Data centers seek independent assurance reports so customers can assess controls at a service organization they rely on. But SSAE 16 is a legacy label, not the current umbrella attestation standard: the AICPA says SSAE 18 completed the attestation clarity project and recodified and superseded SSAE Nos. 10–17, subject to listed exceptions. If a contract or procurement form still asks for “SSAE 16,” confirm which current report and criteria the customer actually needs.
Why assurance matters for data-center customers
When a data center operates infrastructure or related services for a customer, it functions as a service organization from that customer’s perspective. Outsourcing creates risks the customer must identify, assess, and address. The AICPA explains that customers and business partners seek information about a service organization’s control design, operation, and effectiveness.
An independent examination report can give customers and their financial statement auditors information to evaluate controls relevant to the service they use. The useful report depends on what the customer needs to assess; a report is not a general guarantee that every system is secure or every risk is eliminated.
SSAE 16 is a historical reference, not the current standard
The AICPA states that SSAE 18 completed its attestation clarity project and recodified and superseded SSAE Nos. 10–17, with listed exceptions. That means a present-day request should not treat SSAE 16 as the current all-purpose standard. Ask the auditor or consult current AICPA materials to confirm applicable standards and terminology.
#1 Best Overall
In practice, translate an older “SSAE 16” requirement into the assurance report the customer intends to receive—often a SOC report—and clarify its subject matter, scope, and applicable criteria before an examination is commissioned or relied on.
Choose SOC 1 or SOC 2 by the assurance question
The AICPA describes SOC 1 and SOC 2 as serving different purposes. A data-center customer may need one or both, depending on the service provided and what it must evaluate.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
| Report | What it examines | Intended use or audience |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 1 | Controls at a service organization likely relevant to user entities’ internal control over financial reporting. | Helps user entities and the CPAs auditing their financial statements evaluate the effect of service-organization controls. |
| SOC 2 | Controls relevant to selected Trust Services areas: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy. | Helps customers and business partners understand control design, operation, and effectiveness in a service organization’s system. |
When SOC 1 may fit
Consider SOC 1 when the controls over the data-center service could affect a customer’s financial reporting and the customer or its financial statement auditor needs to evaluate that effect. It is not simply a broad security report.
When SOC 2 may fit
Consider SOC 2 when the customer needs information about controls in one or more of the listed Trust Services areas. The relevant areas depend on the service and the customer’s assurance needs; the report should be read for its actual scope rather than assumed to cover every area.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteWhen customers may request both
A customer’s financial-reporting evaluation and its operational or trust-related assurance questions are distinct. Where both matter, ask whether separate SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports are needed and verify each report’s scope. The AICPA’s descriptions establish the purposes of the reports, not that every data center should obtain both.
Is a data center legally required to obtain a report?
The AICPA materials describe why customers seek assurance, but they do not establish a universal law requiring every data center to obtain a SOC report. A requirement may instead arise from a particular contract, a regulated customer’s obligations, or the details of the service relationship. Check the applicable contract and regulatory context before treating a report as legally mandatory.
Rank #4
What to do when a contract still says “SSAE 16”
- Ask what the customer needs to evaluate. Determine whether the concern is financial-reporting controls, a Trust Services area, or both.
- Name the intended report. Confirm whether the requirement is for SOC 1, SOC 2, or another specifically identified assurance deliverable rather than relying on the legacy label alone.
- Confirm scope and criteria with the auditor. Agree on the relevant service, systems, control areas, and current attestation requirements before relying on or commissioning the report.
- Resolve contract language explicitly. If the contract uses outdated terminology, document the current report and scope the parties intend to satisfy it.
For a current reference on SOC 2, the AICPA describes its SOC 2 guide as authoritative guidance for interpreting and applying updated attestation standards to SOC 2 and SOC 3 engagements. It is not a direct manual for SSAE 16.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
