DriversRecommendedOutdated drivers can make a good PC feel brokenScan driver issues before chasing fixes manually.Scan NowOctober DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan Now×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

After 29 Years of Service, a Kyoto Bus Driver Lost His ¥12.1 Million Retirement Allowance

A Kyoto bus driver lost a ¥12,114,214 lump-sum retirement allowance after Japan’s Supreme Court upheld full withholding. The case involved a 1,000-yen fare note, five e-cigarette incidents and an initial denial.
From TheFinanceBase Team2 min to read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

A Kyoto municipal bus driver with about 29 years of service lost a one-time retirement allowance of ¥12,114,214 after Japan’s Supreme Court upheld the full withholding on April 17, 2025. It was not a loss of recurring pension payments. The case involved a 1,000-yen fare note that the driver did not record as revenue, along with five on-duty e-cigarette incidents and his initial denial of taking the cash.

What happened to the driver’s retirement money?

The driver worked for Kyoto’s municipal transport authority for about 29 years. Five passengers owed ¥1,150 in total fares. He had them put ¥150 in coins into the fare box, then accepted a ¥1,000 note by hand without processing it as fare revenue. He later repaid the ¥1,000.

A manager discovered the conduct while reviewing bus dash-camera footage. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s case summary says the driver admitted using an e-cigarette in a meeting with a superior, but initially denied taking the fare note before admitting it when challenged. The same case involved five instances of e-cigarette use while he was in the driver’s seat of a stopped bus with no passengers aboard, despite a transport-bureau ban. (Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare case summary)

Was it really €73,000 over a €6 fare?

The official case summary records the withheld retirement allowance as ¥12,114,214 and the fare note as ¥1,000. The €73,000 figure is Le Parisien’s rounded currency conversion, not the denomination of the benefit or a recurring pension payment. The passengers’ combined fare was ¥1,150. These figures describe this individual case, not Japanese pension benefits generally. (Le Parisien, reporting with AFP, April 18, 2025)

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What did Japan’s Supreme Court decide?

On April 17, 2025, the Supreme Court set aside the part of the Osaka High Court judgment that had favored the driver and rejected his appeal. The full withholding therefore remained in place. The dismissal and the decision to withhold the retirement allowance were separate employment decisions: the Osaka High Court had upheld the dismissal while finding full withholding excessive.

The Ministry’s synopsis describes the legal standard as a review of the administrator’s discretion: a decision is unlawful when it is markedly unreasonable in social terms and exceeds the bounds of that discretion or abuses it. The Court treated taking public money during official duties as serious misconduct. Drivers were expected to handle fares properly, and bureau rules prohibited carrying personal money at work; the conduct also damaged trust in bus operations.

The Court considered the other relevant conduct and the driver’s initial denial. It concluded that the small amount, repayment, long service and absence of prior discipline for general service or handling public money did not make full withholding an abuse of discretion in these circumstances. The ruling does not establish that every small fare theft automatically eliminates a worker’s retirement benefits. (Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare case summary)

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

How did the courts differ?

  • Disciplinary dismissal: The dismissal remained upheld.
  • Retirement allowance: The Osaka High Court had found withholding the entire allowance excessive, weighing the ¥1,000 loss, repayment, 29 years of service and lack of other misconduct of this kind.
  • Supreme Court: It overturned that favorable portion of the High Court judgment and left full withholding in place, applying the discretionary standard to the broader circumstances of the case.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.