Five states—Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka—are reported to form a non-rotating core of a proposed new GST standing committee. The plan is not confirmed as adopted: reports published on October 5 and 6, 2026 differ on whether any state would hold a permanent seat, and no official decision record was identified.
Which states are named, and what does “permanent” mean?
BusinessToday reported on October 6, 2026, that the proposed committee would have 12 state representatives: five core positions for Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka that would not rotate, plus seven positions rotating every two years. That supports describing the five as proposed non-rotating representatives—not saying they have secured permanent seats.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The same report gave these additional state groupings for the first two-year cycle:
Recommended Free Tools
- Rajasthan and West Bengal
- Kerala and Punjab
- Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Meghalaya
The groupings name seven states, but the reports do not establish a complete official roster or identify all individual committee members. The reported design concerns state representation, not necessarily named officeholders.
#1 Best Overall
Why reports disagree about permanent representation
Economic Times BFSI, reporting on October 5, 2026, characterized the proposal as a committee whose membership would rotate every two years, with no state holding a permanent seat. BusinessToday’s account the next day instead describes five non-rotating core positions alongside seven rotating ones. The distinction could be between a fixed core and rotating seats, but the reports alone do not establish that as the official design.
Both accounts describe a proposal, not an implemented arrangement. The available reporting did not identify a government order, a GST Council decision record, or another official confirmation of approval. Treat the membership and rotation details as reported plans unless an official record confirms them.
How the proposed state grouping would be determined
BusinessToday reported that the proposed grouping uses two indicators of a state’s size in the GST system: post-settlement gross SGST revenue for FY2025-26 and registered GSTIN counts as of March 31, 2026. The report does not provide the figures or explain how the indicators would be weighted. It is therefore not possible to calculate a state ranking or independently infer why each state was assigned to a particular group.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteWhat the proposed committee would do
Reports describe a remit covering proposals to amend GST laws, rules, notifications and forms; simplify procedures; and consider trade and industry representations. These are proposed responsibilities, not confirmed operating procedures.
The reported plan also includes a centralised GST Council Secretariat process for receiving, screening, categorising and tracking representations. Similar issues could be grouped together, with wider policy or systemic concerns prioritised for referral to the appropriate committee. Whether and how that process will operate depends on the proposal’s formal status and final terms.
How this differs from earlier GST Council committees
The GST Council’s record of its 14th meeting describes an earlier proposal for eight standing committees covering different aspects of the GST project. Each was to have two convenors—one from the Centre and one from a state—and identify action steps, a blueprint and timelines. That is historical context; it does not confirm that the proposed 2026 structure has been approved or that the earlier arrangement is being replaced.
Rank #4
What taxpayers and businesses should take from the proposal
For businesses, the reported remit suggests a possible channel for trade and industry concerns and a committee process for considering GST rule or procedure changes. It does not, by itself, change tax rates, compliance duties or filing requirements. Those changes require formal action through the relevant GST Council and government processes.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →For now, the clearest reading is that five states are reported to have proposed non-rotating core representation, while seven other state positions would rotate every two years. The competing account that no state would have a permanent seat, and the absence of an identified official decision record, mean the arrangement should not be treated as settled.
Quick Recap
Sources
- BusinessToday, “GST Council moves to simplify officers’ committee structure,” October 6, 2026.
- Economic Times BFSI, “Tax Officers’ Committees: GST Council Proposes Major Overhaul of Tax Officers’ Panels,” October 5, 2026.
- GST Council, “14th GST Council Meeting.”
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
