In 2016, the Federal Court made 10-year orders against Jamie and Dennis McIntyre after declaring five land-banking developments to be unregistered managed investment schemes. The stated period reaches its October 2026 endpoint, but the sources cited here do not establish whether the orders were later changed or confirm current register entries. Separately, claims about Australian National Review (ANR) and its investment content have appeared in third-party reporting; ASIC’s official materials do not establish ANR’s ownership or editorial practices. For readers, the practical distinction is between documented court findings and claims that still need independent verification.
What did ASIC report the Federal Court ordered?
ASIC reported that on 17 October 2016 the Federal Court declared five land-banking developments operated by Jamie and Dennis McIntyre to be unregistered managed investment schemes. The Court ordered the schemes wound up and appointed Deloitte liquidators. It also disqualified both men from managing corporations and restrained them from carrying on financial services for 10 years; ASIC said they agreed to the banning orders. ASIC’s 20 October 2016 release names the schemes:
- Botanica
- Secret Valley Estate
- Oak Valley Lakes Estate & Resort
- Bendigo Vineyard Estate & Resort
- Melbourne Grove Estate
ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer said the lengthy banning periods were necessary “to protect the public from those who are officers of companies that repeatedly contravene the Corporations Act.” The orders concerned corporate management and financial services; they should not be generalized into a claim that every later statement or activity by either man was unlawful.
Is the 10-year ban still in force?
The period reported in 2016 reaches its stated endpoint in October 2026. That date alone does not establish current legal status: the cited release does not say whether the orders were later varied or extended, and it does not confirm what the live register currently shows. Check ASIC’s banned and disqualified people guidance and its linked live registers for current entries. If the legal effect of an order matters to a decision, consult the court record or obtain qualified legal advice. Expiry of the stated period would not undo the historical findings or prove that earlier conduct was lawful.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
ASIC’s release also reproduces Justice Bromwich’s warning that a breach of the orders and injunctions “will be likely to be treated as a very serious contempt of this Court, with a high risk of imprisonment.” That statement described the possible consequences of breaching the orders; it is not evidence that a later breach occurred. ASIC said the warning included online activity holding either man out as carrying on a financial services business or providing financial product advice. The release quotes the reasons in ASIC v McIntyre [2016] FCA 1276.
How the separate Pilbara matter differs
Another Federal Court matter reported by ASIC in March 2016 concerned a proposed Pilbara property investment marketed by Macro Realty Developments. It is distinct from the later ruling on the five land-banking schemes. ASIC said the Court permanently restrained marketing of the proposal and declared certain marketing by Macro Realty Developments, 21st Century Property and 21st Century Education misleading or deceptive. The claims identified by ASIC included that the proposal was essentially risk-free, required no money or capital, and involved no fees. ASIC also reported that financial product advice was provided without the relevant entities being licensed. ASIC’s 24 March 2016 release describes that proceeding.
Rank #2
These findings make absolute assurances such as “risk-free,” “no capital” or “no fees” worth checking carefully when they appear in an investment pitch. They do not, by themselves, establish that any particular later offer makes the same claims or is unlawful.
What is established about Australian National Review?
A 23 March 2026 Australian National News article asserts that ANR is associated with Jamie McIntyre and that its content has promoted investment opportunities. Those are claims by that publisher, not findings established by the ASIC materials cited above. The official materials do not establish ANR’s ownership, editorial practices or current content. The Australian National News article can be read as a source for what that publisher alleges, but the assertions should not be presented as independently verified facts without corroboration from primary documents, ANR disclosures or reliable independent reporting.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchRank #3
That distinction cuts both ways: the available official material does not prove that ANR as a whole is false, unsafe or unlawful, either. Assess a specific article or offer on its evidence and disclosures rather than assuming the outlet’s name or association settles the question.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to check an investment claim or promoter
ASIC advises consumers to check its registers before investing, seeking financial advice or taking on credit. Its consumer guidance points to the banned and disqualified register and other licensing and warning registers. Use a register check alongside document review; no single check answers every question about an investment.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Set of 4 Life of Fred books teaching Language Arts Skills, Middle School
- Hardcover books include end of chapter questions and answers
- Fun engaging stories teach language arts skills in a creative way!
- Identify the exact entity and people. Record the legal name of the issuer, promoter, adviser and any company receiving funds. A trading name or a person mentioned in an article may not be the contracting entity.
- Check the relevant ASIC registers. Look for the entity or person in the licensing, banned and disqualified, and warning registers relevant to the activity being offered. Match names carefully and check the date and scope of any entry. A clean search result should not be treated as proof that an offer is sound.
- Read the investment documents. Establish the legal structure, what you would own or be entitled to, how money is held, who controls assets and decisions, and what happens if the project fails. Check fees, risks, withdrawal terms and any conditions against the promotion.
- Trace the evidence behind the pitch. Separate verifiable facts from forecasts, opinion and promotional language. For material legal or financial claims, look for the underlying court order, regulator statement, company disclosure or other primary document.
- Check the article’s role and incentives. Identify the author, date and source for key claims. Determine whether the piece is reporting, opinion or a promotion, whether it links to an investment offer, and whether commercial interests are disclosed.
- Pause when the central terms remain unclear. If you cannot verify the legal entity, licensing status, fees, risks or control of funds, do not rely on a news article or sales presentation as a substitute for independent advice.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
