Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Blur’s website is scheduled to close on November 12, 2026, and its Blend service will stop arranging new NFT-backed loans that day. But reporting says the Ethereum marketplace contracts will remain operational, so this is not the same as erasing Blur’s on-chain system. Nor is there evidence that NFT collectors broadly celebrated the announcement. The positive reaction some people may have is rooted in a long-running dispute over token incentives, speculative trading and creator royalties.
What is actually closing?
CoinDesk reported on October 13, 2026, that Blur plans to close its website on November 12. Blend, the NFT lending service associated with Blur, is also scheduled to stop matching new loans on that date. These are consequential service changes, but they are distinct from shutting down the Ethereum contracts: CoinDesk and other reporting say those contracts will remain operational.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
On NFTs (Varia) | $16.50 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Digital Art (World of Art) | $24.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
How to Collect Art | $23.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Art of Boutis | $21.17 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Beeple: Everydays, the First 5000 Days | $21.35 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That distinction matters to users. A website is a familiar interface for accessing a service; smart contracts are programs on a blockchain. The reported continuation of the contracts does not guarantee that Blur’s website features, support or transaction workflow will remain available. It does mean the announcement should not be described as deleting the marketplace contracts or making every on-chain asset disappear.
- Website: scheduled to close November 12, 2026.
- Blend: scheduled to stop arranging new loans that day.
- Ethereum marketplace contracts: reporting says they will remain operational.
- Marketplace fee switch: BLUR tokenholders are reported to retain control of the mechanism for voting on whether trading fees should be introduced.
What should Blend borrowers do?
CoinDesk says borrowers have until the announced date to repay their loans or allow them to default. It also reports that Blur plans a separate post-shutdown tool for withdrawing Blend assets. The complete withdrawal procedure and its precise availability were not established in the reporting, so borrowers should not assume that the tool is already available or that a particular sequence of steps is safe.
#1 Best Overall
- Check your Blend position. Identify any outstanding loan and its repayment or default status using the service’s current official interface or communications.
- Act before November 12. Repay loans or make an informed decision about default before the announced deadline. A default can have consequences for the collateral and position; do not treat it as a substitute for withdrawal instructions.
- Follow current official guidance. Check Blur’s official channels for the latest instructions on the planned withdrawal tool. Do not rely on an unverified message, link or third-party guide to move assets.
The announcement establishes a deadline and says a withdrawal tool is planned; it does not, by itself, establish the exact steps, costs or recovery options for every borrower. If you have an open position, preserve records of its terms and status and verify any transaction details before signing.
Why might some people welcome Blur’s retreat?
Blur launched in 2022 with tools aimed at professional NFT traders, including faster transactions, low fees and token rewards. Those features helped it attract substantial activity, but they also sharpened disagreements about what that activity represented and who benefited from it.
Rank #2
Rewards and speculative trading
Critics argued that aggressive incentives encouraged speculative trading and airdrop farming: activity motivated partly by the possibility of rewards rather than lasting interest in the NFTs being traded. CoinDesk’s October 13, 2026 report described criticism that Blur’s incentive programs encouraged speculative trading and put pressure on royalties paid to creators. Such criticism is not proof that every Blur trade was speculative. Trading volume alone cannot distinguish a collector buying an NFT for its own sake from activity driven by incentives; allegations of wash trading should likewise be treated as allegations or attributed assessments, not as a proven explanation for all volume.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsCreator royalties and buyer costs
Royalties on secondary NFT sales are intended to direct a share of resale proceeds to creators, though the policies and enforcement mechanisms can vary. Critics of low or optional royalties argued that reducing those payments could deprive artists of support for ongoing work. In a 2023 Forbes article about wash-traded sales detected on Blur, NFT creator and collector Jimmy McNelis (J1mmy.eth) argued that creator royalties help fund a collection’s continued development.
Rank #3
The conflict is not simply artists versus careless buyers. Some collectors have favored marketplaces that forego royalties because lower costs can benefit buyers. In a 2022 Axios article about that broader dispute, NFT artist Hackatao said: “Artist Royalties are as fundamental as rain: They keep the creative cycle alive.” That was a historical comment about royalties, not a reaction to Blur’s 2026 announcement.
In practical terms, traders who valued low transaction costs and token rewards may view the closure as a loss. Creators and royalty advocates may welcome the retreat from a model they regarded as harmful. Those are plausible stakeholder perspectives grounded in the history of the debate, not measured reactions to this particular announcement.
Rank #4
What do Blur’s trading figures show—and what do they not?
CoinDesk’s October 2026 report, citing DefiLlama data, put Blur’s share of Ethereum NFT trading volume above 70% in March 2023. It reported monthly volume of about $1.43 billion at Blur’s March 2023 peak, compared with less than $7 million in March 2026—a decline of more than 99.5% between those reported monthly figures.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
| Measure | Reported figure | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Ethereum NFT trading-volume share | More than 70% in March 2023, according to DefiLlama data cited by CoinDesk in 2026 | Blur had a large reported share of activity at that point; share is not the same as revenue or proof of durable demand. |
| Monthly trading volume | About $1.43 billion in March 2023; less than $7 million in March 2026, as reported by CoinDesk in 2026 | The reported figures show a steep fall in monthly activity. Volume does not establish how much came from genuine buyers versus reward-seeking trading. |
| Marketplace protocol revenue | $0 over the three-year period cited by CoinDesk, based on Token Terminal data | This is a marketplace protocol-revenue measure, not a statement about Blend lending or every source of business revenue. |
| Advertised lifetime trading volume | More than $7.4 billion, cited in CoinDesk’s October 2026 report | This is Blur’s advertised cumulative figure, not a measure of current monthly activity. |
The figures help explain why Blur’s scale in 2023 did not necessarily translate into lasting activity. They do not establish that incentives caused the later decline, or that trading volume was all organic. CoinDesk also reported that BLUR fell more than 20% to about $0.015 after the shutdown news. That is a volatile market snapshot, not a stable valuation or a measure of collector opinion.
Best Value
Has Blur explained why it is closing?
CoinDesk reported that Blur had not publicly attributed the shutdown to operating losses. The $0 marketplace protocol-revenue figure cited above cannot fill that gap: it does not establish whether Blend or other activity generated revenue, and it is not a complete account of Blur’s finances. It is therefore more accurate to describe the reported decline in marketplace volume and the revenue metric as business context, not as Blur’s confirmed reason for closing the website.
Are NFT collectors actually cheering?
The available reporting does not establish that NFT collectors broadly cheered this specific shutdown. The reported fall in BLUR after the announcement points to a negative reaction in the token market, but token prices are not a poll of NFT users. The best-supported conclusion is that reactions depend on what someone valued: inexpensive, reward-driven trading; creator royalties; or a marketplace model that could sustain activity without heavy incentives.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
