What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
VUG and QQQ are not interchangeable growth ETFs. VUG tracks a large-cap growth index; QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100, an index of the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Vanguard’s June 30, 2026 fact sheet reports a 0.03% expense ratio for VUG, while Invesco’s QQQ page lists 0.18% for QQQ. That makes VUG cheaper by 0.15 percentage point a year on the stated fund fees, but the better fit depends on the exposure you want—not the fee alone.
What is the main difference between VUG and QQQ?
The funds begin with different index rules. VUG, the Vanguard Growth ETF, seeks to track the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. QQQ, the Invesco QQQ ETF, tracks the Nasdaq-100. Invesco describes that index as the 100 largest non-financial companies traded on Nasdaq. The index definition is not a promise that QQQ always holds exactly 100 securities.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That distinction matters more than the shared shorthand “growth ETF.” VUG’s mandate is explicitly to select large-cap growth stocks. QQQ’s index is defined by company size, exchange listing, and exclusion of financial companies; it is not simply another version of a broad large-cap growth index. Their holdings and portfolio weights can therefore differ, even when the funds own some of the same companies. The official sources cited here do not establish a current overlap percentage.
VUG’s June 30, 2026 fact sheet reports 153 stocks in the fund. As of that date, its ten largest holdings together made up 63.1% of net assets. Those are dated portfolio facts, not permanent features or a guarantee about how concentrated the fund will be later.
#1 Best Overall
- Compact & Portable Design: This Small Excel, Word, PowerPoint, & Windows Cheat Sheet Mouse Pad measures 11.8" x 9.8", offering a portable mouse pad. Its compact size fits in bags or laptop cases, suitable for professionals, students, or travelers.
- Multi-Software Shortcut Guide: Featuring essential shortcut keys for Excel, Word, PowerPoint, & Windows, this small mouse pad provides a quick reference for frequently used shortcuts, offering a reference designed to support workflow efficiency
- Smooth & Precise Surface: The finely-textured surface ensures precise mouse control, allowing for smooth and accurate movement during work or gaming sessions.
- Durable & Non-Slip Design: This Multi-Software Shortcut Mouse Pad features stitched edges to reduce fraying. The non-slip rubber base helps keep it securely in place, and the water-resistant fabric allows for easier maintenance.
- Clear Print Quality: Displays high-resolution printing intended to remain legible through regular use and cleaning
For a reader choosing between the two, the practical question is whether they want exposure based on a large-cap growth classification or exposure to the Nasdaq-100’s large non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies. Fees and concentration are important, but neither fund’s label or past popularity determines whether it belongs in a particular investor’s portfolio.
Put another way, the funds answer different portfolio questions. VUG’s index starts with a style category—large-cap growth—while QQQ starts with a particular exchange-listed company universe and excludes financial companies. Both can provide exposure to prominent large U.S. businesses, but the selection rules, holdings and resulting risks need not match. A ticker comparison alone cannot tell you how either fund fits alongside everything else you own.
How do the index strategies differ?
VUG: large-cap growth selection
VUG’s target is the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, as identified in Vanguard’s April 28, 2026 summary prospectus. It is designed to represent large-capitalization growth stocks. The word “growth” describes the index’s investment style, not a promise that its constituents will grow, that its price will rise, or that it will outperform another style.
Vanguard’s June 30, 2026 fact sheet shows why an index-based growth fund should not automatically be treated as broadly diversified across sectors. Technology represented 69.2% of VUG’s sector allocation on that date. A fund can hold many stocks and still have a substantial share of its assets exposed to a single sector or a limited group of large holdings.
The same fact sheet lists 153 stocks, yet the ten largest represented 63.1% of net assets. These two figures describe different aspects of the portfolio: the stock count indicates the number of positions, while the top-ten share shows how much weight was concentrated in its largest holdings. Neither measure by itself describes every source of risk, and both can change as index constituents, fund holdings and market values change.
VUG’s sector table also shows that the remaining allocation was not evenly distributed across many equally sized sectors. As of June 30, 2026, consumer discretionary accounted for 13.9%, industrials 7.6%, and health care 4.6%; all other listed categories were each 1.5% or less. This is useful context for reading the headline technology weight, but it remains a one-date snapshot rather than a forecast of future allocation.
