What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
There is no reliable, current public figure established for Eric Holder’s net worth. The available official records are dated household disclosures: Senate Judiciary Committee materials reported $5,721,946 in 2009, while a 2013 statement reported $2,394,026 after liabilities. Neither figure should be presented as Holder’s current individual net worth.
What do public records say about Eric Holder’s net worth?
The clearest figures come from financial disclosures submitted to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. They describe household finances at particular filing dates, not a current balance sheet for Holder alone.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Nord'', n°58/Décembre 2011: Eric Holder | $21.61 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
L'alphabet des oiseaux | $8.64 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Barack Obama Is Afraid of Sharyl Attkisson: The definitive guide to the shenanigans of America's... | $7.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
La Correspondante | $18.83 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
L'histoire de Chirac | $120.27 | Buy on Amazon |
| Filing | Reported assets | Reported liabilities | Reported net worth | Scope and context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 nomination materials | $5,721,946 | None listed in the extracted statement | $5,721,946 | Household statement covering the nominee, spouse and other immediate household members; included financial accounts, real estate, personal property and retirement plans. Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire |
| 2013 financial statement | $2,804,026 | $410,000 | $2,394,026 | Historical household disclosure; listed a mortgage on a personal residence among liabilities. Senate Judiciary Committee financial statement |
Why the two disclosures do not establish a current figure
Each disclosure is a snapshot prepared for a distinct filing context. The records do not provide a harmonized basis for comparing valuation dates, household scope, asset treatment and liabilities. For that reason, the difference between the 2009 and 2013 totals cannot be treated as a verified loss or change in Holder’s personal wealth.
Nor do these historical statements establish what Holder owns or owes now. Estimating a current figure would require later, reliable information about assets and liabilities; applying assumed investment returns, property appreciation or earnings would be speculation.
#1 Best Overall
Reported law-firm compensation is income, not net worth
The 2009 nomination questionnaire lists Covington & Burling partner compensation of $2,154,364 for 2008 and $2,508,943 for 2009. The filing says the 2009 amount included deferred compensation from the prior fiscal year, pro rata compensation for current-year work, pension contributions and a separation payment. These are compensation figures for specified periods, not calculations of net worth. Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire
What Holder’s later career tells us—and what it does not
The Justice Department’s historical biography says Holder left the Attorney General post in 2015 and returned to private practice as senior counsel at Covington & Burling. That career information does not disclose his later earnings, assets, liabilities or present net worth. U.S. Department of Justice biography
Rank #2
How to read online net-worth estimates
A net-worth estimate is only as useful as its underlying, attributable accounting. The official records above support two dated household figures; they do not support an updated total. Treat a website’s present-tense claim about Holder’s wealth cautiously unless it identifies reliable, current financial records and explains what the figure includes.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
