Google’s payments to Apple have not been banned. In the U.S. search-monopoly case, the district court rejected the government’s proposed blanket ban and allowed Google to pay browser developers such as Apple for default search placement, subject to conditions. The arrangement remains exposed to compliance scrutiny and appeals, so the ruling is not a guarantee that the deal will continue unchanged.
What the lawsuit is—and what it is not
The case is United States and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC, a federal antitrust action filed in 2020 over Google’s general-search and search-advertising businesses. The government argued that Google used distribution agreements, including its agreement with Apple, to protect its position as the default search engine. It is not the separate DOJ antitrust lawsuit against Apple.
The Justice Department’s case page tracks the Google search case and its filings. The separate DOJ case against Apple is a different proceeding.
How much money is at stake?
A D.C. Circuit opinion disclosed that Google paid Apple approximately $20 billion in 2022 under the arrangement associated with Google’s default position in Safari. That is a court-record figure for 2022, not a verified 2026 annual payment or a promise that the amount recurs at the same level each year. The appellate court’s discussion is available in its opinion concerning the Apple agreement.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches#1 Best Overall
- Attention-grabbing design meets the latest evolution of the Google Pixel Camera on the new Google Pixel 11 Pro; Gemini Intelligence helps manage details so you can live in the moment[1]; and the phone is available in two sizes
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan: Works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers[2]
- Stay informed without looking at your screen: When your phone is face down, Pixel HiLight gently alerts you with subtle glowing lights when your favorite contacts are calling or you’re talking with Gemini; exclusive to Google Pixel 11 Pro phones
- Magic Capture catches the moment as you live it: With just one tap, Pixel 11 Pro captures video and photos, and automatically edits, crops, and unblurs a curated collection, ready to share – and you get the memory of how it felt to be in the moment
- Two new cameras for more brilliant photos: A larger telephoto sensor captures 30% more light for clear, beautiful photos and videos, even in the dark[3]; Pixel’s longest zoom ever helps you capture details from impressive distances[4]
Evidence in the litigation also disclosed a 36% share of relevant Google search-advertising revenue generated through Safari. That figure comes from court proceedings; it should not be treated as a confirmed current contract rate. The case record provides context for the agreement and the government’s allegations.
These figures show why the arrangement matters to Apple, but they do not establish how much Apple would lose if the terms changed. The public figures cited here do not establish a current annual payment, and the $20 billion figure should not be read as Apple’s net profit from the agreement.
Why the government challenged the Apple arrangement
The government’s concern was not simply that Google paid a large sum. Its theory was that default placement gave Google prominent access to users and helped reinforce a cycle: scale generated search revenue, revenue financed payments for distribution, and default distribution made it harder for rivals to build comparable reach, data, and advertising businesses. The government described this theory in its original complaint and later remedies announcement.
Rank #2
- Google Pixel 10a is a durable, everyday phone with more[1]; snap brilliant photography on a simple, powerful camera, get 30+ hours out of a full charge[2], and do more with helpful AI like Gemini[3]
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan; it works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Pixel 10a is sleek and durable, with a super smooth finish, scratch-resistant Corning Gorilla Glass 7i display, and IP68 water and dust protection[4]
- The Actua display with 3,000-nit peak brightness shows up clear as day, even in direct sunlight[5]
- Plan, create, and get more done with help from Gemini, your built-in AI assistant[3]; have it screen spam calls while you focus[6]; chat with Gemini to brainstorm your meal plan[7], or bring your ideas to life with Nano Banana[8]
- Default placement: Google is preselected when a user starts a search in Safari.
- Exclusivity: Contract terms may limit a partner’s ability to distribute or promote competing products.
- Revenue sharing: A partner receives money linked to Google search activity.
- User choice: A person may be able to change the default, but the ease and visibility of that choice affect how meaningful it is in practice.
The government treated these features as interconnected. Google’s defense was that Apple chose Google because of the quality of its search product and that the agreement reflected competition for distribution. The court’s task was not simply to decide whether Google was popular; it was to assess whether the agreements unlawfully preserved monopoly power by foreclosing rivals.
What the court decided—and when
August 2024: liability
After a nine-week bench trial that began in September 2023, Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August 2024 that Google unlawfully maintained monopolies in relevant search markets. The ruling addressed Google’s conduct and liability; it did not, by itself, dictate that every challenged payment must stop. The DOJ summarized the liability decision and the later remedies process in its remedies announcement.
2025: proposed ban versus final remedy
The government sought a broad restriction on search-related payments to distributors for preferential treatment or default placement, including payments to Apple. That was a proposed remedy, not the judgment the court ultimately entered. The proposed language appears in the government’s proposed final judgment and its supporting exhibits.
Following the remedies trial in May 2025, the district court entered its final judgment on December 5, 2025. It restricted certain exclusive distribution agreements and imposed measures intended to help competitors, including data-sharing and search-syndication requirements. But it did not categorically prohibit Google from paying Apple for default placement.