QQQ: Nasdaq-100 exposure
Invesco says the Nasdaq-100 comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies traded on Nasdaq. QQQ tracks that index. This definition does not make QQQ a broad-market fund: companies must meet the index’s exchange-listing and non-financial criteria, rather than being selected specifically because they qualify as large-cap growth stocks.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Invesco’s QQQ overview says the fund’s holdings are disclosed daily, and its holdings and sector allocations page is the place to check current portfolio details. The holdings table was unavailable in the accessed page content for this comparison, so no current QQQ top holdings, constituent weights, sector percentages, or overlap with VUG can be stated here. Do not infer those figures from the index name or from a list published on a different date.
Rank #2
- [MULTIFUNCTIONAL]You'll get 2 pieces computer monitor memo boards that you can stick on the left and right edges of your monitor, and they're the perfect office desk organizers and accessories. Computer monitor side panels desktop organizer are suitable for home work or office,bringing convenience. Desktop memo is used to organize meeting memos, important messages, business cards, planning notes.Paste on the message board to keep track of important things and to-do items to prevent forgetting.
- [🌟HIGHLY QUALITY] The material of computer screen side note holder is transparent acrylic. Durable, simple, stylish, light weight, easy to use, not easy to fall off or break. This cute office supplies for women desk can be used for a long time. This computer desk accessories is waterproof and dirt resistance, and look simple and stylish. The transparent acrylic sticky note holder as cubicle accessories is easy to notice the context of your sticky notes.
- [📋Easy to use] Office must haves cool office gadgets for desk ready to tear, easy to install and remove, not easy to leave traces. You only need to peel off the protective film on the surface of the computer side board memo, wipe off the dust on the edge of the computer monitor, and then stick the desk essentials for women office on the right or left side of the tape, and you're done. A perfect gift for your colleagues, friends or classmates and family members or relatives
- [🏢MULTI-SCENE USE] This desk supplies computer memo board can be applied to home and office, clear your office decor for women, suitable for most computer monitors, screens and cabinets, you can put it where you think, this cute office decor serve as a reminder. Stick on the computer side. It’s a good office gadgets can remind work improve office productivity. Pasted cabinets, dressers, refrigerators, walls, etc as cubicle accessories. To make life more orderly.
- [💌NOTE] The adhesive force of the computer sticky note holder is very strong. It can not be directly pasted on the computer screen. It should pasted on the black edge of the screen. Narrow edge not recommended!!! If you are not satisfied with your purchase, or if the product is damaged or broken in transit, please let us know immediately. We will promptly solve your problem.
The index’s 100-company description applies to its definition; it should not be casually turned into a claim about the exact number of securities held by the ETF at any given moment. To compare a fund’s actual portfolio with another fund, use dated fund-level holdings disclosures. The index description explains the rules of the benchmark, while the holdings file provides a snapshot of the ETF’s positions.
Invesco describes QQQ as spanning multiple sectors and industries, but that qualitative statement does not quantify the allocation to any one sector. It therefore cannot establish whether QQQ has a higher or lower technology weight than VUG on a particular date. A numerical comparison requires current, dated sector data for both funds and consistent sector classifications.
What do the available holdings and sector figures show?
The table separates the comparable information that is established from portfolio details that require a live, dated holdings disclosure. VUG’s figures below are a snapshot dated June 30, 2026; they should not be read as current weights indefinitely. The QQQ mandate and expense ratio are from Invesco’s official product page, accessed October 9, 2026.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →| Measure | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Index tracked | CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index | Nasdaq-100 Index: the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq |
| Fund stock count | 153 stocks as of June 30, 2026 | Invesco’s index definition describes 100 companies; that does not establish the fund’s exact security count |
| Ten largest holdings | 63.1% of net assets as of June 30, 2026 | Current weights not stated in the accessible official holdings table |
| Technology allocation | 69.2% as of June 30, 2026 | Current sector percentage not stated in the accessible official page content |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% in Vanguard’s June 30, 2026 fact sheet | 0.18% total expense ratio on Invesco’s official product page, accessed October 9, 2026 |
Vanguard’s June 30, 2026 fact sheet reports the following VUG sector allocations: technology 69.2%, consumer discretionary 13.9%, industrials 7.6%, health care 4.6%, telecommunications 1.5%, financials 1.1%, real estate 1.0%, basic materials 0.4%, energy 0.3%, consumer staples 0.2%, utilities 0.1%, and other 0.0%. The percentages describe the fund at that date; weights can change as prices move and the portfolio changes.
