Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchA civil lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida alleges that a Florida-based family office and several associated defendants sought large upfront payments in connection with credit facilities that never materialized. The allegations have not been established in court. The reports identify the case as 0:25-cv-62520, filed December 5, 2025; the available reporting does not verify what has happened in the case since mid-December 2025.
What the lawsuit alleges
According to reports by TechBullion and ArtDaily, Nevada investor Kristopher Mullins and KCM Investments LLC claim that Justin Godur offered access to substantial credit facilities during real-estate financing discussions and requested upfront payments for due diligence, applications, or related services. The plaintiffs reportedly say the proposed financing did not arrive.
The articles describe several disputed transactions. Amounts below are claims attributed to the plaintiffs in those reports, not verified losses or court findings.
| Reported proposal | Upfront payment described in reporting | What the plaintiffs reportedly say |
|---|---|---|
| Construction facility of $150 million | $125,000, reportedly paid in December 2023 | The facility did not materialize. |
| Personal facility of $500 million | $155,000, reportedly paid in January 2024 | The facility did not materialize. |
| Domestic line of $100 million | $150,000 in installments, reportedly paid in March and April 2024 | The line did not materialize. The reports say that in November 2024 Godur stated the payment had not been forwarded or applied for. |
The reports also describe other disputed payments or promises: $50,000 for what was called lender insurance; $25,000 related to general-contractor-license qualification, of which ArtDaily says $10,000 was later refunded; and an alleged $100,000 promise tied to a Las Vegas hotel equity deal. TechBullion additionally reports an alleged partnership document in April 2024 and a job offer in May 2024. These accounts have not been independently checked against the complaint or docket. The reported figures should not be added together and presented as a verified total.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
Who is named, and what claims are reported?
The reports identify Mullins and KCM Investments LLC as plaintiffs. They name Justin Godur, his father Morris Jaime Godur, Capital Max Group LLC—reported as formerly Q7Capital Group LLC—and real-estate professional AnnaMarie DeFrank among the defendants.
The complaint is reported to assert federal claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), along with state-law claims that include fraudulent inducement or misrepresentation, breach of contract, civil theft, and conspiracy. These are claims made by the plaintiffs. Naming a person or business as a defendant does not establish liability, and the reports do not describe a judicial finding that any defendant committed fraud.
What repayment agreement and quotation do the reports describe?
ArtDaily reports that a later repayment agreement promised $445,000, with amendments addressing unpaid salary, and alleges that the defendants did not fulfill the agreement. The article also attributes to Morris Jaime Godur a statement from an alleged July 2024 conversation: “these people have a lot of money, you don’t mess with them.” That wording and its context are reported secondhand; they should not be treated as independently verified quotations from the court filing.
Has the court ruled?
The sources describe the case as being in an early stage and the allegations as unadjudicated as of mid-December 2025. They are secondary news reports, not the complaint or an official court docket. They do not establish whether defendants filed responses, whether the court ruled on any motion, or whether the case later settled or ended in judgment. Accordingly, no current procedural status beyond that dated reporting can be verified here.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rank #3
The case number reported by both outlets is 0:25-cv-62520 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, with a reported filing date of December 5, 2025. For a current status or the exact language of a claim, consult the court record rather than relying on summaries of allegations.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to read the allegations
For a personal-finance reader, the central reported issue is the claimed request for substantial upfront payments in exchange for access to very large credit facilities. The lawsuit’s account remains disputed unless and until supported by evidence and resolved through the legal process. The reports do not provide an official statistical estimate or verified aggregate loss for this case.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
