AI or autonomous vehicles. Read the Futurism report.
That figure describes the records in the sample, not a census of Chinese military spending. Procurement records can indicate what was being bought; they do not by themselves establish that a system entered service, how widely it was deployed, or how effectively it would perform. The findings are from 2020 and should not be read as a current assessment of Chinese procurement in 2026.
What “the same” means—and what it does not
The reported overlap is in broad technology categories and military applications. The article names autonomous vehicles, intelligence analysis, decision support, electronic warfare, and cyber operations. Those are areas of military interest, not proof that the United States and China have equivalent systems or use them in the same way.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute#1 Best Overall
Futurism’s summary also says lethal autonomous weapons and automated nuclear-launch technologies were among the least-purchased categories in the reviewed records. Fedasiuk put the finding this way: “China doesn’t appear focused on lethal autonomous weapons or automated nuclear launch, as some have suggested.” That observation is about the procurement records studied; it does not establish that either capability was absent from all Chinese military activity.
Why the U.S. connection matters
The story’s policy concern is not simply that China was buying AI-related technology. Futurism reported that American companies contributed technology, know-how, and money to some Chinese military AI research, and that ready-made products—including autonomous drones and AI-equipped surveillance programs—were also part of the picture. The summary does not provide a company-by-company transaction audit, so it does not support claims that every relevant U.S. company participated or that a particular amount of technology or investment changed hands.
Rank #2
Fedasiuk’s argument, as quoted from a POLITICO op-ed in the Futurism article, was that supply-chain policy alone may not address the issue: “Even as the United States attempts to decouple supply chains from China when it comes to American goods, it also needs to consider new strategies to prevent American know-how from inadvertently powering China’s technological advancements.” In other words, the concern reaches beyond finished products to expertise and capital that may help build capabilities.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to read the headline
The headline’s “exact same crap” phrase is a provocative shorthand for overlap, not a demonstrated equivalence. The material summarized by Futurism does not compare the countries’ spending totals, procurement scale, doctrine, operational deployment, or accountability systems. It supports a narrower conclusion: the 2020 records included purchases in technology areas familiar to U.S. defense, while the report also raised questions about American contributions to some Chinese military AI development.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rank #3
For readers weighing the financial and policy implications, the key distinction is between buying similar kinds of technology and possessing or using the same military capability. The former is what the reported procurement sample suggests; the latter is not established by it.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
