The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →The Senate passed S.J.Res. 88 on October 30, 2025, but that vote did not itself stop or repeal tariffs. The resolution would terminate the national emergency President Donald Trump declared on April 2, 2025, to impose global tariffs only if the House also passed it and it became law. The available dated accounts describe House inaction through January 22, 2026; they do not establish the resolution’s later status.
What did the Senate pass?
On October 30, 2025, the Senate passed S.J.Res. 88, a joint resolution introduced by Senator Ron Wyden on October 7. The Senate legislative clerk described it as a resolution “terminating the national emergency declared to impose global tariffs.” Its operative text invoked section 202 of the National Emergencies Act and specified the emergency Trump declared on April 2, 2025, in Executive Order 14257.
The measure was limited to that emergency declaration. It was not a repeal of every tariff imposed by Trump, including tariffs based on other legal authorities.
Did the Senate vote immediately stop the tariffs?
No. The resolution’s text said the emergency would terminate “effective on the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.” Senate passage was only one chamber’s approval; it did not enact the resolution or, by itself, terminate the emergency. The House also had to pass it and the measure had to become law.
#1 Best Overall
What happened to S.J.Res. 88 in the House?
The dated records describe efforts to bring the Senate-passed measure to a House vote, but do not verify its eventual disposition after January 2026.
- November 17, 2025: House members wrote to Speaker Mike Johnson urging consideration of three Senate-passed resolutions: S.J.Res. 81, S.J.Res. 77, and S.J.Res. 88. The letter said House leadership had blocked similar measures from floor consideration through March 2026. That is the lawmakers’ characterization in an advocacy letter, not a neutral House status report.
- January 22, 2026: House floor remarks entered in the Congressional Record said the majority had continued to block an up-or-down vote on a Senate-passed resolution to terminate global tariffs. Those remarks document what the speaker said on that date; they do not establish what happened afterward.
As of October 4, 2026, the sources available for this account do not establish whether the House later considered or passed S.J.Res. 88, or whether it was enacted. The January remarks should not be treated as proof of its status on that later date.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Was this the same as the Senate measures on Brazil and Canada?
No. S.J.Res. 88 addressed the emergency declared for global tariffs. The Senate record and the November House members’ letter also referred to separate resolutions concerning Brazil and Canada. Those measures targeted different tariff emergencies and should not be conflated with the global-tariff resolution. The cited accounts identify S.J.Res. 81, S.J.Res. 77, and S.J.Res. 88 among the measures the House members wanted considered, but do not establish which of the first two corresponded to Brazil or Canada.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s office called the October 30 vote the fourth bipartisan Senate vote to end emergency tariff powers. His office named Republican Senators Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, and Mitch McConnell as supporters. That “fourth” characterization and the list of supporters are attributed to Whitehouse’s office.
Recommended Free Tools
What tariff-cost estimates were cited during the debate?
Several figures were cited in connection with the vote, but they come from different sources and describe different estimates or periods. They should not be treated as directly comparable or as settled measures of what a particular household will pay.
- About $2,800 per average family: Senator Ron Wyden said on the Senate floor on October 30, 2025, that families would see about $2,800 in higher costs because of Trump’s tariffs and taxes. This is Wyden’s statement, not an independently verified estimate here.
- Less than 10% of tariff costs paid by foreign companies “this summer”: Whitehouse’s office attributed this estimate to Goldman Sachs in its October 30, 2025, release.
- An extra $1,700 for American families in 2025: Whitehouse’s office attributed this estimate to Yale researchers in the same release.
The underlying Goldman Sachs and Yale analyses are not established by those attributions alone. The figures differ in scope, period, and source chain, so they do not show that every household would face either stated amount.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