Those VUG figures help illustrate concentration, but they do not support an exact side-by-side sector comparison with QQQ. Invesco says QQQ spans multiple sectors and industries, but without dated sector weights that description cannot tell a reader how much QQQ has in technology or another sector. Likewise, the available sources do not support a precise overlap calculation. If those details affect your decision, consult both funds’ current holdings and sector disclosures on the same date and compare the same type of weight.
For an overlap check, a useful comparison would need each fund’s dated holdings and weights, not just a list of familiar company names. A company appearing in both portfolios does not mean it has the same weight in each, and a count of shared names is not the same as the percentage of assets invested in shared holdings. Compare the disclosure dates and the weight methodology before drawing conclusions. No overlap percentage can be responsibly supplied without those inputs.
When reviewing a current disclosure, look beyond the top names if concentration matters to you. The top-ten total indicates the combined weight of the largest positions; the sector breakdown describes another dimension of exposure. Together, these can provide more context than a raw holdings count, but they still do not replace examining the full portfolio or considering how it overlaps with your other investments.
Recommended Free Tools
How much do VUG and QQQ fees differ?
Vanguard reports a 0.03% expense ratio for VUG in its June 30, 2026 fact sheet; its April 28, 2026 SEC-filed summary prospectus also lists 0.03% total annual fund operating expenses. Invesco lists QQQ’s total expense ratio as 0.18% on its official product page, accessed October 9, 2026. The difference is 0.15 percentage point per year.
Rank #3
- Stay Organized with Ease: Our To Do List Notepad provides multiple sections with plenty of space to jot down all of your important tasks.A versatile office supply perfect for daily task management, helping you keep track of everything that needs to be done and prioritize effectively.
- Achieve Your Productivity Goals: Begin each day on a positive note, reminding you of your potential, strength, and the significance of staying focused on your goals. Our Daily Checklist Notepad is the ultimate tool to streamline your daily planning and elevate your productivity. With a clear and concise overview of your tasks, you can effortlessly prioritize what truly matters and make consistent strides towards achieving your goals.
- Reliable and Stylish: Our to do list planner combines functionality with durability. With a transparent PP cover, the inner pages are well-protected from dirt and wear. Additionally, the back cover is crafted with thick paperboard, offering a stable surface for your writing needs. Each notepad includes 52 pages of high-quality, 100gsm paper, which is thick and non-bleeding, resulting in a smooth and enjoyable writing experience.
- Versatile Use: This daily checklist notepad, suitable for teacher supplies and a wide range of applications, proves invaluable in various settings including work, school, and home. Whether you need to organize your daily tasks, plan a project, or create a grocery list, this notepad serves as the ideal tool. Its compact size ensures easy portability, allowing you to conveniently carry it with you throughout your day.
- Perfect Present for Anyone: Our Daily To-Do List Notepad is the perfect present for those who value organization and productivity. With its stylish design and versatility, this office desk accessory is also a practical addition to school supplies. Suitable for students, professionals, and homemakers alike, it helps keep tasks and priorities in check effortlessly.
As a simple arithmetic illustration, applying those rates to $10,000 for one year gives $3 at 0.03% and $18 at 0.18%, a $15 difference. This illustration uses the published rates and a constant $10,000 balance; it is not a return forecast and excludes brokerage commissions, bid–ask spreads, and any premium or discount to net asset value (NAV). Actual fund expenses accrue through the fund rather than normally appearing as a separate bill for that exact amount.
The illustration isolates only the recurring stated fund expense rates. It does not show what an investor will earn or lose, since investment performance can move the account value up or down, nor does it include costs tied to the trade itself. A difference in expense ratios is a concrete comparison of published fees, but it is not a complete estimate of total ownership cost or a conclusion about which fund will perform better.
An expense ratio is one component of ownership cost, not a complete cost comparison. ETF investors may also face trading costs when buying or selling, and the share price on an exchange can differ from the fund’s NAV. Invesco identifies spreads, commissions, and premiums or discounts to NAV as additional costs for QQQ; Vanguard’s prospectus discusses brokerage costs and secondary-market price differences for VUG. How much those costs matter depends on the transaction and trading conditions, so the 0.15-point fund-fee gap should not be mistaken for a guaranteed difference in an investor’s total cost.
For a person who trades frequently, bid–ask spreads and commissions may deserve closer attention than they would for someone who trades less often, though the actual effect depends on the broker and the market at the time of each trade. A premium or discount to NAV is another separate consideration: buying above NAV or selling below NAV can affect the transaction price. These costs are not captured by comparing the two expense ratios alone.
