Arkady Bukh’s reputation as a defense lawyer for people accused of cross-border cybercrime grew through a combination of Russian-language fluency, experience with international cases and a steady stream of referrals from clients and lawyers. A 2020 CyberScoop profile by Jeff Stone documented that network through cases involving defendants accused of carding, spam and other cybercrime-related conduct. “Go-to” describes the reputation conveyed by those examples and sources—not an independently measured ranking.
Who is Arkady Bukh?
Bukh is a New York criminal defense lawyer whose practice has included federal cases, extradition and cybercrime matters. His firm biography says he was born in Russia, moved with his family to Israel as a child, and relocated to New York in 1992. Those biographical details come from the firm itself; the account of how he built a niche comes primarily from Stone’s 2020 reporting.
CyberScoop describes Bukh’s early practice as serving immigrant communities and says he began representing people accused of cybercrime early in his career. Russian-language fluency, a computer background and repeated work on international matters helped distinguish him in cases where defendants, alleged conduct and investigations crossed national borders. Bukh’s current firm biography continues to advertise federal criminal defense, extradition and cybercrime work, but that establishes what the firm offers—not whether his reputation or caseload has remained the same since 2020.
How did Bukh become a referral point?
His profile developed through accumulated case experience and word of mouth rather than a formal designation. CyberScoop reported that Bukh had defended dozens of people accused of cybercrime over a ten-year span, a journalistic characterization rather than an audited client count. The publication also said that Bukh & Associates was involved in at least five major U.S. cybercrime cases in 2019.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
Referrals helped turn experience into visibility. Stone describes former clients and intermediaries directing new defendants to Bukh, while other defense lawyers brought him into matters. Chicago attorney Vadim Glozman, who had worked with Bukh on several cases, called him “the godfather of cybercriminal defense lawyers.” Glozman also said Bukh had handled more such cases than anyone in the country; that is one lawyer’s assessment, not a verified comparison across the profession.
Bukh described his clients in his own terms: “In 100% of my cases, they are businessmen.” That statement reflects his characterization, not an independently established statistic or a finding about the conduct alleged in any particular case.
Rank #2
What cases shaped his reputation?
The cases reported by CyberScoop span different allegations, countries and procedural outcomes. Being represented by Bukh does not establish that a person committed an offense; the status of each matter matters.
| Client | Reported connection or allegation | Procedural status and Bukh’s role |
|---|---|---|
| Aleksi Kolarov | Accused in connection with ShadowCrew. | CyberScoop recounts Bukh’s representation. The profile does not establish a comparable plea or sentence outcome for Kolarov. |
| Vladislav Horohorin | A figure associated with CarderPlanet. He admitted trafficking more than 2.5 million credit and debit card numbers and using some data to withdraw more than $9 million from international accounts, according to the case account in CyberScoop. | Horohorin pleaded guilty to federal offenses and received a seven-year sentence. Bukh represented him. |
| Oleg Nikolaenko | Associated with the Mega-D spam operation. | CyberScoop describes Bukh’s representation; the profile’s account does not make his status or outcome equivalent to Horohorin’s plea and sentence. |
| Sergey Pavlovich | Concerned about potential U.S. exposure and travel. | The profile says those concerns prompted a referral to Bukh. It does not present the matter as a conviction. |
| Yevgeniy Nikulin | A case involving extradition to the United States and trial proceedings. | Bukh represented Nikulin, then sought to withdraw from the case. The profile does not treat the representation as proof of an outcome for Nikulin. |
The range of matters helps explain why Bukh attracted referrals: they involved not only allegations of online conduct but also the practical complications of international investigations, extradition and U.S. criminal proceedings. The 2020 profile does not establish later outcomes for every person it discusses.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Rank #3
What did CyberSec have to do with the story?
CyberScoop reported Bukh’s account that some clients paid through contributions to a consultancy called CyberSec rather than in cash. The profile said former clients including Igor Klopov and Oleg Nikolaenko were involved, but described uncertainty about what the venture actually did. Horohorin denied being a member. The available account therefore does not support describing CyberSec as an established, functioning cybersecurity company or treating the reported client connections as proof of wrongdoing.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What can—and can’t—be concluded about his standing?
The strongest basis for calling Bukh a referral point is the combination of reported repeat work, referrals and Glozman’s praise in Stone’s 2020 profile. It is evidence of a reputation within the circle described by that reporting, not a neutral ranking or a complete accounting of his cases. His firm’s present-day practice descriptions show that it still advertises work in relevant areas; they do not independently verify that he is the leading or most experienced lawyer in the field.
Rank #4
Bukh once joked that when he began in cybercrime, “I don’t know, 50 years ago,” colleagues saw him as unusual. The remark is plainly hyperbolic, not a literal career timeline. The more supportable explanation is less dramatic: a lawyer with language and computer skills developed experience in cross-border defense matters, and that experience generated referrals that brought additional cases and attention.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Used Book in Good Condition
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
