Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteRolling Stone reported that Blackstone chair Steve Schwarzman gave $2 million to Pine Tree Results PAC on June 27, 2025, the day before Sen. Susan Collins voted to advance President Donald Trump’s tax bill to the Senate floor. Collins later voted against final passage. The dates establish a sequence, not proof that the contribution influenced her vote.
What happened, and when?
The account behind the headline is a sequence of reported events. Rolling Stone’s September 3, 2025 report said Schwarzman contributed $2 million to Pine Tree Results PAC, which it described as backing Collins. The next day, Collins voted for a procedural motion to advance H.R. 1. The article reported that the motion passed 51–49.
| Date | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| June 27, 2025 | Rolling Stone reported Schwarzman gave $2 million to Pine Tree Results PAC. | The reported recipient was a PAC, not Collins’s campaign directly. |
| June 28, 2025 | Collins voted for a procedural motion to advance H.R. 1 to the Senate floor; Rolling Stone reported the vote as 51–49. | This was a vote to proceed, not a vote to pass the bill. |
| July 1, 2025 | Rolling Stone reported Collins voted against final passage. | She did not cast a yes vote on the bill’s final passage. |
| July 4, 2025 | Public Law 119-21 was enacted, according to the Congressional Budget Office. | The legislation became law after the Senate votes. |
The contribution and vote details above are attributed to Rolling Stone; the CBO identifies July 4 as the enactment date for Public Law 119-21. The underlying FEC transaction record and Senate roll-call record were not independently reviewed for this account.
Did Susan Collins vote for Trump’s tax bill?
Not on final passage, according to Rolling Stone: the report says Collins voted against the bill on July 1. She did vote on June 28 for the procedural motion to advance it. Those are distinct Senate actions, so describing her simply as having “voted for the bill” would omit the final-passage vote and misstate the reported outcome.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
Was the Schwarzman contribution a direct donation to Collins?
No: the reported $2 million went to Pine Tree Results PAC. Collins’s press secretary, Blake Kernen, emphasized that the PAC was a separate Super PAC from Collins’s campaign operation. The reported connection is that Rolling Stone described the PAC as backing Collins; that does not make the contribution a direct campaign donation.
Does the timing prove the contribution affected Collins’s vote?
No. A contribution reported one day before a vote and the vote itself establish timing, but the available account does not establish that the donation caused or changed Collins’s decision. Kernen disputed that inference, saying: “The notion that Sen. Collins’ vote to proceed somehow helped Blackstone get this bill across the finish line is absurd.” That is the office’s response, not independent proof about motive.
Kernen also argued the procedural motion would have passed without Collins. The reported 51–49 result shows the motion passed, but it does not by itself settle the counterfactual question of what would have happened under different voting circumstances.
What did the law’s budget estimate say?
In a July 21, 2025 estimate of Public Law 119-21, the Congressional Budget Office projected a $3.4 trillion net increase in the unified deficit over 2025–2034 against its specified January 2025 baseline. CBO estimated the law would reduce direct spending by $1.1 trillion while reducing revenues by $4.5 trillion. These are overall budget effects, not a Medicaid-only estimate.
How the headline resurfaced
Common Dreams reported in March 2026 that Graham Platner reused the headline language in a campaign ad. That later campaign messaging is separate from Rolling Stone’s September 2025 report about the contribution and Senate votes.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
- Team of Rivals The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
Sources
- Rolling Stone report syndicated by Yahoo Finance, September 3, 2025.
- Congressional Budget Office, estimated budgetary effects of Public Law 119-21, July 21, 2025.
- Common Dreams coverage of Platner’s later campaign ad, March 2026.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