How do you choose between the two?
Use the index exposure as the first decision, then consider concentration, costs, and your wider portfolio. This is a framework for comparing fund characteristics, not a personalized recommendation.
- Choose the exposure you mean. If you specifically want an index built around large-cap growth stocks, VUG’s stated mandate is the closer match. If you specifically want Nasdaq-100 exposure, QQQ tracks that index. Neither description is a substitute for checking the underlying index rules.
- Check concentration in the context of your other investments. VUG’s 69.2% technology allocation and 63.1% top-ten share are meaningful dated concentration measures as of June 30, 2026. For QQQ, obtain current holdings and sector weights from Invesco before making a numerical comparison. If you already own broad U.S. equity funds or individual large technology companies, look at the combined exposure rather than evaluating either ETF in isolation.
- Compare recurring expenses without treating them as the whole bill. The stated rates favor VUG on fund operating expenses. Also consider how you trade, including any brokerage commission, bid–ask spread, and difference between market price and NAV.
- Use matched data for any performance comparison. Compare the same start and end dates, use consistent NAV or market-price returns, account for distributions and fees consistently, and remember that past performance does not guarantee future results. The facts available here do not establish a matched-period performance winner.
- Review current disclosures before placing a trade. Holdings and sector allocations change. Use current fund materials for current weights rather than carrying a dated snapshot forward.
A practical way to apply those steps is to write down the exposure you are trying to add before comparing performance charts. Then check the fund’s stated benchmark, the current dated portfolio, and how those positions would combine with your existing holdings. If your primary concern is the sector or company concentration of the combined portfolio, do not rely on a fund name or a single top-line stock count; review actual weights.
If you compare performance, make sure the periods line up and that both figures measure the same thing. Market-price returns reflect ETF trading prices, while NAV returns use the value of the underlying portfolio; they can differ over a period. Distributions and fees should also be treated consistently. A chart with mismatched dates or return methods can create a misleading comparison, and historical results do not guarantee future performance.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsWhat risks should investors understand?
Both ETFs invest in equities and can lose value. Holding an index ETF does not guarantee a positive return or protect an investor from a decline in the companies or market segments represented by the index.
Rank #4
- 【Adjustable & Ergonomic】：This laptop stand can be adjusted to a comfortable height and angle according to your actual needs, letting you fix posture and reduce your neck fatigue, back pain and eye strain. Very comfortable for working in home, office and outdoor.
- 【Sturdy & Protective】 ：Made of sturdy metal, it can support up to 17.6 lbs (8kg) weight on top; With 2 rubber mats on the hook and anti-skid silicone pads on top & bottom, it can secure your laptop in place and maximum protect your device from scratches and sliding. Moreover, smooth edges will never hurt your hands.
- 【Heat Dissipation】 ：The top of the laptop stand is designed with multiple ventilation holes. The open design offers greater ventilation and more airflow to cool your laptop during operation other than it just lays flat on the table.
- 【Portable & Foldable】：The foldable design allows you to easily slip it in your backpack. Ideal for people who travel for business a lot.
- 【Broad Compatibility】：Our desktop book stand is compatible with all laptops from 10-15.6 inches, such as MacBook Air/ Pro, Google Pixelbook, Dell XPS, HP, ASUS, Lenovo ThinkPad, Acer, Chromebook and Microsoft Surface, etc.Be your ideal companion in Home, Office & Outdoor.
Vanguard’s prospectus says growth-oriented exposure may underperform other investment styles and identifies technology-sector concentration as a risk that can affect results. It also discusses tracking error—the possibility that the fund’s performance differs from its target index—and the possibility that ETF shares trade at a premium or discount to NAV.
Invesco warns that QQQ is non-diversified and that investments focused in a sector, such as technology, are more exposed to volatility than more diversified investments. These risk statements do not establish that either fund is riskier in every market environment; they identify ways each fund’s structure and exposure can affect results.
For either ETF, an exchange-traded share price is not guaranteed to equal NAV at the moment you trade. A wide bid–ask spread or a premium or discount can affect the price paid or received, while commissions may add to transaction cost. These mechanics are separate from the expense ratio and from changes in the underlying holdings.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Index tracking also does not eliminate risk. VUG’s prospectus notes the possibility that its results may differ from those of its target index. More generally, a fund can deliver a different result from an index over a measurement period, and sector or style exposure can affect returns relative to other parts of the market. The relevant point for a comparison is not to assume that an index label guarantees exact performance or protection against losses.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Where can you verify current fund details?
