Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsPalo Alto Networks completed its purchase of selected IBM QRadar software-as-a-service assets on August 31, 2024—not IBM’s entire QRadar business. The deal was designed to move eligible QRadar SaaS customers toward Palo Alto’s Cortex XSIAM platform. Palo Alto’s first post-close figures showed substantial customer interest, but its headline pipeline was prospective business, not revenue. And the August 31, 2026 end-of-life date for specified QRadar SaaS products has now passed; customers should confirm the status of their exact product and contract with Palo Alto. IBM QRadar on-premises products were not covered by that SaaS sunset.
What Palo Alto Networks bought from IBM
The transaction transferred certain QRadar SaaS intellectual-property rights, customer relationships and software-as-a-service customer contracts. Palo Alto also described the acquired assets as including related cloud security-threat-management products. It was not a purchase of every QRadar product or IBM’s entire security business. Palo Alto’s SEC filing describing the acquired assets and its closing announcement specify the SaaS-focused scope.
IBM retained its QRadar on-premises offerings. The distinction matters: the later Palo Alto end-of-life policy applies to specified acquired QRadar SaaS products, not automatically to organizations running QRadar on premises.
Deal timeline
- May 15, 2024: IBM and Palo Alto announced the agreement and broader partnership, including a path for QRadar SaaS customers to move to Cortex XSIAM.
- August 31, 2024: The transaction closed.
- September 4, 2024: Palo Alto publicly announced the closing.
- August 31, 2026: The lifecycle date for specified QRadar SaaS products. That date has elapsed; customers need to confirm the product-specific support and contract position rather than assume continued service.
The closing date is reported in the IBM filing; the original agreement and on-premises treatment appear in the May 2024 announcement. The applicable SaaS products and lifecycle date are set out in Palo Alto’s end-of-life policy.
#1 Best Overall
- Compact and Efficient Design: The FortiGate 40F is designed for small to mid-sized businesses and enterprise branch offices, featuring a compact, fanless desktop form factor that ensures quiet operation and minimizes space usage.
- Robust Connectivity Options: Equipped with 5 GE RJ45 ports, including 1 WAN port and 4 internal ports, this model provides essential connectivity and flexibility for various network configurations in a small-scale environment.
- High-Performance Security: Offers up to 1 Gbps IPS throughput and 600 Mbps threat protection throughput, using Fortinet’s purpose-built security processor technology to deliver industry-leading performance and protection for SSL encrypted traffic.
- Advanced Threat Protection: Integrated with Fortinet’s AI-powered FortiGuard Labs, the FortiGate 40F offers comprehensive cybersecurity, identifying and mitigating both known and unknown threats to maintain robust security across your network.
- Simplified Management and Deployment: Features a user-friendly management console that provides comprehensive network automation and visibility, coupled with Zero Touch Integration with Fortinet’s Security Fabric for easy deployment.
What the deal cost—and why the headline figures differ
IBM reported receiving $500 million in cash at closing. That was the initial cash consideration, not the full eventual economic cost: the agreement also provided for contingent payments tied to qualifying customer transactions, including migrations of QRadar on-premises customers to Cortex XSIAM. Palo Alto later recorded approximately $1.1426 billion in total purchase consideration, including the fair value of contingent consideration. Its accounting estimate anticipated post-closing payments through the fiscal quarter ending October 2028. See the IBM 2024 filing and Palo Alto filing.
IBM recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $351 million at closing. IBM’s 2025 filing said QRadar migration and transition services did not materially affect its consolidated financial statements during that year. That statement does not establish the financial outcome for individual customers or the profitability of the migration program. See IBM’s 2025 filing.
Why Palo Alto wanted the QRadar customer base
Palo Alto presented Cortex XSIAM as a broader security-operations destination rather than a like-for-like QRadar replacement. The company describes XSIAM as bringing together capabilities associated with SIEM, XDR, SOAR, attack-surface management and telemetry from endpoint, network, identity, cloud and applications. Those are vendor descriptions of the platform’s scope, not independent evidence that a particular customer will get better detection or lower costs. Palo Alto’s announcement also said eligible customers could receive no-cost migration services through IBM Consulting and other partners.
The strategic logic was to add enterprise security customers to Palo Alto’s Cortex base, increase the reach of its security-operations platform and use IBM’s consulting relationship to help with migrations. Palo Alto later said it expected the acquisition to accelerate Cortex growth, but did not report a clean standalone revenue figure attributable to the acquired QRadar assets. Its fiscal 2025 filing describes the expected growth benefit without isolating QRadar-derived revenue.
