Elon Musk confirmed discussions between Terafab and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), raising the possibility that Intel may not be the project’s sole or primary chipmaking partner. But discussions are not a signed deal: the available reporting does not establish that TSMC has won Terafab production or that Intel has been removed.
What did Elon Musk say about Intel and TSMC?
The reported development is that Musk confirmed Terafab discussions with TSMC. That is meaningful because Intel had already announced a Terafab partnership involving SpaceX, xAI and Tesla. It does not, by itself, tell investors which company will manufacture Terafab chips, how work might be allocated, or whether either company has received a production award. The Motley Fool’s October 8, 2026 report describes the talks, not a completed agreement.
![[Brandon Turner]-The Book on Rental Property Investing- How to Create Wealth and Passive Income Through Intelligent Buy & Hold Real Estate Investing! (SoftCover)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51mMR6cQZCL._SL160_.jpg)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Intel’s Q1 2026 earnings-call comments said the company had announced its partnership with the three Terafab participants. Intel also said it expected early design commitments for its 14A process to begin in the second half of 2026 and expand into the first half of 2027. Those were forward-looking expectations about prospective customer commitments—not confirmation that Terafab had selected 14A. Intel’s Q1 2026 call therefore supports a partnership announcement and an expected timeline, but not a disclosed Terafab order.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Is TSMC replacing Intel in Terafab?
There is no evidence in the reported development that TSMC is replacing Intel. A conversation can lead to many outcomes: no deal, a limited engagement, or some form of work-sharing. The available information does not specify an agreement, manufacturing assignment, volumes, or timing for either company.
#1 Best Overall
A possible split role is one scenario, not an announced arrangement. For example, companies could have different roles in wafer manufacturing, process expertise, or advanced packaging. Nothing in the cited reporting establishes that Terafab has divided those responsibilities—or that it will do so.
| Question | What is established |
|---|---|
| Has Intel announced a Terafab partnership? | Intel said it announced a partnership with SpaceX, xAI and Tesla to support Terafab. That statement does not disclose a Terafab manufacturing award. |
| Has TSMC signed a Terafab deal? | The report describes discussions; it does not establish a signed agreement. |
| Has Terafab chosen Intel 14A? | No. Intel’s expected 14A design-commitment timeline is not a disclosed Terafab selection. |
| Could the companies have different roles? | It is a possible scenario, but no division of work is established. |
Why could this matter to Intel shareholders?
The concern is about the expectations attached to Intel Foundry: Terafab could become a prominent external customer and help validate Intel’s manufacturing business. If TSMC participates substantially, Intel might receive less of that opportunity than investors hoping for an exclusive or dominant role had anticipated. That is a risk to the bullish case, not proof that Intel has lost business.
The Motley Fool reported Intel Foundry revenue of $5.8 billion for the quarter, up 31% year over year, and said $5.5 billion came from Intel’s own chipmaking business. Those are figures as reported in that article, not independently verified here against Intel’s quarterly filing. The distinction matters: internal chip production is not the same as revenue from external foundry customers, so the headline revenue figure alone does not show how much outside demand Intel has secured.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
The same article reported that Intel shares had risen 163% since the beginning of April and traded at 63 times forward earnings estimates when it was written on October 8, 2026. Those are dated, point-in-time figures—not current market data. They help explain why a possible setback to the foundry growth story could concern shareholders, but they do not establish what the stock is worth today.
Rank #3
What do Intel’s 14A plans and TSMC’s capacity timeline tell investors?
Intel’s process roadmap includes 14A, but the company cautions that its plans, roadmaps and performance estimates may change without notice. The roadmap is evidence of a stated development plan, not proof that a particular customer has committed to use the process. Intel’s Foundry Process Roadmap should be read with that qualification in mind.
TSMC’s chairman and CEO, C.C. Wei, described the long lead time involved in adding and ramping fabrication capacity. On the company’s Q1 2026 earnings call, Wei said building a new fab takes two to three years and ramping it takes another one to two years. The April 16, 2026 transcript puts those timelines in the context of TSMC’s comments about competition and capacity. They underline that foundry capability is built over time; they do not show that TSMC has committed capacity to Terafab.
Wei also called Intel a “formidable competitors” in the transcript’s exact wording. That comment recognizes Intel as a competitor; it is not evidence of a Terafab agreement or an assessment of which company Terafab will choose.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →What should investors watch next?
The useful signals are concrete disclosures rather than the existence of talks alone:
Quick Recap
- A defined customer commitment: Look for an announcement identifying Terafab as an Intel 14A customer or specifying another foundry relationship. Intel’s expected early 14A design commitments are not equivalent to a named order.
- Work allocation: Watch for details separating wafer production, process or design support, and advanced packaging. Without those details, claims that one company is the exclusive or primary supplier remain speculation.
- Capacity and timing: A prospective partnership matters more financially when it translates into production plans, capacity commitments and a ramp schedule.
- External foundry revenue: Distinguish sales to outside customers from Intel’s own chipmaking activity when evaluating whether Intel Foundry is gaining commercial traction.
- Terms and scale: A customer relationship’s investment significance depends on whether it is funded and high-volume, not merely whether discussions or a partnership announcement exist.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
