What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Fiona Harvey sued Netflix in June 2024, seeking at least $170 million over what she alleged was a false and damaging portrayal in Baby Reindeer. That figure was her requested damages—not money awarded by a court. In September 2024, a judge dismissed several claims but allowed defamation and intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claims to proceed at that stage. Netflix appealed, and the trial-court case was stayed; the available records do not verify the appeal’s later outcome.
Why did Fiona Harvey sue Netflix?
Harvey filed a complaint on June 6, 2024, against Netflix, Inc. and Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Her six claims arose from the series’ portrayal of the character Martha, who is based on comedian Richard Gadd’s experiences.
In the complaint, Harvey alleged that the series falsely depicted her as a twice-convicted stalker sentenced to five years in prison and as someone who sexually assaulted Gadd. Those are allegations in her filing, not findings established by the court. The complaint asserted defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, gross negligence, common-law right of publicity, and a statutory right-of-publicity claim under California Civil Code section 3344. Read the complaint.
Was Fiona Harvey awarded $170 million?
No. Harvey’s complaint sought at least $170 million in damages. A request in a lawsuit is not an award, and the figure should not be described as money she won or received. The September 2024 order did not award her that amount.
#1 Best Overall
What did the judge decide?
On September 27, 2024, U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner dismissed Harvey’s negligence and gross-negligence claims, both right-of-publicity claims, and her request for punitive damages. The judge allowed the defamation and intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress claims to proceed beyond the motions then before the court. Read the September 27 order.
The ruling was a decision about which claims could continue at that point in the case. It was not a final judgment that Netflix was liable, nor did it establish the truth of Harvey’s allegations. In explaining the distinction at issue, Judge Klausner wrote: “There is a major difference between stalking and being convicted of stalking in a court of law.”
Rank #2
What happened to Netflix’s appeal?
Netflix appealed the denial of its special motion to strike. After the appeal, the district court stayed proceedings while the appeal was being exhausted and vacated the pretrial and trial dates that were then in place. The district docket mirror records the appeal and stay entries: district-court docket.
The available Ninth Circuit docket mirror was last retrieved October 9, 2024, and shows the appeal’s opening filings and initial briefing schedule, not a later disposition. Ninth Circuit docket mirror. These records do not establish the appeal’s outcome, whether the stay was lifted, or whether the case was later settled, tried, or resolved by judgment. A current court docket is needed to verify any later status.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- MEET LIL’ REINDEER: This soft baby rattle is perfect for newborns and babies. The adorable baby reindeer stuffed animal is designed to engage and entertain your little one with its gentle rattle sound. This is the perfect addition to your Christmas newborn toys collection and reindeer baby shower decorations.
- ENGAGING RATTLE FEATURE: This 5.5-inch stuffed reindeer comes with a gentle ring rattle, providing sensory stimulation and entertainment for your little one, helping them develop motor skills and hand-eye coordination. The machine washable reindeer stuffed animal is made with luxuriously soft red velour plush materials, embroidered safety eyes, and a silky satin bow.
- SAFE AND RELIABLE: Crafted with utmost care, this soft rattle toy is made from high-quality materials, giving parents peace of mind. Compact and lightweight, the Bearington Baby Lil’ Reindeer rattle is designed for easy handling by tiny hands. It's a perfect travel companion, whether in the car, stroller, or crib, keeping your baby comforted and engaged wherever they go.
- PERFECT GIFT: With its endearing design and practical features, this reindeer stuffed animal makes an ideal gift for baby showers, birthdays, or just to celebrate a new addition to the family. This reindeer lovey brings comfort and security to your baby, making it a wonderful choice for Christmas or any occasion that holds sentimental value for years to come.
- AWARD-WINNING TOYS: Bearington, the renowned toy manufacturer, has crafted exceptional stuffed animals and plush toys for 25+ years. From beloved reindeer bears to lifelike dog plushies, our award-winning collections cater to babies, kids, and adults alike. Immerse yourself in our diverse range, featuring realistic stuffed animal dogs, captivating wildlife, and much more. Experience the joy of cuddling with Bearington's extraordinary creations.
Rank #4
- INTERACTIVE STROLLER TOY: This on-the-go activity toy is soft yet full of textures, which is perfect for babies! Rudolph is attached to a c-clip so he can travel in a stroller, car seat, or crib.
- MUSICAL CAR SEAT TOY: Tickle this classic television special character’s belly for a rendition of the Christmas tune “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer,” or squeeze his stuffed hooves and ears for squeak and swish noises
- TEETHER TOY: Baby safe teether attachment sets and accessories are just right for newborns to chew on with different textures to soothe and relieve stress on developing infant gums and teeth.
- DEVELOPMENTAL TOY: With its different textures and features, this plush toy will entertain little boys and girls for months and years while aiding in the development of senses and fine motor skills.
- ASTHMA SAFE DESIGN: Rudolph with his bright red nose is ready to play! Made without BPA, PVC, lead, and phthalate materials, our reindeer animal doll is safe and has a unique asthma-friendly design.
Rank #3
- Bebés (Dvd) (Import)
Allegations, a motion ruling, and a final outcome are different
- Complaint: Harvey’s filing states her allegations and the remedies she requested.
- Motion-stage order: The September 2024 decision dismissed some claims and let two proceed; it did not decide liability.
- Later case status: The available docket records do not establish the appeal’s final disposition or a final judgment.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
