Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsThere is no confirmed public total for how much Tiger Woods personally lost because of the 2009 infidelity scandal. Contemporary reports put his annual endorsement income at roughly $100 million to $110 million, but that estimate is not a calculation of lost income. A widely repeated estimate of $5 billion to $12 billion refers instead to shareholder losses at sponsor companies—not Woods’s personal finances.
What can be said about Woods’s personal financial loss?
The available figures do not establish a verified dollar amount for Woods’s personal losses caused by the scandal. CBS News reported a contemporary estimate of about $110 million a year in endorsements, including estimates of $30 million annually from Nike, $5 million from Gillette, and $24 million from EA Sports. These were media estimates of income around that period, not confirmed payments and not a before-and-after accounting of what Woods lost. CBS News, 2009.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Tiger Woods | $11.21 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Tiger Woods Biography: The Story of Golf Legend | $13.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Tiger: A Biography of Tiger Woods | $18.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
TIGER WOODS: The Inspiring Journey of a Golf Legend ( A Biography Book for Kids) | $15.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Tiger, Tiger: His Life, As It’s Never Been Told Before | $15.29 | Buy on Amazon |
Annual endorsement income and losses are different measures. To calculate a personal loss, one would need reliable information about the value and duration of each contract, what Woods would have earned without the scandal, and the income he actually received afterward. The cited figures do not provide that comparison.
Which sponsors ended or changed their arrangements?
Companies took different actions in late 2009. Ending a contract, limiting advertising, and discontinuing a product are not interchangeable—and the contemporaneous reports do not establish that every change was caused by the scandal.
#1 Best Overall
| Company | Reported action at the time | What the reporting establishes |
|---|---|---|
| Accenture | Ended its agreement with Woods in December 2009. | The Los Angeles Times reported it was the first sponsor to cut ties completely. The company said Woods was no longer the right representative for its advertising. Los Angeles Times, December 14, 2009. |
| AT&T | Announced it was ending its sponsorship agreement on December 31, 2009. | AT&T said, “We are ending our sponsorship agreement with Tiger Woods and wish him well in the future.” The Guardian, December 31, 2009. |
| Gillette | Limited or paused Woods’s marketing role while he was away from public life. | Contemporary accounts described a reduced role, not an immediate contract termination. Los Angeles Times, December 14, 2009; The Guardian, December 31, 2009. |
| Tag Heuer | Was reported as planning to scale down Woods’s presence in advertisements. | The report describes reduced advertising visibility, not a confirmed termination. The Guardian, December 31, 2009. |
| Gatorade | Discontinued the Gatorade Tiger Focus drink. | The Guardian reported that PepsiCo said the product decision had nothing to do with the scandal, so it should not be counted as a confirmed scandal-caused sponsor termination. The Guardian, December 31, 2009. |
| Nike | Expressed support for Woods. | Contemporary reporting described support during the immediate fallout, rather than an exit. Los Angeles Times, December 14, 2009. |
| EA Sports | Was reported as keeping its Tiger Woods PGA Tour game arrangement unchanged at that point. | This describes the immediate aftermath reported in 2009, not a complete history of the relationship. The Guardian, December 31, 2009. |
What does the $5 billion to $12 billion figure mean?
It is an estimate of collective shareholder losses at sponsor companies, not money taken from Woods’s accounts or a measure of his personal lost earnings. Economists Christopher Knittel and Victor Stango estimated that sponsor-company shareholders lost between $5 billion and $12 billion over the 13 trading days from November 27 to December 17, 2009. The University of California, Davis described the study on December 28, 2009. UC Davis, December 28, 2009.
Stango, a co-author of the study, said, “Total shareholder losses may exceed several decades’ worth of Tiger Woods’ personal endorsement income.” That comparison underscores the scale of the estimated market impact; it does not turn the shareholder-loss estimate into Woods’s personal loss.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to interpret claims about his “fortune”
- About $100 million to $110 million annually: a contemporary estimate of endorsement income around the scandal, not a verified loss figure.
- Accenture and AT&T: reported contract endings; these are the clearest examples in the cited coverage of sponsors ending agreements.
- Reduced marketing roles: Gillette and Tag Heuer were reported as limiting or scaling back advertising use, which is distinct from a confirmed immediate termination.
- $5 billion to $12 billion: an estimate of sponsor-company shareholder losses across a defined 13-trading-day window, not Woods’s personal finances.
The sponsor accounts above are snapshots from December 2009, not a complete history of Woods’s later commercial relationships. They also do not add up to a defensible total of money he personally lost.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
