Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Kim Basinger did not buy Braselton’s town government, and the available reporting does not establish that she personally lost $20 million. In 1989, she joined an investment group that agreed to pay a reported $20 million for extensive private property and businesses in Braselton, Georgia. The venture’s tourism plans did not unfold as proposed, and the holdings were sold in 1993, but the partnership’s sale price is not an accounting of Basinger’s personal loss.
What did Kim Basinger buy in Braselton?
Basinger was part of an investment group that agreed to buy a large collection of privately owned land, businesses and infrastructure in Braselton. Contemporary accounts describe the scope somewhat differently. United Press International reported a supermarket, a bank, stores, a 600-acre industrial park and 1,200 additional acres; the Los Angeles Times described about 1,800 acres, the water and sewer system, businesses, and roughly 50 homes and other buildings. The Washington Post said the contract covered nearly everything in town except public streets, the cemetery, private residences and the Braselton name. These descriptions support “roughly 1,700 to 1,800 acres of property and commercial holdings,” not a claim that she acquired the municipality. UPI’s March 28, 1989 report, the Los Angeles Times account and the Washington Post report document the contemporary descriptions.
The distinction matters: Braselton remained a town with its own public government. The deal concerned private assets, and reporting does not say Basinger bought public streets or took over municipal authority.
Was the $20 million Basinger’s personal investment?
No source cited here establishes that she personally paid the full $20 million. The price was reported as the purchase cost for the investment group. The Los Angeles Times later reported that Basinger partnered with a Chicago company, identified in a 1990 report as Ameritech, and said the company would not disclose the partnership’s details. The available accounts do not provide Basinger’s equity contribution, ownership percentage, financing terms or share of any sale proceeds. The 1990 Los Angeles Times report describes the partnership, but does not supply an individual accounting.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
That means the popular claim that she “lost $20 million” cannot be verified from the reported purchase price alone. A partnership’s gross purchase cost is not the same thing as one investor’s personal cash contribution or ultimate loss.
What was the plan for Braselton?
The investment was promoted as a way to turn Braselton into a tourist destination. Reported ideas included movie and recording studios, boutiques, a film festival, a visitor center and a movie about the town’s history. Basinger also pledged to restore the town and attract visitors. These were proposals in contemporaneous coverage, not proof that the facilities or attractions were built. UPI described the visitor-center and film idea, while the Washington Post reported the restoration and tourism ambitions.
At the time, the proposal drew a positive response from H.B. “Kit” Braselton, a town councilman and family member, who told UPI: “Her proposal sounds beautiful and wonderful for the community and the people living here.” UPI reported the comment on March 28, 1989.
What happened to the investment?
The New Georgia Encyclopedia says financial problems led Basinger to abandon the plans and sell the property in 1993 for $1 million. That figure is the reported sale price for the holdings; it does not establish how much the partnership owed, how the sale proceeds were distributed or what Basinger personally lost. The New Georgia Encyclopedia’s Braselton history provides the retrospective account of the sale.
Rank #3
The 1989 purchase price and 1993 sale figure are often treated as if their difference proves Basinger’s personal loss. It does not. Without the partnership’s complete financial records, the difference between those reported gross transaction figures cannot be converted into her individual loss.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Was the Braselton deal connected to Basinger’s bankruptcy?
It is important to distinguish the investment from the separate Boxing Helena contract dispute. A 1994 Los Angeles Times report said a jury had returned an $8.1 million verdict against Basinger in that dispute and that it contributed to bankruptcy proceedings. The same report said an appeals court overturned the verdict because of ambiguous jury instructions; it described the bankruptcy as unresolved at that time. The initial verdict should therefore not be presented as a final damages obligation, nor as proof of a specific loss on the Braselton property. The 1994 Los Angeles Times account covers the separate litigation and appeal.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
- non-fiction african american book set
- non-fiction black book set
- non-fiction african american children's book set
- non-fiction black children's book set
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
