There is no single, comparable economic score for every Republican presidency since 1921 in the sources available here. The clearest broad comparison is a study of postwar real GDP growth: across its selected presidential terms through the first quarter of 2013, growth averaged 2.54% under Republican presidents and 4.35% under Democratic presidents. Those are descriptive averages, not proof that presidents caused the difference—and they do not cover the Harding, Coolidge, or Hoover years.
What was the economic impact of Republican presidents since 1921?
The answer depends on what you measure and which years you include. Republican administrations have governed in sharply different economic eras, so a party-wide average can hide variation among presidents and the conditions each inherited. A fair assessment separates observed economic outcomes from explanations of why they occurred.
![Presidents for Kids - The Ultimate Presidential Collection | 45 Activity Books Set | Children's U.S. History Book Bundle with Fun Facts, Activities & ... For Kids [Paperback] Presidents For Kids](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51hEnEa4CSL._SL160_.jpg)
The U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provides historical economic indicators beginning in 1949, including output, prices, labor measures, interest rates, income, and potential GDP. That series cannot supply a comparable record for Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, or Herbert Hoover. For those administrations, the postwar indicator series should not be treated as if it covered the 1920s and early 1930s.
How did the economy perform under Republican presidents in the postwar comparison?
Alan S. Blinder and Mark W. Watson’s 2014 paper, Presidents and the Economy: An Econometric Exploration, reports average annualized real GDP growth of 2.54% under Republican presidents and 4.35% under Democratic presidents in its 1947 Q1–2013 Q1 sample. The study compares seven complete Democratic terms and nine complete Republican terms; it is not a calculation for every presidential year since 1921.
#1 Best Overall
| Party in the study | Average annualized real GDP growth | Sample basis |
|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2.54% | Nine complete presidential terms in the study’s 1947 Q1–2013 Q1 sample |
| Democratic | 4.35% | Seven complete presidential terms in the study’s 1947 Q1–2013 Q1 sample |
This is a comparison of measured growth during selected terms, not an estimate of the effect of electing a president from either party. It also answers only one part of the economic question: GDP growth does not by itself describe employment, inflation, household income, or federal debt.
Why the growth gap is not a presidential verdict
Economic outcomes reflect decisions and events beyond the White House. Congress writes and passes laws and budgets; the Federal Reserve sets monetary policy independently; and economic conditions can be affected by international developments and other shocks. Timing matters as well: a president may begin a term amid a recession or inflationary pressures that originated earlier.
Blinder and Watson say that “oil shocks, productivity shocks, international growth shocks, and (perhaps) shocks to consumer expectations about the future jointly explain about half of the partisan gap.” The authors also describe their estimate as sensitive to lag assumptions. Their finding identifies possible contributors to a historical pattern; it does not establish that any one president caused the pattern or explain the performance of every administration.
Which economic measures should be compared?
A broader comparison should use consistent definitions and time windows for each administration. It should distinguish changes from averages and calendar-year results from fiscal-year budget figures.
- Real GDP growth: measures inflation-adjusted output, but a term average and a start-to-end change answer different questions.
- Employment and unemployment: capture labor-market conditions, which can respond with a lag to changing economic conditions.
- Inflation or price levels: distinguish the rate at which prices rise from the accumulated change in prices over a term.
- Federal deficits and debt relative to GDP: show the budget balance and the scale of debt against the economy. They are affected by tax and spending laws, economic conditions, and inherited obligations.
The Office of Management and Budget’s historical tables provide receipts, outlays, deficits, debt, and GDP-related series, with cited tables extending through fiscal year 2025. Because federal fiscal years do not align exactly with presidential terms or calendar years, budget figures should be labeled by fiscal year rather than casually attributed to a president’s calendar-year record.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the available records can—and cannot—show
The Department of State’s official chronology identifies Republican administrations from Harding through George W. Bush, but the cited chronology ends in 2008 and is not an economic dataset. It does not establish the full roster of administrations after that date. The CBO historical series begins in 1949, while OMB’s budget tables cover fiscal measures rather than a complete measure of presidential economic impact.
The annual Economic Report of the President, produced by the Council of Economic Advisers, is another source for economic analysis and data appendices. GovInfo makes reports available from 1996 onward, along with selected earlier editions. These records can help readers examine particular measures and periods, but the figures still need to be interpreted in context rather than treated as a causal ranking of presidents.
Accordingly, the defensible conclusion is limited but useful: the cited postwar study finds lower average annualized real GDP growth during its sampled Republican terms than during its sampled Democratic terms. It does not establish a comprehensive economic-impact ranking of Republican presidents since 1921, and the available CBO series cannot fill in the early administrations on the same basis.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesQuick Recap
Best Value
- Sebastian C. Adams was a 19th-century educator and minister who spent years drawing this chart by hand before publishing it in 1871. He wanted ordinary families to see how the Bible and world history fit together, not as two separate stories, but as one. This edition carries that same purpose: 21 full-size panels, a hardcover case that keeps them together, and a chart you can open with your children the way parents did more than a century ago.
- There is something almost overwhelming about seeing six thousand years laid out side by side. While one kingdom rises, another is already fading. While prophets speak in one land, armies are marching in another. This synchronological chart places sacred and secular history in parallel columns, using the same Ussher chronology that generations of North American families learned in Sunday school. Parents will recognize it. Their children will see it for the first time.
- Fold it open like a book, or stretch it across the floor and watch it run twenty-three feet from wall to wall. Twenty-one panels unfold into one continuous stream of time, from Creation to the late 19th century. This is the kind of thing you gather the family around on a Sunday afternoon, or leave on a classroom wall for a semester. Kids who see the whole sweep of history stretched out before them start asking questions you never expected.
- This edition preserves the 19th-century voice of the original chart—its handwritten commentary, its period artwork, and the way it reads like a document from another time. It is the same chart that hung in libraries and classrooms in the 1870s, inviting readers to trace the rise and fall of nations, the lives of prophets and kings, and the quiet turning points that shaped the world. You are not just looking at history. You are reading it the way a 19th-century student would have.
- Some resources are meant to be studied. This one is meant to be lived with. Homeschool families use it as a spine for world history. Bible study groups unfold it on a long table. Parents tell us their kids keep it open on the floor, tracing the line from Adam to Abraham to David to Christ. It also makes a gift that says something: here is the whole story, from the beginning, in your hands.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