Rank #2
- HARDWARE PLUS SECURITY SERVICES: FortiGate-60F Firewall Appliance bundled with 1 year of FortiCare Premium and FortiGuard Unified Threat Protection.
- UNIFIED THREAT PROTECTION (UTP): Secures against advanced online threats with comprehensive web filtering and anti-botnet technologies.
- OPTIMIZED FOR MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES: Tailored for businesses needing robust security without the infrastructure of larger enterprises.
- RELIABLE CUSTOMER SUPPORT: FortiCare Premium ensures high-quality support and service continuity.
- EFFECTIVE PROTECTION: Employs advanced filtering technologies to safeguard against sophisticated threats.
What CEO Nikesh Arora’s adoption figures actually showed
On the November 20, 2024 Q1 FY2025 earnings call, CEO Nikesh Arora described early post-close traction. These are Palo Alto management figures from that call—not 2026 adoption totals or independently audited migration outcomes.
| Figure reported | What it means |
|---|---|
| More than 550 QRadar SaaS customers | Palo Alto said it had added them to its Cortex customer base. The statement does not show that every customer had completed a production migration. |
| More than $80 million in total contract value | Value of QRadar-to-XSIAM transactions, as described by management; TCV is not the same as recognized revenue. |
| More than 500 active customer opportunities | Prospective XSIAM business, not completed sales. |
| More than $1 billion in pipeline value | Management’s pipeline across QRadar SaaS and on-premises customers; pipeline is neither bookings nor revenue. |
| More than half of the relevant installed base outside the United States | A geographic observation that can make migration, support, contracting and data-residency requirements important to customer planning. |
Arora also said Palo Alto believed the deal could help it become one of the top three SIEM players over the coming years. That was management’s ambition, not an established market ranking. All these statements are in the Q1 FY2025 earnings-call transcript.
IBM’s part in the partnership
IBM Consulting was positioned as a migration-services partner for eligible customers. IBM also said it had deployed Cortex XSIAM for next-generation security operations and Prisma SASE 3.0 for zero-trust network security, with coverage intended for more than 250,000 IBM employees. This is evidence of IBM’s own deployment and the companies’ partnership; it is not an independent product test or proof that another organization will achieve the same results. The deployment details appear in the Palo Alto 8-K exhibit.
IBM’s financial interest also matters when evaluating migration proposals: its agreement provides for additional payments in qualifying QRadar on-premises-to-XSIAM migrations. That commercial incentive does not by itself determine whether migration is right for a customer, but it belongs in the context of recommendations from either company.
Rank #3
- 【Up to 1100 Mbps VPN Speed 】 Hardware-accelerated WireGuard and OpenVPN-DCO deliver up to 1100 Mbps VPN throughput, over 3× faster than Brume 2 for smooth remote access and file transfers.
- 【Three 2.5G Ports & Multi-WAN】Tri-port 2.5GbE design with flexible WAN LAN configuration supports multi-gigabit wired setups, dual-ISP Multi-WAN and failover to keep home and SOHO networks online.
- 【Stealth VPN Obfuscation】VPN obfuscation disguises VPN traffic as regular HTTPS, helping you evade blocking, bypass restrictive networks and maintain stable, private connections.
- 【DPI protection】Deep Packet Inspection with visual dashboards blocks adult/gambling/malicious sites, while SQM and QoS prioritize gaming, calls, and video when bandwidth is tight
- 【OpenWrt & USB 3.0 Expansion】OpenWrt with 1GB DDR4 and 8GB eMMC lets you install plugins and build VPN, ad-blocking or NAS, while USB 3.0 Type‑C connects high-speed storage or 4G/5G dongles
What QRadar customers should do after the SaaS lifecycle date
Palo Alto’s policy set August 31, 2026 as the end-of-life date for specified QRadar SaaS products. Because that date has passed, affected customers should promptly establish what support, access, data-export and transition arrangements apply to their precise SKU and contract. The policy does not establish that every subscription ended on the same terms or that every customer has the same remaining access. Get the position in writing from the applicable provider.
- Identify the deployment and exact SKU. Separate QRadar SaaS from on-premises QRadar and list any other IBM security products in use.
