What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Agricultural groups are asking for different things in the next Farm Bill, reflecting the farmers, industries, and landscapes they represent. The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) emphasizes a broad set of state-level concerns; the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) prioritizes crop insurance, commodity programs, and export funding. Other organizations have backed specific conservation, specialty-crop, dairy-export, and farm-credit provisions. These are organization positions—not proof that every group agrees on every proposal, or that a supported provision became law.
What the major agricultural groups are asking for
The requests range from farm safety-net programs and trade to conservation and rural credit. The table distinguishes each organization’s constituency and stated priorities from the separate House and Senate proposals.
| Organization and constituency | Stated priority or requested action | Proposal or context |
|---|---|---|
| National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA); state agriculture departments | Five 2026 priorities: agricultural labor reform; animal disease preparedness and traceability; the Farm Bill; regional food procurement and distribution; and pesticide regulations. NASDA says the bill should support American agriculture and essential food and nutrition assistance programs. | NASDA’s organization-wide priorities; not a claim that every member state favors the same bill provisions. |
| National Corn Growers Association (NCGA); corn producers | Protect producer access to crop insurance and make it more affordable; strengthen Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage (ARC/PLC); increase international market-development funding. | NCGA’s support for bipartisan development and passage of a Farm Bill 2.0. |
| Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; conservation interests | Support for forest conservation easements and federal-forest provisions. | Senate Agricultural Act of 2026 provisions, as reflected in the organization’s statement collected by the Senate Agriculture Committee. |
| National Wild Turkey Federation; wildlife and habitat interests | Support for provisions addressing water, soil, and wildlife. | Senate Agricultural Act of 2026, according to the organization’s statement. |
| National Potato Council; specialty-crop producers | Support for specialty-crop economic relief. | Senate proposal, as described in the Council’s statement. |
| U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC); dairy exporters | Support for protecting use of common cheese names in export markets and for export-promotion investments. | Senate proposal, according to USDEC’s statement. |
| Farm Credit organizations and other agricultural lenders | Support for modernizing credit availability and improving access for young and beginning farmers, among other provisions. | Letters in a House Agriculture Committee stakeholder compilation. |
NASDA’s agenda reaches beyond Farm Bill text
NASDA’s five priorities include the Farm Bill, but also labor, animal-health preparedness and traceability, regional food procurement and distribution, and pesticide regulation. Its call for a bill that supports both agriculture and food and nutrition assistance reflects a state-department perspective broader than a single crop or commodity program. The priorities were selected by NASDA members for 2026; they should not be read as a uniform position by every state department on every provision.
NCGA focuses on the farm safety net and exports
NCGA has called for bipartisan development and passage of a Farm Bill 2.0. Its stated priorities are producer access to crop insurance and greater affordability, stronger ARC/PLC commodity programs, and more funding for international market development. The association’s requested annual funding targets are $400 million for the Market Access Program (MAP), up from $200 million, and $69 million for Foreign Market Development (FMD), up from $34.5 million. Those are NCGA’s proposed targets, not enacted appropriations.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match#1 Best Overall
Other groups back provisions tied to their sectors
The Senate Agriculture Committee’s June 2026 collection of stakeholder statements shows how support can attach to particular provisions rather than to every part of a bill. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation supported forest conservation easements and federal-forest measures; the National Wild Turkey Federation highlighted water, soil, and wildlife; the National Potato Council backed specialty-crop economic relief; and USDEC pointed to dairy export opportunities and protection for common cheese names in export markets. These statements document each organization’s reported position at that time, not agreement across agriculture or final enactment.
For farm credit, letters from Farm Credit organizations and other agricultural lenders in the House committee’s stakeholder compilation cited modernization of credit availability and access for young and beginning farmers, among other measures. Because the compilation is advocacy material, it establishes what its signatories supported; it is not an independent assessment of how a provision would affect loan access or farm finances.
House and Senate proposals are separate bills
The organizations’ positions sit alongside two distinct 2026 proposals. Their similar subject matter does not make them the same bill, and committee or chamber action does not by itself establish that a provision became law.
House: Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
The House Agriculture Committee describes provisions across 12 titles, including risk-management tools for specialty-crop producers, rural energy costs, market opportunities for U.S. commodities, credit, precision agriculture, and working-lands conservation. The committee page reports that the House passed the bill on April 30, 2026. The committee also says more than 500 organizations support its legislation; that is the committee’s characterization and is distinct from the individual letters in its stakeholder compilation.
Senate: Agricultural Act of 2026, or Farm Bill 2.0
The Senate Agriculture Committee’s separate proposal, the Agricultural Act of 2026, is branded Farm Bill 2.0. Its summary highlights rural infrastructure and services, producer financing, research, innovation and extension, and year-round E15 sales. In a July 7, 2026, release, the committee said its discussion draft incorporated more than 100 bipartisan measures and priorities. On September 16, 2026, the committee said it had advanced the bill out of committee. That is committee action, not evidence of final enactment.
Senate Agriculture Committee chairman John Boozman described the proposal this way: “The Agricultural Act of 2026 builds upon the investments in farm programs delivered through the Working Families Tax Cuts. A fully modernized farm bill means more certainty for America’s farm families, rural communities and food supply.” This is the chairman’s explanation of the Senate proposal, not an independent finding about its effects.
Rank #4
What the extension date does—and does not—establish
USDA’s Farmers.gov page says the 2018 Farm Bill was extended at existing funding levels through September 30, 2026, allowing programs including loans, disaster assistance, conservation, and crop insurance to continue during that extension. That date has passed. The cited USDA page does not establish what happened to those authorities afterward, so it cannot alone confirm the current status of any program. A reader making a lending, insurance, or program decision should check the relevant agency’s current guidance and applicable law rather than assume the extension continued or that a new bill replaced it.
Quick Recap
Best Value
How to read the groups’ priorities
- Identify the organization’s constituency. A crop association’s safety-net or export requests may differ from a state agriculture department’s broader agenda or a conservation group’s habitat priorities.
- Separate a request from bill text. An organization may support a provision, but that does not show it appears in both proposals or became law.
- Keep advocacy distinct from impact evidence. Stakeholder letters and statements establish the signatories’ views, not independent estimates of effects on farm income, credit access, or program outcomes.
- Check which proposal and date are being discussed. The House and Senate bills are separate, and the reported status can change as legislation proceeds.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
