Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The House Agriculture Committee announced the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 on February 13, but it did not hold the markup on the initially planned February 23 date. The markup was rescheduled to March 3 and continued March 4; the committee then advanced H.R. 7567 by a 34–17 vote. The House passed the bill 224–200 on April 30. It is a proposal, not established here as enacted law.
What happened to the February 23 markup?
February 23 was the House Agriculture Committee’s announced target, not the date of the markup. The committee’s official repository records the markup for March 3, 2026, with proceedings continuing on March 4. The committee ordered H.R. 7567 reported favorably by a vote of 34–17.
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| February 13, 2026 | The House Agriculture Committee released the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 and announced a February 23 markup. |
| March 3–4, 2026 | The committee held the rescheduled markup, which continued the following day. |
| April 30, 2026 | The House passed H.R. 7567 by a 224–200 vote, according to the House Agriculture Committee. |
| September 16, 2026 | A committee update reported that the Senate Agriculture Committee had advanced its own Agricultural Act of 2026. |
What did the House bill propose?
The measure addressed a wide range of farm and food policy, including farm support, conservation, credit, food assistance, trade, specialty crops, rural development, and regulation. The provisions below describe the proposal as reported at its February release; the committee’s amendment process means the released text and the version passed by the House should not be assumed to be identical.
Food for Peace and U.S. food purchases
The proposal would transfer administration of Food for Peace from the U.S. Agency for International Development to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It would also reserve a portion of program resources for purchasing and shipping U.S. food.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
Specialty-crop risk management
The bill included additional risk-management work for specialty crops and an advisory role focused on their insurance needs. These provisions addressed crop coverage; the available descriptions do not quantify how much coverage or protection farmers would gain.
Livestock production standards and Proposition 12
The proposal included language restricting states from imposing certain livestock-production standards on animals raised in other states. California’s Proposition 12 was a central example in coverage of the provision. The proposal therefore raised a federalism question: whether a state can condition sales in its market on how livestock was raised elsewhere. The release-stage descriptions do not establish the final legal scope of the House-passed language.
Pesticide labels and state authority
The bill proposed federal uniformity provisions for pesticide labeling. Contemporary coverage described language that would restrict certain state or court actions while preserving some state authority through exceptions under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The practical reach depends on the exact text and applicable exceptions; the proposal should not be read as eliminating every state role.
Farm credit limits
Contemporaneous reporting on the February 13 proposal described higher USDA loan limits. These are proposed limits, not amounts established here as current law or as enacted changes.
Rank #3
| Loan category | Proposed limit |
|---|---|
| Guaranteed operating loan | $3 million |
| Guaranteed farm ownership loan | $3.5 million |
| Direct operating loan | $750,000 |
| Direct farm ownership loan | $850,000 |
Other policy areas
Release-stage coverage also identified conservation, disaster assistance, rural broadband, nutrition, hemp, and agricultural trade promotion among the bill’s subjects. Those broad descriptions alone do not specify the precise program changes or their eventual effects; the relevant bill version is needed to assess individual provisions.
What arguments and concerns surrounded the proposal?
Supporters’ case was framed around more uniform standards, farm support, and greater certainty for agricultural programs. Critics raised concerns about state authority, pesticide-related liability, nutrition priorities, and whether the proposal responded adequately to farm conditions. These are competing policy arguments, not findings about what the bill would accomplish.
Rank #4
On February 13, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson said, “This bill provides modern policies for modern challenges and is shaped by years of listening to the needs of farmers, ranchers, and rural Americans.” The statement appeared in the committee’s release announcing the bill.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Did the bill become law?
The House passage and the Senate committee action are separate steps in the legislative process. The committee update dated September 16 reported that the Senate Agriculture Committee had advanced its own Agricultural Act of 2026. The official status information available for this account does not establish that the House and Senate measures were reconciled or that a farm bill had been enacted by October 8, 2026. The House-passed H.R. 7567 should therefore be described as a bill, not as current law.
Best Value
- Engaging Sensory Play: 20-page children's book features built-in buttons that make satisfying “pop” sounds with every press, turning reading into a sensory-rich, hands-on, interactive adventure for toddlers and preschoolers
- Sing, Count, and Pop on the Farm – Poke the dots to count down from 10 cows to 1 rooster while singing, reading along to “Old MacDonald’s Farm," building number recognition, rhythm, and fine motor skills
- Sized Just Right for Little Hands: Durable board book pages and chunky poke-able buttons are designed for small hands to grasp, press, and explore independently
- Travel-Friendly: Sturdy, compact design fits easily in backpacks or carry-ons for screen-free entertainment on road trips, airplanes, and outings
- Perfect Gift for Preschoolers – A great educational gift for birthdays, holidays, back-to-school, or classroom rewards—ideal for curious learners ages 3 to 7; product made with FSC-certified materials that support responsible forestry; applies to new inventory only (FSC C156584)
What is known about the bill’s expected effects?
The reported procedural record and descriptions of provisions do not include a standalone published estimate of the proposal’s expected economic, nutrition, or environmental impact. Loan-limit figures and program changes describe what the proposal would do on paper; they are not evidence of measured outcomes.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
