Recommended Free Tools
ProPublica reported that Jeff Bezos paid no federal individual income tax in 2007 and 2011, and Elon Musk paid none in 2018. That does not mean either man paid no taxes of any kind. The explanation is partly that a rise in the value of stock can increase a person’s wealth without becoming taxable income in that year if the shares are not sold.
What ProPublica reported—and what “no taxes” leaves out
In its 2021 investigation, ProPublica reported zero federal income tax for Bezos in 2007 and 2011 and for Musk in 2018. These are findings about federal individual income tax in specific years, not claims that either person paid nothing in state or local taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, sales taxes, or any other tax. ProPublica’s investigation described its findings as based on tax records it obtained and analyzed.
Why rising wealth does not automatically mean taxable income
A person can become much wealthier on paper when shares they own increase in market value. But that increase is not the same as salary, a dividend, or a gain realized by selling the shares. Under the federal income-tax system discussed in ProPublica’s reporting, appreciation in stock generally does not become taxable capital gain until the asset is sold.
That distinction matters for founders whose fortunes are tied to company shares. If shares rise sharply but are held rather than sold, estimated net worth may climb substantially even though that appreciation does not appear as realized gain on that year’s income-tax return. The timing and type of income, deductions, credits, losses, and asset sales can all affect a particular return; the same explanation should not be assumed to apply identically to Bezos and Musk in every year.
#1 Best Overall
What ProPublica meant by “true tax rate”
ProPublica also compared taxes paid with estimated growth in wealth. Its “true tax rate” is not the statutory federal income-tax rate, nor is it the usual calculation of income tax divided by taxable income. It uses estimated change in wealth as the denominator, drawing in part on Forbes wealth estimates. That answers a different question: how much federal income tax was paid relative to estimated wealth gains, rather than relative to income reported for tax purposes. ProPublica’s methodology explanation describes that calculation.
For example, ProPublica’s 2021 methodology article estimated that the 25 wealthiest people in its analysis collectively gained $401 billion in wealth from 2014 through 2018 while paying $13.6 billion in federal income taxes. Those are ProPublica’s investigative calculations and estimates, not aggregate figures published by the IRS. They should not be read as a standard income-tax rate for every person in the group.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Does this mean the appreciation is never taxed?
No. If appreciated shares are sold, the sale can produce a taxable capital gain, generally measured against the asset’s tax basis. The timing and amount of any tax depend on the transaction and applicable tax rules; the fact that appreciation was unrealized in one year does not establish that it will remain untaxed forever.
Inherited assets illustrate why broad claims about permanently avoiding tax can be misleading. The IRS says the basis of inherited property is generally its fair market value at the decedent’s death, and a later sale above basis can result in taxable gain. Rules and exceptions apply, and this general guidance does not establish that Bezos or Musk used a particular inheritance or estate-planning strategy. See the IRS pages on gifts and inheritances and basis of assets.
Rank #3
What the reporting does—and does not—show
- It does show: ProPublica reported no federal income tax for Bezos in 2007 and 2011 and for Musk in 2018.
- It helps explain: Unrealized stock appreciation can increase wealth without being treated as realized income in the year the shares are held.
- It does not show: That either person paid no taxes of any kind, that every wealthy taxpayer has the same circumstances, or that these reported outcomes prove illegal conduct.
- It does not establish: That borrowing against assets explains either person’s return in a specific year. A loan is not, by itself, taxable income, but the cited reporting does not support attributing a particular year’s result to borrowing.
Tax rules depend on the jurisdiction and tax year. The IRS material above explains general rules, not the details of either individual’s tax returns or advice for a reader’s own circumstances.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