Vanguard’s fact sheet provides a dated portfolio snapshot, while the SEC-filed summary prospectus describes VUG’s objectives, expenses, and risks. Invesco’s QQQ overview gives the index definition and expense ratio; its holdings and sector allocations page is the relevant place to check disclosed portfolio data. Because fund holdings, sector allocations, and market prices can change, use the latest available official disclosures when acting on current information.
For a like-for-like comparison, note the date on each document and make sure the weights refer to the same time period. Confirm whether a figure describes the index or the ETF, and whether a return is based on NAV or market price. A prior dated fact sheet remains useful for understanding what the fund held then, but it should not be presented as a current portfolio snapshot.
- Vanguard Growth ETF fact sheet, as of June 30, 2026
- Vanguard Growth ETF summary prospectus, April 28, 2026
- Invesco QQQ ETF overview
- Invesco QQQ holdings and sector allocations
Frequently Asked Questions
Is VUG or QQQ the better growth ETF?
Neither is automatically better. VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100, defined as the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. The right comparison depends on which index exposure you want and how it fits with your other investments.
Which has the lower expense ratio, VUG or QQQ?
VUG’s June 30, 2026 Vanguard fact sheet reports 0.03%; Invesco lists QQQ’s total expense ratio at 0.18% on its product page, accessed October 9, 2026. That is a 0.15 percentage-point annual difference, or $15 per $10,000 for one year in a simple arithmetic illustration. Trading costs are separate.
Best Value
- Twin-Ball Design : Hiacry gel pen features a double ball conical tip that reduces writing resistance and provides a stable and smooth writing experience. 0.7mm quick drying black ink ensures no jumping, leakage or seepage.
- Quick-Dry Long Lasting Ink：0.7mm black ink can slide effortlessly, dry immediately, & is not easily dirty. It has a high-capacity reservoir (up to 1300 meters), which is very suitable for left-handed & right-handed users.
- Sleek Design for Journaling & Planning: Engineered with a low center of gravity and precision tip for steady ink flow, these journaling pens excel at note-taking, sketching, planning, and more. They combine stylish pens with top-tier performance.
- Rolling Ball Design：The pocket clip with roll ball design can be easily attached to notebook pockets and binders, in addition, the fidget on the pen clip is also a small toy for your daily thinking to relieve stress.
- Comfortable Non-Slip Grip：The ergonomic pen barrel has a soft rubberized coating for a comfortable, non-slip grip, so you won't get fatigued even after long hours of writing.
Does QQQ always hold exactly 100 stocks?
The Nasdaq-100 is defined by Invesco as the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. That index definition does not establish that QQQ always holds exactly 100 securities. Check current fund disclosures for the ETF’s holdings.
Which fund has more technology exposure?
Vanguard reported that technology made up 69.2% of VUG’s sector allocation on June 30, 2026. The official QQQ page content used for this comparison did not provide a dated sector percentage, so it does not support a numerical answer about which fund had more technology exposure. Compare current dated sector disclosures for both funds.
Do VUG and QQQ have the same holdings?
They may hold some of the same companies, but their index rules differ. The sources cited here do not establish a current overlap percentage or a complete current QQQ holdings comparison. Use both funds’ dated holdings files to compare shared names and their portfolio weights.
Is QQQ more diversified than VUG?
The available figures do not establish a direct numerical diversification ranking. VUG had 153 stocks and a 63.1% top-ten share as of June 30, 2026; Invesco warns that QQQ is non-diversified. To compare current concentration, examine dated holdings and sector weights for both funds rather than relying only on the number of names.
Are expense ratios the only costs to compare?
No. Brokerage commissions, bid–ask spreads, and premiums or discounts to NAV can affect the price of an ETF trade. The stated expense ratios compare recurring fund operating expenses, not every cost an investor may incur.
Can I compare VUG and QQQ by past returns?
You can compare historical performance, but match the start and end dates, use NAV or market-price returns consistently, and handle distributions and fees the same way. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and the facts presented here do not establish a matched-period performance winner.
The Bottom Line
VUG and QQQ offer different index exposures: large-cap growth through VUG and Nasdaq-100 exposure through QQQ. VUG’s published expense ratio is lower, but that alone does not determine fit, total trading cost, concentration, or future performance. Compare current dated holdings and sector disclosures, consider the funds alongside your existing portfolio, and remember that either ETF can lose value.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
