Georgia and Walker “Patterson” Inman III were 15 when a 2013 Rolling Stone profile described them as heirs to the Doris Duke fortune and recounted their allegations of abuse and neglect. The often-repeated estimate that they might inherit $1 billion was a claim about a possible future inheritance—not a verified account of what they received or what they are worth today.
Who were the Inman twins?
Georgia and Walker “Patterson” Inman III are Doris Duke’s great-niece and great-nephew through their father, Walker Inman Jr. Rolling Stone profiled them as teenagers in August 2013; ABC News also reported that they were 15 at the time. The story brought together two very different facts about their circumstances: a family connection to substantial inherited wealth and the twins’ accounts of a troubled childhood.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Silver Swan | $11.59 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Too Rich: The Family Secrets of Doris Duke | $14.97 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
The Richest Girl In The World - The Extravagant Life And Fast Times Of Doris Duke | $50.47 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Trust No One : The Glamorous Life and Bizarre Death of Doris Duke | $9.51 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Homicide at Rough Point | $18.50 | Buy on Amazon |
The original Rolling Stone feature is the direct source for its interviews and descriptions. Longform’s archive listing identifies the piece and dates its listing August 13, 2013.
What did the $1 billion inheritance estimate mean?
In 2013 coverage, the twins were described as expected to inherit an estimated $1 billion at age 21. The figure should be read as a contemporaneous estimate, not as a confirmed trust balance, a record of distributions, or a statement of present-day net worth. In the Rolling Stone story, the prospect of a future inheritance is presented as a family claim. ABC News reported the estimate on August 2, 2013, and Paramount Press Express repeated it in a January 30, 2014 announcement about the twins’ planned Dr. Phil interview.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
Those reports establish that the estimate was publicly circulated; they do not establish what the twins ultimately inherited. The sources available for the 2013–14 coverage do not verify their current financial position, trust terms, trustee, or distributions.
What was reported about their childhood?
The twins told Rolling Stone about experiences they characterized as abuse and neglect. The article describes those allegations and the family circumstances around them, but allegations in an interview or news report are not the same as findings by a court. No court or regulator statement resolving the reported allegations is identified in the contemporaneous sources cited here.
Rank #2
Georgia told Rolling Stone, “People can look at this as a blessing all day long, but it’s blood money.” That remark captures the tension at the center of the profile: inherited wealth can shape a family’s resources and public attention, but it does not by itself establish a safe or stable childhood. ABC News quoted child psychologist Jamie M. Howard making a related point: “Absolutely, money does not protect you from abuse.”
How did Doris Duke’s fortune enter the story?
Doris Duke’s wealth was tied to the Duke family tobacco fortune. ABC News reported that she inherited $100 million in 1947 and later became known for philanthropy. Her great-niece and great-nephew’s connection to that fortune is the basis for the heir label used in contemporary coverage; it does not, by itself, verify the amount either twin received.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsTheir father, Walker Inman Jr., died in 2010, according to ABC News and Paramount’s announcement. ABC also reported an estimated monthly inheritance of $90,000 for him. That was a reported estimate about their father, not evidence of a monthly payment to the twins.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the historical sources establish—and what they do not
| Source | Date and type | What it supports | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Stone | August 2013; original feature | The twins’ accounts as reported in interviews, their age at the time, and the way the possible inheritance was framed as a family claim. | A judicial determination of the allegations or a verified present-day account of wealth. |
| ABC News | August 2, 2013; contemporaneous news report | The reported ages, inheritance estimates, Doris Duke’s 1947 inheritance, and Walker Inman Jr.’s 2010 death. | Proof of the twins’ eventual distributions or current financial position. |
| Paramount Press Express | January 30, 2014; broadcaster announcement | That Dr. Phil announced an interview and repeated the estimate and allegations as part of its description. | Independent verification of the family’s finances or resolution of the allegations. |
The historical reporting makes the title’s contrast understandable, but it cannot answer present-day questions about the twins’ lives or finances. Claims about current wealth, inheritance terms, or legal outcomes require current, reliable documentation rather than repetition of a decade-old estimate.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