- Confirm contract and support status. Ask the provider to identify the governing lifecycle notice, subscription end date, support treatment, data-access window and any transition rights for each SKU.
- Secure data and evidence. Document log retention, legal holds, regulatory requirements and evidence-preservation needs. Confirm export formats, access periods and responsibility for maintaining historical records.
- Inventory content and connections. Record log sources, custom rules and offense logic, reference sets, dashboards, reports, ticketing links, identity and endpoint integrations, and SOAR playbooks.
- Get the migration scope in writing. Confirm which services are eligible for no-cost migration and which redesign, integration, data-retention, consulting or parallel-operation costs are excluded.
- Validate the destination with representative data. Test detection fidelity, search performance, alert volumes, false positives, API and connector coverage, historical-data access, threat hunting and response automation.
- Agree on cutover and recovery controls. Set owners, milestones, acceptance criteria, incident procedures and a rollback or contingency plan before changing production monitoring.
“No-cost migration” should not be assumed to mean that every implementation cost is covered. A complex environment may still incur charges for redesign, integrations, retained historical data, parallel operation or broader consulting. The eligibility and scope should be explicit in the customer’s agreement.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What on-premises QRadar customers should know
The Palo Alto QRadar SaaS end-of-life notice does not apply to IBM QRadar on-premises products. The May 2024 agreement stated that customers choosing to remain on premises would continue to receive IBM features and support, including security, usability and critical bug fixes, connector updates, and the ability to expand consumption. On-premises customers should still verify their current IBM product roadmap, support terms and contract directly with IBM; the acquisition did not transfer that product line to Palo Alto.
On-premises customers may nevertheless be approached about Cortex XSIAM. Their inclusion in the migration opportunity is consistent with the contingent-payment structure, but it does not make migration compulsory under the SaaS sunset notice. Hybrid organizations should treat SaaS and on-premises deployments as separate workstreams.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallRank #4
- Runs UniFi Network for full-stack network management
- Manages 30+ UniFi Network devices and 300+ clients
- 1 Gbps routing with IDS/IPS
- Multi-WAN load balancing
- 0.96" LCM status display
How to assess Cortex XSIAM or another destination
XSIAM may suit organizations seeking to consolidate security-operations tooling, particularly those already using Palo Alto products. It is not simply a drop-in QRadar replacement: data models, analyst workflows, detections and integrations may need redesign or conversion. A buying decision should turn on operational fit and a measured proof of concept, not the acquisition headline or vendor pipeline claims.
Technical and operational checks
- Can the platform reproduce priority QRadar detections with acceptable fidelity?
- Do representative searches, investigations and threat-hunting workflows meet analyst needs?
- Are required log sources, APIs, ticketing systems, identity services and response tools supported?
- What happens to historical data, custom content, compliance reports and incident evidence?
- How will the SOC handle retraining, alert-volume changes, false positives and escalation?
- Does the organization want a consolidated platform, or does it prefer a best-of-breed SIEM and separate tools?
Commercial and governance checks
- Compare data-ingestion and telemetry charges, endpoint or user licensing, services, contract term and renewal protections.
- Model the cost of running QRadar and a replacement in parallel, including any continued access or retention charges.
- Check regional data-residency, support, tax and contracting requirements, especially for multinational operations.
- Assess vendor concentration, portability and the organization’s tolerance for dependence on a single security platform.
- Ask whether migration assistance covers only defined services or also the organization’s actual conversion and operating needs.
Organizations unwilling or unable to move to XSIAM can evaluate IBM QRadar on-premises where appropriate, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Google Security Operations, or a managed detection and response service. Each has different operating and commercial models; this is not a tested ranking. Buyers should compare candidates against the same use cases, data, retention obligations, integration list and total-cost assumptions.
What the transaction means for investors
For Palo Alto, the deal offered a route to a large enterprise customer population and a potential accelerator for Cortex, but the company has not separately disclosed QRadar-attributable revenue in the cited fiscal 2025 filing. The November 2024 customer, TCV and pipeline figures therefore illuminate early commercial activity without proving later conversion, retention or profitability.
For IBM, the transaction brought initial cash proceeds and a closing gain, while leaving the on-premises QRadar line with IBM. Contingent migration payments mean the economics extended beyond the closing payment. For customers, the practical question is different from either company’s growth story: whether the chosen security platform can preserve required detections, integrations, historical access and operational continuity at an acceptable cost.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
