Ralph de la Torre, then chairman and CEO of Steward Health Care System, missed a Senate hearing on September 12, 2024, despite being subpoenaed. The Senate later approved a criminal contempt resolution referring the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia—but a referral is not a criminal charge or a finding of guilt.
Why did Ralph de la Torre miss the Senate hearing?
The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee’s September 12, 2024, hearing examined Steward Health Care’s bankruptcy and how management decisions had affected patient care. De la Torre did not appear after the committee subpoenaed him.
![The Rochester, N.Y. Mafia Senate Hearings: Before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations United States Senate on August 23, 1978 and May 2, 1980 (Includes) Arson-For-Hire, the Testimony of Angelo Monachino Rochester Mafia 'Soldier' Turned Informant [New York]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41M8Xr-iW6L._SL160_.jpg)
His lawyers argued that a bankruptcy court order restricted what he could discuss and that testifying raised Fifth Amendment concerns. Committee members rejected the claim that those constraints justified not appearing, maintaining that he could have attended and answered questions. These were opposing arguments in the congressional dispute, not a court ruling on whether either side was legally correct. The hearing transcript and submitted correspondence are available from the Senate HELP Committee.
At the hearing, committee chair Sen. Bernie Sanders said, “He has decided not to show up because he doesn’t want to explain to the American people how horrific his greed has become.” Ranking member Sen. Bill Cassidy said, “A witness cannot disregard and evade a duly authorized subpoena.” Those remarks convey senators’ views; they are not findings about de la Torre’s conduct.
What did Congress do after he failed to appear?
The committee pursued both civil and criminal contempt resolutions. It adopted them on September 19, 2024, by a 20–0 vote. On September 25, the full Senate approved the criminal contempt resolution by unanimous consent and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.
That sequence was a congressional referral, not proof that prosecutors filed a case. De la Torre’s attorney, Alexander Merton, characterized the hearing as risking “a pseudo-criminal proceeding”; this was counsel’s position, not a judicial determination. The Associated Press reported on the committee’s contempt actions and the full Senate referral.
Who called Steward executives “health care terrorists”?
The phrase came from Louisiana legislator Michael Echols during testimony about Steward executives and alleged failures at Glenwood Regional Medical Center. Echols said, “It is glowingly clear to me that the executives of Steward Health Group are health care terrorists.” It was his characterization of the executives, not a formal legal finding or an established description of them.
How are the Senate referral and later lawsuit different?
They are separate legal tracks. The Senate’s action concerned alleged noncompliance with a subpoena and sent a criminal contempt matter to prosecutors. De la Torre’s later civil lawsuit challenged senators’ subpoena and contempt actions. In September 2025, a federal district court dismissed that suit under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, which protects legislative acts from certain lawsuits.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →On July 31, 2026, the D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal on Speech or Debate Clause grounds. That appeal addressed de la Torre’s civil case against senators; it did not decide whether the Justice Department separately pursued the criminal contempt referral. The district court’s dismissal memorandum and case record and the D.C. Circuit opinion archive concern the civil litigation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Is there a confirmed DOJ prosecution?
The latest located Senate committee item says senators asked the Justice Department for an update on the contempt matter. That request does not establish what DOJ said or whether it filed a prosecution. The available record does not establish the ultimate status of DOJ action after the referral.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
