Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThe ₹3,000-crore figure refers to roughly ₹2,992 crore paid nationwide to 42.16 lakh beneficiaries later deemed ineligible, according to a 2021 parliamentary statement. It is not proof that ₹3,000 crore was stolen in one coordinated fraud, nor does the available reporting establish that Narendra Modi directed wrongdoing. A separate Assam inquiry, reported by Scroll in 2022, found extensive problems with beneficiary verification and described allegations of unauthorized access and improper entries.
What PM-KISAN provides—and who checks eligibility
PM-KISAN is a central-sector income-support scheme launched in February 2019. Eligible landholding farmer families receive ₹6,000 a year in three equal installments through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT). The Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare describes cultivable landholding as the primary eligibility criterion, subject to specified exclusions.
States and union territories identify and verify beneficiaries. The central system also uses identity, payment-account, government employment or pension, and income-tax checks. A 2025 Ministry release said land seeding, Aadhaar-based payment and e-KYC had become mandatory; payments may be stopped when required steps are incomplete.
PM-KISAN remains active. In July 2026, the Prime Minister’s Office announced Cabinet approval to continue it from 2026–27 through 2030–31, with an outlay of ₹3.15 lakh crore. The announcement reported more than ₹4.47 lakh crore transferred through 23 installments and over 9.49 crore recipients of the 23rd installment. These are government-reported scheme totals, not figures about the alleged irregularities.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
What the ₹3,000-crore figure actually measures
In a 2021 parliamentary response, the Union agriculture minister said ₹2,992 crore had to be recovered from 42.16 lakh ineligible beneficiaries. Scroll’s May 2022 investigation rounded that national figure to ₹3,000 crore. The beneficiaries deemed ineligible included people described as non-farmers, government employees, minors, deceased people, people with duplicate entries, and people whose addresses could not be verified.
That aggregate is the value of payments made to people later classified as ineligible. It does not, by itself, establish that every recipient knowingly committed fraud, that the entire amount was deliberately embezzled, or that one group coordinated the payments. Those are separate claims requiring evidence about particular people, transactions and decisions.
What the Assam inquiry found
Scroll reported that Assam ordered an inquiry led by then additional chief secretary Jishnu Barua after irregularities surfaced. According to Scroll’s account of the inquiry, 1,559,286 of 3,120,160 validated beneficiaries were found ineligible. The report said 72% of those ineligible beneficiaries could not be traced at the addresses on their identity documents; 16.7% were described as non-farm beneficiaries, including people without land, deceased people or minors; and 8.17% involved multiple entries. In Barpeta district, 79.5% of listed beneficiaries were found ineligible after verification.
These are Assam inquiry figures reported by Scroll in 2022. They are not the same population or measure as the nationwide ₹2,992-crore total reported for 2021, and should not be added to it or treated as a national rate.
Credential and enrollment concerns
Scroll’s account also described official account credentials and one-time passwords being shared or sold, rapid beneficiary additions during a short enrollment window, and weaknesses in authentication and data approval. It said the inquiry identified officials liable for administrative failures and described credential sharing as a security breach. Assam’s PM-KISAN nodal officer, Debjit Neog, characterized a particular reported incident as “a case of an organised cyber heist.” That is his description of that incident, not a judicial finding about the whole scheme.
Allegations, FIRs and responsibility
The report described allegations that officials and intermediaries were involved and noted denials and competing accounts of responsibility. It also reported FIRs in several districts. An inquiry’s findings about administrative shortcomings and the filing of an FIR are not the same as a criminal conviction; individual criminal responsibility must be established separately.
Rank #4
How the reported payments and recoveries differ
| Figure | What it refers to | Attribution and date |
|---|---|---|
| ₹2,992 crore; 42.16 lakh beneficiaries | Nationwide payments that the government said had to be recovered from beneficiaries deemed ineligible; Scroll rounded the amount to ₹3,000 crore. | Union agriculture minister’s parliamentary statement, 2021, as reported by Scroll in 2022. |
| ₹335 crore | Amount reported as recovered from fraudulent beneficiaries. | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare parliamentary answer, 2024. |
| ₹416 crore | Amount reported as recovered from ineligible beneficiaries nationwide. | Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, March 2025. |
| ₹4.47 lakh crore; more than 9.49 crore recipients | Transfers through 23 installments and recipients of the 23rd installment, respectively; these are scheme-wide totals, not recovery figures. | Prime Minister’s Office announcement, July 2026. |
The recovery figures come from different government statements, use different descriptions of the recipients, and refer to different reporting dates. They should not be subtracted from the ₹2,992-crore figure to infer a current unpaid balance. The July 2026 continuation announcement did not provide a newer cumulative recovery figure.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What is—and is not—established about the “scam” claim
- Established in the cited parliamentary statement: the government said ₹2,992 crore had to be recovered from 42.16 lakh ineligible beneficiaries nationwide.
- Reported about Assam: Scroll’s account of the state inquiry described a large number of ineligible records and significant weaknesses in enrollment and credential controls.
- Not established by those figures alone: that all ineligible payments were criminal theft, that a single coordinated conspiracy caused the national total, or that Narendra Modi personally directed wrongdoing.
- Not independently verified here: a claim that a CAG performance audit established the specific ₹3,000-crore figure. A 2024 parliamentary speech reportedly attributed it to the CAG, but the underlying CAG finding is not established by the sources cited for this article.
A 2023 Rajya Sabha question asked whether more than ₹3,000 crore had gone to people using unauthorized usernames and unintended beneficiaries. The government’s answer described eligibility and validation processes but did not directly confirm the premise. The question itself is not evidence that unauthorized usernames accounted for the national total.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Used Book in Good Condition
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