Under the judgment, Google may not condition revenue-sharing payments on maintaining Google Search or related products for more than one year, or on restricting partners from simultaneously distributing rival search engines, browsers, or generative-AI products. The final judgment sets out the restrictions. The court’s remedies opinion also describes flexibility for browser developers such as Apple, including opportunities to promote rivals, use different search engines in different settings or operating-system versions, and change defaults annually.
What the remedy means for Google and Apple
| Question | What the district court’s judgment provides |
|---|---|
| Can Google pay Apple for default placement? | Yes, subject to the judgment’s conditions. |
| Can the agreement require exclusive distribution? | The judgment restricts certain exclusive arrangements and payment conditions. |
| Must competing products have opportunities? | The remedy is designed to preserve opportunities for rival distribution and promotion. |
| Can Apple change or vary defaults? | The remedies opinion describes annual changes and context-specific flexibility, including different settings or operating-system versions. |
| Is the arrangement immune from further challenge? | No. Appeals and compliance obligations remain. |
The court did not conclude that Google’s payments were harmless. It chose narrower behavioral restrictions over a blanket prohibition, in part because a broad ban could harm device makers, carriers, and browser developers that rely on distribution payments without necessarily creating a better competitive market. The Congressional Research Service summarized the court’s concern: counterparties might have to keep Google as the default without compensation or accept less lucrative arrangements with rivals.
Rank #4
- Google Pixel 10 Pro is the ultimate Pixel experience, featuring advanced AI with Gemini, unbelievable camera quality, impeccable design in two sizes, and the next-gen Google Tensor G5 chip[1]
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan[2]; it works - Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Get a head start on syncing your data before it even arrives: After you purchase your new Pixel, look for an email that explains how to transfer your photos, videos, passwords, and more in just a few quick steps[11]
- Pixel’s pro camera system makes everything look amazing, even in low light; capture more of the scene with advanced Google AI models, and bring out incredible details with 100x Pro Res Zoom, stunning 50 MP images, and super steady videos in 8K[10]
- Pixel 10 Pro is built with durable aluminum and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for scratch and drop resistance; the 6.3-inch Super Actua display with 3,300-nit peak brightness is easy on the eyes, even in direct sunlight[3,13,18]
The treatment of Apple should not be generalized to every distributor. The remedies opinion expressly discussed browser developers such as Apple and the conditions under which payments for default placement could continue.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why the deal remains at risk
Appeals could change the rules
The United States and plaintiff states are challenging aspects of the outcome, and Google is also pursuing appellate relief. As of August 18, 2026, the DOJ case page listed appellate briefing through July 28, 2026, including response and cross-appeal materials. The DOJ appellate-brief index and case docket show that proceedings remain active. An appeals court could change the remedy; the existence of an appeal does not mean a payment ban is certain.
Compliance depends on how the agreement works
Permission to pay is not permission to recreate prohibited exclusivity through contract language or practical barriers. The arrangement must comply with restrictions on payment conditions and preserve the competitive opportunities the judgment requires. A nominal right to switch defaults would be less meaningful if Apple could not realistically promote alternatives or exercise the flexibility described by the court.
Best Value
- Google Pixel 7 is powered by Google Tensor G2; it’s faster, more efficient, and more secure, with the best photo and video quality yet on Pixel[1].Other camera description:Front,Rear.Bluetooth Version 5.2 with dual antennas for enhanced quality and connection.
- Unlocked Android 5G phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan[2]; works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Pixel’s Adaptive Battery can last over 24 hours; when Extreme Battery Saver is turned on, it can last up to 72 hours[3]
- The 6.3-inch Pixel 7 display is super sharp, with rich, vivid colors; it’s fast and responsive for smoother gaming, scrolling, and moving between apps[4]
- Google Pixel 7 has wide and ultrawide lenses with up to 8x Super Res Zoom[5]; and Cinematic Blur brings more drama to your videos
Apple may have more leverage to renegotiate
The judgment may give Apple greater room to consider rival search engines, vary defaults, or seek different terms. That could affect its bargaining position with Google, but the court’s ruling does not establish that Apple will switch providers, demand a particular amount, or end the relationship.
What users might notice
A change to the payment rules would not automatically remove Google from iPhones, iPads, or Macs. Possible outcomes include Google remaining Safari’s default under revised terms, Apple choosing another default, or users seeing more prominent choice or different defaults by region, operating-system version, or browsing mode. Rival engines—including Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Ecosia—could gain access or visibility if Apple chooses to promote them, but that outcome is not guaranteed.
The key practical question is whether alternatives are genuinely easy to find and select. A settings option alone does not show how much user choice exists: the placement of alternatives during setup, the steps needed to switch, Apple’s ability to change defaults annually, and rivals’ ability to promote their services all matter.
Quick Recap
What to watch next
- Appellate rulings: Whether the court of appeals leaves the conditions in place, narrows them, or requires stronger restrictions.
- Compliance: Whether Google’s contracts and Apple’s distribution practices provide the flexibility and rival access the judgment requires.
- Commercial terms: Whether Apple and Google renegotiate the arrangement, without assuming that any change means the payments end.
- Real-world choice: Whether users can readily select alternatives and whether competing services can reach Safari users on meaningful terms.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →
