The Telangana Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) reportedly allowed input tax credit (ITC) on expenses attributable to a company’s fresh issue of shares where the proceeds are used in the course or furtherance of its business. It denied ITC on expenses attributable to existing shareholders’ offer for sale (OFS), since those sale proceeds go to the shareholders. The distinction makes expense attribution and the use of proceeds central; it does not make every IPO cost eligible.
Why the fresh issue and offer for sale are treated differently
An IPO can combine a fresh issue of new shares with an OFS of existing shares. The company receives the fresh-issue proceeds, while selling shareholders receive the OFS proceeds. In its reported reasoning, the Telangana AAR treated costs according to the part of the transaction they supported and whether the company’s proceeds served its business.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
| IPO component | Who receives the proceeds? | Reported ITC treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh issue | The company | ITC may be available for attributable expenses if the proceeds are used in furtherance of the company’s business and applicable ITC conditions are met. |
| Offer for sale | Existing shareholders selling their shares | ITC was denied for expenses attributable to the OFS because the proceeds accrue to shareholders, not the company. |
This is a fact-specific advance ruling concerning Sai Silks Kalamandir Limited, not a blanket rule for all IPOs. The reported decision should not be treated as a universal court precedent.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →What the company said it would do with the fresh-issue proceeds
TaxGuru’s reproduction of the case reports that expenses attributed to the fresh issue were estimated at approximately ₹33.763 crore. It also reports proposed uses of the net proceeds that included establishing 30 stores and two warehouses, meeting working-capital requirements, repaying borrowings, and general corporate purposes. These are reported figures and plans for this applicant’s case, not benchmarks for other companies.
#1 Best Overall
The reported outcome links fresh-issue ITC to the company’s business use of the proceeds. The proposed deployment helps explain the business-purpose question in this case; it should not be read as an independent guarantee that any particular expense qualifies.
How the ruling relates to the GST input-credit test
Section 16(1) of the CGST Act permits ITC on goods or services used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to the Act’s conditions. The case summary describes IPO-related services as potentially supporting business by enabling capital raising for expansion, working capital, debt repayment, or other corporate purposes. It also reports that IPO expenses are not themselves a category specifically blocked under section 17(5).
Rank #2
That reasoning does not dispense with the other statutory requirements for ITC, establish that every IPO service has the necessary business connection, or resolve how a particular company should apportion shared costs. The reported holding is conditional on the fresh-issue business purpose and the applicable credit conditions.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What a company with a combined issue can take from the decision
For a combined fresh issue and OFS, the practical task is to connect each claimed expense to the relevant component and, for fresh-issue costs, to the business deployment of the company’s proceeds. The reported distinction does not prescribe a particular allocation formula. Companies should retain records supporting their attribution rather than treating all IPO costs as a single eligible pool.
- Identify whether the expense relates to the company’s issue of new shares, shareholders’ sale of existing shares, or both.
- For expenses claimed against the fresh issue, document how the company’s net proceeds are intended to be used in its business.
- Support any allocation of shared expenses with records. This is a practical implication of the ruling’s distinction, not a separately reported prescribed method.
- Assess the remaining statutory conditions for the specific credit claim; the AAR’s reported conclusion does not establish that those requirements are automatically satisfied.
Limits on what can be concluded
The available case summary and secondary reproduction identify the applicant and the split treatment, but the complete signed order was not available in the material reviewed for this article. The order identifier, date, and current appellate status have not been verified here. Accordingly, the ruling’s reported conclusion should be attributed to the Telangana AAR and not presented as a confirmed statement of its present appellate status or as binding authority for every taxpayer.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
